Recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy concerning the new EU strategy for enlargement
This dossier is a recommendation on a new EU strategy for enlargement. The amendments cite Western Balkans summits and conclusions, the Copenhagen Criteria, rule-of-law and disinformation findings of the Court of Auditors, and the membership applications of Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia and their candidate status, and offer competing characterisations of enlargement as a foreign-policy instrument and strategic investment in stability and prosperity.
Procedure timeline
- Committee amendments tabled11 Jul 2022
- Plenary vote — Passed23 Nov 2022 · On the draft recommendation
- Procedure completed
Plenary votes
11 roll-call votesIn plenary, Parliament usually votes in steps: first on amendments to the text (sometimes split into parts, so Members can accept one half of a sentence and reject the other), then on the text as a whole. The “main vote” is the one that adopts or rejects the text itself. Each vote below shows exactly which step it was. How voting works →
Show the 8 earlier votes
- 23 Nov 2022Failedoutcome from totalsOn amendment 17 — paragraph 1 — point aOfficial label: § 1, après le point a - Am 17 · what was voted ↗106 for522 against13 abstentions63 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 23 Nov 2022Passedoutcome from totalsOn paragraph 1 — point bOfficial label: § 1, point b · what was voted ↗536 for64 against40 abstentions64 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 23 Nov 2022Failedoutcome from totalsOn amendment 18 — paragraph 1 — point dOfficial label: § 1, point d - Am 18 · what was voted ↗160 for439 against37 abstentions68 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 23 Nov 2022Passedoutcome from totalsOn paragraph 1 — point dOfficial label: § 1, point d · what was voted ↗357 for252 against30 abstentions65 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 23 Nov 2022Passedoutcome from totalsOn paragraph 1 — point j (part 1 of a split vote)Official label: § 1, point j/1 · what was voted ↗550 for56 against28 abstentions70 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 23 Nov 2022Passedoutcome from totalsOn paragraph 1 — point o (part 2 of a split vote)Official label: § 1, point o/2 · what was voted ↗523 for68 against47 abstentions66 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 23 Nov 2022Failedoutcome from totalsOn amendment 19 — paragraph 1 — point yOfficial label: § 1, après le point y - Am 19 · what was voted ↗110 for514 against15 abstentions65 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 23 Nov 2022Passedoutcome from totalsOn recital HOfficial label: Considérant H/2 · what was voted ↗435 for120 against78 abstentions71 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 23 Nov 2022Passedoutcome from totalsOn recital TOfficial label: Considérant T/1 · what was voted ↗550 for80 against9 abstentions65 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 23 Nov 2022Passedoutcome from totalsOn recital TOfficial label: Considérant T/2 · what was voted ↗613 for1 against17 abstentions73 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 23 Nov 2022Main votePassedoutcome from totalsOn the draft recommendationOfficial label: Projet de recommandation · what was voted ↗502 for75 against61 abstentions66 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
Vote data: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL, attribution) / European Parliament · roll-call votes only
Official amendment documents
Connections
See these connections as a navigable graph — and walk from there to anything else.
Explore the graphMembers who amended this procedure
38 Members · by amendment countThe amendments, in full text
445 amendmentsEvery amendment as tabled — original text, proposed change and justification, with a link to the official PDF.