European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025
An own-initiative report on the European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025. The amendments debate fiscal discipline, public debt and excessive deficits, structural reforms, investment gaps and joint borrowing, new own resources and the next MFF, the European Pillar of Social Rights and the social dimension, defence and green and digital transition spending, and Parliament's democratic role, citing the Draghi report and the Recovery and Resilience Facility.
Procedure timeline
- Committee amendments tabled6 Jan 2025 – 14 Jan 2025
- Plenary vote — Adopted12 Mar 2025 · On the motion for a resolution · the text as a whole
Plenary votes
23 roll-call votesIn plenary, Parliament usually votes in steps: first on amendments to the text (sometimes split into parts, so Members can accept one half of a sentence and reject the other), then on the text as a whole. The “main vote” is the one that adopts or rejects the text itself. Each vote below shows exactly which step it was. How voting works →
Show the 20 earlier votes
- 12 Mar 2025RejectedOn amendment 15 (part 2 of a split vote) · paragraph 3Official label: § 3 - Am 15/2 · what was voted ↗188 for460 against19 abstentions52 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Mar 2025AdoptedOn paragraph 3 (part 2 of a split vote)Official label: § 3/2 · what was voted ↗465 for187 against16 abstentions51 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Mar 2025RejectedOn amendment 3 · paragraph 4Official label: § 4 - Am 3 · what was voted ↗115 for508 against46 abstentions50 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Mar 2025RejectedOn amendment 4 · text to be inserted after paragraph 4Official label: Après le § 4 - Am 4 · what was voted ↗139 for392 against139 abstentions49 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Mar 2025RejectedOn amendment 5 · text to be inserted after paragraph 5Official label: Après le § 5 - Am 5 · what was voted ↗112 for531 against29 abstentions47 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Mar 2025RejectedOn amendment 6 · text to be inserted after paragraph 9Official label: Après le § 9 - Am 6 · what was voted ↗122 for506 against51 abstentions40 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Mar 2025AdoptedOn paragraph 10 (part 1 of a split vote)Official label: § 10/1 · what was voted ↗525 for129 against19 abstentions46 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Mar 2025AdoptedOn paragraph 10 (part 2 of a split vote)Official label: § 10/2 · what was voted ↗535 for72 against71 abstentions41 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Mar 2025RejectedOn amendment 7 · text to be inserted after paragraph 21Official label: Après le § 21 - Am 7 · what was voted ↗109 for556 against13 abstentions41 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Mar 2025RejectedOn amendment 8 · text to be inserted after paragraph 21Official label: Après le § 21 - Am 8 · what was voted ↗138 for378 against159 abstentions44 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Mar 2025RejectedOn amendment 9 · text to be inserted after paragraph 23Official label: Après le § 23 - Am 9 · what was voted ↗115 for543 against21 abstentions40 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Mar 2025RejectedOn amendment 10 · text to be inserted after paragraph 23Official label: Après le § 23 - Am 10 · what was voted ↗74 for521 against82 abstentions42 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Mar 2025AdoptedOn paragraph 29 (part 2 of a split vote)Official label: § 29/2 · what was voted ↗487 for137 against49 abstentions46 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Mar 2025RejectedOn amendment 11 · text to be inserted after paragraph 31Official label: Après le § 31 - Am 11 · what was voted ↗103 for531 against44 abstentions41 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Mar 2025AdoptedOn paragraph 32 (part 2 of a split vote)Official label: § 32/2 · what was voted ↗529 for132 against17 abstentions41 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Mar 2025AdoptedOn paragraph 35 (part 2 of a split vote)Official label: § 35/2 · what was voted ↗501 for164 against14 abstentions40 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Mar 2025RejectedOn amendment 12 · text to be inserted after paragraph 35Official label: Après le § 35 - Am 12 · what was voted ↗122 for504 against50 abstentions43 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Mar 2025RejectedOn amendment 14 · text to be inserted after paragraph 35Official label: Après le § 35 - Am 14 · what was voted ↗172 for473 against37 abstentions37 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Mar 2025RejectedOn amendment 20 · text to be inserted after paragraph 41Official label: Après le § 41 - Am 20 · what was voted ↗175 for463 against42 abstentions39 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Mar 2025RejectedOn amendment 1 · text to be inserted after recital FOfficial label: Après le considérant F - Am 1 · what was voted ↗175 for484 against22 abstentions38 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Mar 2025RejectedOn amendment 13 · text to be inserted after recital KOfficial label: Après le considérant K - Am 13 · what was voted ↗139 for471 against53 abstentions56 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Mar 2025RejectedOn amendment 2 · text to be inserted after recital POfficial label: Après le considérant P - Am 2 · what was voted ↗129 for499 against55 abstentions36 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Mar 2025Main voteAdoptedOn the motion for a resolution · the text as a wholeOfficial label: Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) · what was voted ↗469 for162 against54 abstentions34 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
Vote data: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL, attribution) / European Parliament · roll-call votes only
Plenary amendments20 tabled on this text
Amendments tabled for the plenary sitting on this text, in their own numbering series. This is a different set from the committee amendments tracked elsewhere on AmendEU, and is not counted in any of the site’s amendment totals.
- Amendment 1The LeftMotion for a resolution · Recital F a (new)Amendment
Fa. whereas the 3 % deficit-to-GDP and 60 % debt-to-GDP reference values are arbitrary numbers invented in the early 1980s without a sound economic rationale; whereas the prevailing economic conditions at that time were significantly different from those prevailing today;
- Amendment 2The LeftMotion for a resolution · Recital P a (new)Amendment
Pa. whereas country-specific recommendations in the framework of the European Semester tend to incentivise cuts in social services and social protection instead of promoting an increase in public revenue; whereas from the introduction of the European Semester in 2011 to the year 2018, the Commission recommended 63 times that governments cut spending on healthcare or privatise healthcare services;
- Amendment 3The LeftMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 4Current text
4. Highlights the fact that an
integrated,coordinated,targeted and horizontalindustrialpolicyisvitaltoincreaseinvestments in the EU’s innovation capacity, while bolstering competitiveness and theintegrityofthesinglemarket;Amendment4. Highlights the fact that an integrated and coordinated industrial policy encompasses both targeted and horizontal measures; stresses its relevance for strategically boosting investments in the EU’s innovation capacity, while bolstering competitiveness and the EU’s strategic autonomy; welcomes the European Investment Bank to play a crucial role in guiding the investments;
- Amendment 4The LeftMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 4 a (new)Amendment
4a. Welcomes SURE-like funds that are subject to social and environmental conditionalities as an effective tool to mitigate job losses in crisis-hit industries, particularly the automotive sector; recalls that saving manufacturing jobs also means preventing the dispersion of competencies and capabilities needed to build a competitive and dynamic industrial system; recalls that public funds should serve as a driver for improving working conditions;
- Amendment 5The LeftMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 5 a (new)Amendment
5a. Recalls that failure to mitigate and adapt to climate change fast enough as a result of underinvestment or delayed investments will not only have catastrophic human consequences, but will also be much more costly in sheer economic terms, hence contradicting the very purpose of the fiscal rules, which is to support sound public finances;
- Amendment 6The LeftMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 9 a (new)Amendment
9a. Recalls that the International Monetary Fund, a long-time supporter of austerity and structural adjustments, acknowledges that fiscal consolidation is not effective, on average, at lowering debt-to-GDP ratios;
- Amendment 7The LeftMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 21 a (new)Amendment
21a. Regrets that the revised economic governance framework fails to enhance social progress and convergence and to foster the ecological transition; reiterates that instead of focusing on irrelevant economic indicators and pursuing endless debt and deficit reduction, EU economic governance should aim to eradicate poverty and inequalities, and provide a high level of social protection, qualitative public services and individual and collective well-being through fulfilling the essential needs of all citizens and ecological planification;
- Amendment 8The LeftMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 21 b (new)Amendment
21b. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to exclude future-oriented public investment, and in particular investment in social infrastructure such as non-profit housing, from the fiscal rules of the Stability and Growth Pact;
- Amendment 9The LeftMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 23 a (new)Amendment
23a. Believes that instead of promoting harmful budgetary cuts and structural reforms in order to reach the debt and deficit targets prescribed by the Stability and Growth Pact, EU economic governance should favour and facilitate the collection, by Member States and at EU level, of additional resources through fair taxation, in particular taxes on the wealthiest and multinational companies, taxes on ecologically harmful products and services, the cancellation of ineffective and unfair tax and social contribution exemptions, and the fight against tax dodging and tax evasion by wealthy individuals and multinational companies;
- Amendment 10The LeftMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 23 b (new)Amendment
23b. Highlights that, in general, budgetary cuts justified to comply with the economic governance rules correspond to the cost of tax breaks and tax allowances granted to wealthy individuals and multinational corporations; notes that, for instance, in the specific case of France, the EUR 60 billion in budgetary cuts proposed by the French Government for the 2025 budget equate exactly to the annual cost of tax breaks and tax allowances granted to wealthy individuals and multinational corporations by the French Government since 2017;
- Amendment 11The LeftMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 31 a (new)Amendment
31a. Regrets that in order to comply with the revised economic governance rules, Member State governments, with France at the forefront, have committed in their national fiscal and budgetary plans to reducing public expenditure and to implementing structural reforms; deplores that these commitments have already, or will in the near future, translate into concrete measures deeply affecting the population, such as a reform of the pension system, a reform of the unemployment scheme, a decrease in healthcare reimbursements and job cuts in public administrations such as public education, leading to a general degradation of public services; warns that these economic policies aimed at complying wit…
Excerpt — full text in the official PDF. - Amendment 12The LeftMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 35 a (new)Amendment
35a. Notes that the President of the Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, proposed a suspension of fiscal rules for defence investments; condemns the double standards that allow military spending to rise indefinitely while social and environmental expenditure continues to face budget cuts; calls for any modification of the fiscal framework to be democratically approved by Parliament; highlights the fact that fiscal rules were already suspended during the COVID-19 crisis and stresses that the need to amend this framework in every crisis demonstrates its long-term inadequacy;
- Amendment 13ECRMotion for a resolution · Recital K a (new)Amendment
Ka. whereas, in the context of the anticipated ReArm Europe plan, the President of the Commission indicated the intention to activate the national escape clause of the Stability and Growth Pact to allow Member States to increase defence-related investments; whereas this announcement was made in response to escalating geopolitical tensions, in particular the ongoing Russian aggression against Ukraine and the need to enhance Member States’ defence capabilities; whereas fiscal flexibility is essential to enable all Member States to contribute effectively to European security while safeguarding economic stability and competitiveness;
- Amendment 14ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 35 a (new)Amendment
35a. Encourages the swift activation of the national escape clause of the Stability and Growth Pact in order to provide Member States with the necessary fiscal flexibility to scale up defence investments without triggering excessive deficit procedures; underlines that reinforcing the Union’s security requires a structured approach to defence expenditure, ensuring targeted investments that strengthen industrial capacity and strategic autonomy;
- Amendment 15PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 3Current text
3.
Notesthe Commission’s commitment toensurethatthe European Semesterdrivespolicy coordination forcompetitiveness,sustainability and socialfairness,as well as the integration of theUNSustainable Development Goals and the Europeanpillarofsocialrights;notesthatthe European Green Deal remains a core deliverable for the Commission;Amendment3. Recalls the original objective of the European Semester, which was the coordination of budgetary and economic policies across the Union; regrets, in this regard, the Commission’s commitment over the years to continuously expand the original scope of the European Semester in order to drive policy coordination for sustainability and social fairness as well as the integration of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and the European Pillar of Social Rights; regrets that, despite its negative impact on the European economy, industry and competitiveness, the European Green Deal remains a core deliverable for the Commission;
- Amendment 16PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 5Current text
5. Highlights that public and private investments are crucial for the EU’s ability to cope with existing challenges, including developing the EU’s innovation capacity and implementing the just green and digital transitions, and that they will increase the EU’s resilience, long-term competitiveness and open strategic autonomy; calls attention to the need for strategic investments in energy interconnections, low-carbon energies (such as renewables) and energy efficiency to, among other things, (i) make the EU independent from imported fossil fuels and prevent the possible inflationary effects of dependence on these, (ii) modernise production systems and (iii) promote social cohesion; recalls t…
Amendment5. Highlights that public and private investments are crucial for the EU’s ability to cope with existing challenges, including developing the EU’s innovation capacity and implementing the just green and digital transitions, and that they will increase the EU’s resilience, long-term competitiveness and open strategic autonomy; calls attention to the need for strategic investments in energy interconnections, low-carbon energies (such as renewables) and energy efficiency to, among other things, (i) make the EU independent from imported fossil fuels and prevent the possible inflationary effects of dependence on these, (ii) modernise production systems and (iii) promote social cohesion; recalls t…
Excerpt — full text in the official PDF. - Amendment 17PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 15Current text
15. Notes that eight Member States have excessive deficits; recalls that the Council has taken remedial action and calls on the Member States concerned to take steps to reduce excessive deficits while minimising the socio-economic impact; recalls the importance of
consistency inapplyingtheexcessivedeficitproceduretotheMemberStates;Amendment15. Notes that eight Member States have excessive deficits; recalls that the Council has taken remedial action and calls on the Member States concerned to take steps to reduce excessive deficits while minimising the socio-economic impact; recalls the importance of the equal treatment of Member States regarding the excessive deficit procedure;
- Amendment 18PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 22Current text
22. Highlights that the debt sustainability analysis (DSA) plays a key role in the reformed EU fiscal rules; is of the opinion that the discretionary role of the Commission in the DSA requires the relevant assessments to be fully transparent, predictable, replicable and stable; calls on the Commission to
addresspossible methodological improvements, such as assessing spillover effects between Member States, and to duly inform Parliament in this regard;Amendment22. Highlights that the debt sustainability analysis (DSA) plays a key role in the reformed EU fiscal rules; is of the opinion that the discretionary role of the Commission in the DSA requires the relevant assessments to be fully transparent, predictable, replicable and stable; calls on the Commission to address, together with the Member States’ representatives, possible methodological improvements, such as assessing spillover effects between Member States, and to duly inform Parliament in this regard;
- Amendment 19PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 38Current text
38. Notes that the share of ‘fully implemented’ CSRs has dropped from 18.1 % (in the period 2011-2018) to 13.9 % (in the period 2019-2023); recalls that implementing CSRs, including with regard to the efficiency of public spending, is a key part of ensuring fiscal sustainability and addressing macroeconomic imbalances; advocates a more efficient implementation of the CSRs and the relevant reforms; calls for ways of increasing the share of ‘fully implemented’ CSRs to be explored; calls on the Commission to
link the CSRs more closely to the respective countryreports;callsfortheimpactofreformsandtheprogress towards reducing identified investment gaps to beevaluated;callsforgreater…Amendment38. Notes that the share of ‘fully implemented’ CSRs has dropped from 18.1 % (in the period 2011-2018) to 13.9 % (in the period 2019-2023); recalls that implementing CSRs, including with regard to the efficiency of public spending, is a key part of ensuring fiscal sustainability and addressing macroeconomic imbalances; notes that the RRF has not led to substantially higher CSR implementation rates so far; advocates a more efficient implementation of the CSRs and the relevant reforms; calls for ways of increasing the share of ‘fully implemented’ CSRs to be explored; calls on the Commission to increase Member States’ national ownership in order to ensure the full implementation of CSRs; calls…
Excerpt — full text in the official PDF. - Amendment 20PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 41 a (new)Amendment
41a. Reiterates, in this regard, that CSRs must always remain within the remit of EU competences and should never use double standards;
Official amendment documents
Members who amended this procedure
31 Members · by amendment count
























The amendments, in full text
404 amendmentsEvery amendment as tabled — original text, proposed change and justification, with a link to the official PDF.