2023 discharge: General budget of the EU - Court of Auditors
This dossier is the 2023 discharge for the EU general budget concerning the Court of Auditors. The amendments address the Court's audited transactions, mission budget and travel allowances, recruitment difficulties and the attractiveness of Luxembourg, EPSO competitions, the Court's access to the FENIX reporting tool on the Recovery and Resilience Facility, audit of European Investment Bank operations, anti-fraud work, gender and geographical balance, teleworking, and staff well-being.
Procedure timeline
- Committee amendments tabled11 Feb 2025
- Plenary vote — Adopted7 May 2025 · On the proposed decision · the text as a whole
- Plenary vote — Adopted7 May 2025 · On the motion for a resolution · the text as a whole
- Procedure completed
Plenary votes
9 roll-call votesIn plenary, Parliament usually votes in steps: first on amendments to the text (sometimes split into parts, so Members can accept one half of a sentence and reject the other), then on the text as a whole. The “main vote” is the one that adopts or rejects the text itself. Each vote below shows exactly which step it was. How voting works →
Where each group stood at the decisive votes
Milestones are the votes that adopt or reject text (not every amendment vote) — the percentage is the share of the group’s Members behind that position. Click a column heading to open the vote below.
Show the 6 earlier votes
- 7 May 2025AdoptedOn paragraph 14 (part 2 of a split vote)Official label: § 14/2 · what was voted ↗385 for249 against31 abstentions54 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 7 May 2025AdoptedOn paragraph 22 (part 2 of a split vote)Official label: § 22/2 · what was voted ↗481 for115 against66 abstentions57 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 7 May 2025AdoptedOn paragraph 23 (part 2 of a split vote)Official label: § 23/2 · what was voted ↗537 for101 against23 abstentions58 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 7 May 2025AdoptedOn paragraph 31 (part 2 of a split vote)Official label: § 31/2 · what was voted ↗488 for109 against68 abstentions54 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 7 May 2025AdoptedOn paragraph 33 (part 2 of a split vote)Official label: § 33/2 · what was voted ↗473 for121 against69 abstentions56 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 7 May 2025RejectedOn amendment 1 · paragraph 45Official label: § 45 - Am 1 · what was voted ↗258 for323 against80 abstentions58 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 7 May 2025RejectedOn amendment 2 · paragraph 47Official label: § 47 - Am 2 · what was voted ↗259 for325 against77 abstentions58 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 7 May 2025Main voteAdoptedOn the motion for a resolution · the text as a wholeOfficial label: Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) · what was voted ↗619 for19 against25 abstentions56 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 7 May 2025Main voteAdoptedOn the proposed decision · the text as a wholeOfficial label: Proposition de décision (ensemble du texte) · what was voted ↗630 for16 against16 abstentions57 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
Vote data: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL, attribution) / European Parliament · roll-call votes only
Plenary amendments4 tabled on this text
Amendments tabled for the plenary sitting on this text, in their own numbering series. This is a different set from the committee amendments tracked elsewhere on AmendEU, and is not counted in any of the site’s amendment totals.
- Amendment 1EPPMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 45Current text
45.
Isconcernedbymedia’sreportthatanEPPOinvestigationonmisuseoffundsbytheformerPresidentof theCourtiscurrentlyblockedbythedecisionof theCourtnottolifthisimmunity;requeststhe CourttofullycooperatewithEPPOonanyinvestigationstheymayactivateandtoreportonthereasonsforthedecisionnottolifttheimmunity;Amendment45. Notes the legal case published on 28 April 2025 in the Official Journal of the European Union concerning a difference of legal understanding between the European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO) and the Court of Auditors; follows with interest the legal procedure and the future decision of the Court of Justice; expects that both the Court of Auditors and the EPPO will fully respect and swiftly implement the content of the ruling of the Court of Justice;
- Amendment 2EPPMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 47Current text
47.
Regretsthat the CourthasfailedtofullycooperatewithEPPObyrefusingtolifttheimmunityofitsformerPresidentandbydenyingEPPO access to conduct a search within its premisesinrelationtoa probe into possible wrongdoing, which could be consideredaninterferencewiththeproper conductofaninvestigation,accordingtotheEPPO;recalls that, as the Union’s external auditor, the Court is bound by the principles of accountability, integrity, and transparency, as well as the principle of mutual sincere cooperation between EU's institutions; calls on the Court to ensure that immunity is not invoked to hinder legitimate judicial proceedings and to take all necessary measurest…Amendment47. Notes that the Court of Auditors submitted all relevant documents to the EPPO about an alleged case concerning a former president of the Court of Auditors but denied the EPPO access to conduct a search within its premises and refused to lift the immunity of the former president because of a different legal opinion; recalls that, as the Union’s external auditor, the Court is bound by the principles of accountability, integrity, and transparency, as well as the principle of mutual sincere cooperation between EU's institutions; calls on the Court to ensure that immunity is not invoked to hinder legitimate judicial proceedings and to take all necessary measures to ensure full compliance with…
Excerpt — full text in the official PDF. - Amendment 3PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 6Current text
6. Notes that the overall budget of the Court for 2023 amounted to EUR 175 059 922, equivalent to an increase of 7,97 % from EUR 162 141 175 in 2022; notes that the increase was primarily due to salary adjustments and nine new temporary posts related to NextGenerationEU; notes that for 2023 88,5 % of appropriations were for its Members and staff, while 11,5 % were for buildings, equipment and miscellaneous expenditure;
Amendment6. Notes that the overall budget of the Court for 2023 amounted to EUR 175 059 922, equivalent to an increase of 7,97 % from EUR 162 141 175 in 2022; notes that the increase was primarily due to salary adjustments and nine new temporary posts related to NextGenerationEU; notes that for 2023 88,5 % of appropriations were for its Members and staff, while 11,5 % were for buildings, equipment and miscellaneous expenditure; welcomes the action of the Court, whose audits and recommendations have made it possible to eliminate inappropriate expenditures through corrective measures, thereby saving significant amounts for European taxpayers, given the poor budget management by the Commission, which un…
Excerpt — full text in the official PDF. - Amendment 4PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 22 a (new)Amendment
22 a. Congratulates the Court for its precise reports, which are much clearer than the Commission's publications; encourages the Court to provide even more concrete examples in the boxes of its reports;
Official amendment documents
Members who amended this procedure
15 Members · by amendment count














The amendments, in full text
75 amendmentsEvery amendment as tabled — original text, proposed change and justification, with a link to the official PDF.