Skip to content
Procedure

Transfer pricing

2023/0322(CNS)·9th term·ECON·CNS - Consultation procedure·In progressAwaiting final decision
Rapporteur (the Member appointed to lead Parliament's work on this text): PETER-HANSEN Kira Marie (Greens/EFA)
Summary

A proposed directive on transfer pricing. Amendments centre on harmonising the application of the arm's length principle across Member States to reduce double taxation, profit shifting and tax avoidance, reference the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines and the BEPS project, the treatment of associated enterprises and permanent establishments, corresponding adjustments, the interquartile range, documentation requirements, and alternatives such as unitary taxation and the BEFIT framework.

Procedure timeline

  1. Committee amendments tabled
    18 Dec 2023
  2. Plenary vote — Adopted
    10 Apr 2024 · On the Commission proposal (the draft law)
  3. In progress — not yet concluded
164
Amendments
distinct, in window
14
Members
tabled at least one
1
Committee
18 Dec 2023
Dates

Plenary votes

1 roll-call votes

In plenary, Parliament usually votes in steps: first on amendments to the text (sometimes split into parts, so Members can accept one half of a sentence and reject the other), then on the text as a whole. The “main vote” is the one that adopts or rejects the text itself. Each vote below shows exactly which step it was. How voting works →

  1. 10 Apr 2024Main voteAdopted
    On the Commission proposal (the draft law)
    Official label: Proposition de la Commission · what was voted ↗
    438 for99 against63 abstentions105 did not vote
    For
    Against
    Abst.

    Click a group to see each Member’s position.

Vote data: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL, attribution) / European Parliament · roll-call votes only

Statistical baseline — not a forecast

How groups usually vote on similar files

Based on 117 past main roll-call votes on ECON-responsible procedures, Jul 2019 → 2026-07-25.

If every group voted at its historical rate, with today’s seats: 70% of expressed votes in favour.

Seat-weighted baseline over 711 of 711 seats · how often this method is right →

EPPusually FOR95% FOR over 18,571 votes
S&Dusually FOR91% FOR over 14,518 votes
Renewusually FOR94% FOR over 10,224 votes
Greens/EFAusually FOR72% FOR over 7,251 votes
ECRusually FOR50% FOR over 7,189 votes
The Leftusually AGAINST31% FOR over 3,993 votes
Patriotsusually AGAINST24% FOR over 1,875 votes
IDusually AGAINST33% FOR over 5,118 votes
ESNusually AGAINST9% FOR over 579 votes
Non-attachedusually FOR54% FOR over 3,864 votes

Statistical baseline from past roll-call votes; not a forecast. · roll-call votes only

Follow this procedure — subscribe to its votes (RSS)

Official amendment documents

Report a data issue