The future of EU international investment policy
An own-initiative report on the future of EU international investment policy. The amendments criticise the asymmetry of international investment agreements and the investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanism, particularly its costs for developing and African countries, call for ending ISDS in new and existing treaties, balancing investor rights with human-rights, labour and environmental obligations, and aligning EU investment policy with sustainable development, the European Green Deal and the European Climate Law.
Procedure timeline
- Committee amendments tabled15 Feb 2022 – 17 Mar 2022
- Plenary vote — Passed23 Jun 2022 · On the motion for a resolution
- Procedure completed
Plenary votes
1 roll-call votesIn plenary, Parliament usually votes in steps: first on amendments to the text (sometimes split into parts, so Members can accept one half of a sentence and reject the other), then on the text as a whole. The “main vote” is the one that adopts or rejects the text itself. Each vote below shows exactly which step it was. How voting works →
- 23 Jun 2022Main votePassedoutcome from totalsOn the motion for a resolutionOfficial label: Proposition de résolution · what was voted ↗436 for69 against71 abstentions129 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
Vote data: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL, attribution) / European Parliament · roll-call votes only
Official amendment documents
Connections
See these connections as a navigable graph — and walk from there to anything else.
Explore the graphMembers who amended this procedure
41 Members · by amendment countThe amendments, in full text
237 amendmentsEvery amendment as tabled — original text, proposed change and justification, with a link to the official PDF.