Skip to content
Procedure

European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025

2024/2112(INI)·10th term·BUDG / ECON·INI
Summary

An own-initiative report on the European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025. The amendments debate fiscal discipline, public debt and excessive deficits, structural reforms, investment gaps and joint borrowing, new own resources and the next MFF, the European Pillar of Social Rights and the social dimension, defence and green and digital transition spending, and Parliament's democratic role, citing the Draghi report and the Recovery and Resilience Facility.

Procedure timeline

  1. Committee amendments tabled
    6 Jan 2025 – 14 Jan 2025
  2. Plenary vote — Adopted
    12 Mar 2025 · On the motion for a resolution · the text as a whole
404
Amendments
distinct, in window
31
Members
tabled at least one
2
Committees
6 Jan 2025 – 14 Jan 2025
Dates

Plenary votes

23 roll-call votes

In plenary, Parliament usually votes in steps: first on amendments to the text (sometimes split into parts, so Members can accept one half of a sentence and reject the other), then on the text as a whole. The “main vote” is the one that adopts or rejects the text itself. Each vote below shows exactly which step it was. How voting works →

  1. Show the 20 earlier votes
    1. 12 Mar 2025Rejected
      On amendment 15 (part 2 of a split vote) · paragraph 3
      Official label: § 3 - Am 15/2 · what was voted ↗
      188 for460 against19 abstentions52 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    2. 12 Mar 2025Adopted
      On paragraph 3 (part 2 of a split vote)
      Official label: § 3/2 · what was voted ↗
      465 for187 against16 abstentions51 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    3. 12 Mar 2025Rejected
      On amendment 3 · paragraph 4
      Official label: § 4 - Am 3 · what was voted ↗
      115 for508 against46 abstentions50 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    4. 12 Mar 2025Rejected
      On amendment 4 · text to be inserted after paragraph 4
      Official label: Après le § 4 - Am 4 · what was voted ↗
      139 for392 against139 abstentions49 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    5. 12 Mar 2025Rejected
      On amendment 5 · text to be inserted after paragraph 5
      Official label: Après le § 5 - Am 5 · what was voted ↗
      112 for531 against29 abstentions47 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    6. 12 Mar 2025Rejected
      On amendment 6 · text to be inserted after paragraph 9
      Official label: Après le § 9 - Am 6 · what was voted ↗
      122 for506 against51 abstentions40 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    7. 12 Mar 2025Adopted
      On paragraph 10 (part 1 of a split vote)
      Official label: § 10/1 · what was voted ↗
      525 for129 against19 abstentions46 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    8. 12 Mar 2025Adopted
      On paragraph 10 (part 2 of a split vote)
      Official label: § 10/2 · what was voted ↗
      535 for72 against71 abstentions41 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    9. 12 Mar 2025Rejected
      On amendment 7 · text to be inserted after paragraph 21
      Official label: Après le § 21 - Am 7 · what was voted ↗
      109 for556 against13 abstentions41 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    10. 12 Mar 2025Rejected
      On amendment 8 · text to be inserted after paragraph 21
      Official label: Après le § 21 - Am 8 · what was voted ↗
      138 for378 against159 abstentions44 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    11. 12 Mar 2025Rejected
      On amendment 9 · text to be inserted after paragraph 23
      Official label: Après le § 23 - Am 9 · what was voted ↗
      115 for543 against21 abstentions40 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    12. 12 Mar 2025Rejected
      On amendment 10 · text to be inserted after paragraph 23
      Official label: Après le § 23 - Am 10 · what was voted ↗
      74 for521 against82 abstentions42 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    13. 12 Mar 2025Adopted
      On paragraph 29 (part 2 of a split vote)
      Official label: § 29/2 · what was voted ↗
      487 for137 against49 abstentions46 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    14. 12 Mar 2025Rejected
      On amendment 11 · text to be inserted after paragraph 31
      Official label: Après le § 31 - Am 11 · what was voted ↗
      103 for531 against44 abstentions41 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    15. 12 Mar 2025Adopted
      On paragraph 32 (part 2 of a split vote)
      Official label: § 32/2 · what was voted ↗
      529 for132 against17 abstentions41 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    16. 12 Mar 2025Adopted
      On paragraph 35 (part 2 of a split vote)
      Official label: § 35/2 · what was voted ↗
      501 for164 against14 abstentions40 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    17. 12 Mar 2025Rejected
      On amendment 12 · text to be inserted after paragraph 35
      Official label: Après le § 35 - Am 12 · what was voted ↗
      122 for504 against50 abstentions43 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    18. 12 Mar 2025Rejected
      On amendment 14 · text to be inserted after paragraph 35
      Official label: Après le § 35 - Am 14 · what was voted ↗
      172 for473 against37 abstentions37 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    19. 12 Mar 2025Rejected
      On amendment 20 · text to be inserted after paragraph 41
      Official label: Après le § 41 - Am 20 · what was voted ↗
      175 for463 against42 abstentions39 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    20. 12 Mar 2025Rejected
      On amendment 1 · text to be inserted after recital F
      Official label: Après le considérant F - Am 1 · what was voted ↗
      175 for484 against22 abstentions38 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

  2. 12 Mar 2025Rejected
    On amendment 13 · text to be inserted after recital K
    Official label: Après le considérant K - Am 13 · what was voted ↗
    139 for471 against53 abstentions56 did not vote
    For
    Against
    Abst.

    Click a group to see each Member’s position.

  3. 12 Mar 2025Rejected
    On amendment 2 · text to be inserted after recital P
    Official label: Après le considérant P - Am 2 · what was voted ↗
    129 for499 against55 abstentions36 did not vote
    For
    Against
    Abst.

    Click a group to see each Member’s position.

  4. 12 Mar 2025Main voteAdopted
    On the motion for a resolution · the text as a whole
    Official label: Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) · what was voted ↗
    469 for162 against54 abstentions34 did not vote
    For
    Against
    Abst.

    Click a group to see each Member’s position.

Vote data: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL, attribution) / European Parliament · roll-call votes only

Plenary amendments20 tabled on this text

Amendments tabled for the plenary sitting on this text, in their own numbering series. This is a different set from the committee amendments tracked elsewhere on AmendEU, and is not counted in any of the site’s amendment totals.

  1. Amendment 1The LeftMotion for a resolution · Recital F a (new)
    Amendment

    Fa. whereas the 3 % deficit-to-GDP and 60 % debt-to-GDP reference values are arbitrary numbers invented in the early 1980s without a sound economic rationale; whereas the prevailing economic conditions at that time were significantly different from those prevailing today;

  2. Amendment 2The LeftMotion for a resolution · Recital P a (new)
    Amendment

    Pa. whereas country-specific recommendations in the framework of the European Semester tend to incentivise cuts in social services and social protection instead of promoting an increase in public revenue; whereas from the introduction of the European Semester in 2011 to the year 2018, the Commission recommended 63 times that governments cut spending on healthcare or privatise healthcare services;

  3. Amendment 3The LeftMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 4
    Current text

    4. Highlights the fact that an integrated, coordinated, targeted and horizontal industrial policy is vital to increase investments in the EU’s innovation capacity, while bolstering competitiveness and the integrity of the single market;

    Amendment

    4. Highlights the fact that an integrated and coordinated industrial policy encompasses both targeted and horizontal measures; stresses its relevance for strategically boosting investments in the EU’s innovation capacity, while bolstering competitiveness and the EU’s strategic autonomy; welcomes the European Investment Bank to play a crucial role in guiding the investments;

  4. Amendment 4The LeftMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 4 a (new)
    Amendment

    4a. Welcomes SURE-like funds that are subject to social and environmental conditionalities as an effective tool to mitigate job losses in crisis-hit industries, particularly the automotive sector; recalls that saving manufacturing jobs also means preventing the dispersion of competencies and capabilities needed to build a competitive and dynamic industrial system; recalls that public funds should serve as a driver for improving working conditions;

  5. Amendment 5The LeftMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 5 a (new)
    Amendment

    5a. Recalls that failure to mitigate and adapt to climate change fast enough as a result of underinvestment or delayed investments will not only have catastrophic human consequences, but will also be much more costly in sheer economic terms, hence contradicting the very purpose of the fiscal rules, which is to support sound public finances;

  6. Amendment 6The LeftMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 9 a (new)
    Amendment

    9a. Recalls that the International Monetary Fund, a long-time supporter of austerity and structural adjustments, acknowledges that fiscal consolidation is not effective, on average, at lowering debt-to-GDP ratios;

  7. Amendment 7The LeftMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 21 a (new)
    Amendment

    21a. Regrets that the revised economic governance framework fails to enhance social progress and convergence and to foster the ecological transition; reiterates that instead of focusing on irrelevant economic indicators and pursuing endless debt and deficit reduction, EU economic governance should aim to eradicate poverty and inequalities, and provide a high level of social protection, qualitative public services and individual and collective well-being through fulfilling the essential needs of all citizens and ecological planification;

  8. Amendment 8The LeftMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 21 b (new)
    Amendment

    21b. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to exclude future-oriented public investment, and in particular investment in social infrastructure such as non-profit housing, from the fiscal rules of the Stability and Growth Pact;

  9. Amendment 9The LeftMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 23 a (new)
    Amendment

    23a. Believes that instead of promoting harmful budgetary cuts and structural reforms in order to reach the debt and deficit targets prescribed by the Stability and Growth Pact, EU economic governance should favour and facilitate the collection, by Member States and at EU level, of additional resources through fair taxation, in particular taxes on the wealthiest and multinational companies, taxes on ecologically harmful products and services, the cancellation of ineffective and unfair tax and social contribution exemptions, and the fight against tax dodging and tax evasion by wealthy individuals and multinational companies;

  10. Amendment 10The LeftMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 23 b (new)
    Amendment

    23b. Highlights that, in general, budgetary cuts justified to comply with the economic governance rules correspond to the cost of tax breaks and tax allowances granted to wealthy individuals and multinational corporations; notes that, for instance, in the specific case of France, the EUR 60 billion in budgetary cuts proposed by the French Government for the 2025 budget equate exactly to the annual cost of tax breaks and tax allowances granted to wealthy individuals and multinational corporations by the French Government since 2017;

  11. Amendment 11The LeftMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 31 a (new)
    Amendment

    31a. Regrets that in order to comply with the revised economic governance rules, Member State governments, with France at the forefront, have committed in their national fiscal and budgetary plans to reducing public expenditure and to implementing structural reforms; deplores that these commitments have already, or will in the near future, translate into concrete measures deeply affecting the population, such as a reform of the pension system, a reform of the unemployment scheme, a decrease in healthcare reimbursements and job cuts in public administrations such as public education, leading to a general degradation of public services; warns that these economic policies aimed at complying wit…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  12. Amendment 12The LeftMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 35 a (new)
    Amendment

    35a. Notes that the President of the Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, proposed a suspension of fiscal rules for defence investments; condemns the double standards that allow military spending to rise indefinitely while social and environmental expenditure continues to face budget cuts; calls for any modification of the fiscal framework to be democratically approved by Parliament; highlights the fact that fiscal rules were already suspended during the COVID-19 crisis and stresses that the need to amend this framework in every crisis demonstrates its long-term inadequacy;

  13. Amendment 13ECRMotion for a resolution · Recital K a (new)
    Amendment

    Ka. whereas, in the context of the anticipated ReArm Europe plan, the President of the Commission indicated the intention to activate the national escape clause of the Stability and Growth Pact to allow Member States to increase defence-related investments; whereas this announcement was made in response to escalating geopolitical tensions, in particular the ongoing Russian aggression against Ukraine and the need to enhance Member States’ defence capabilities; whereas fiscal flexibility is essential to enable all Member States to contribute effectively to European security while safeguarding economic stability and competitiveness;

  14. Amendment 14ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 35 a (new)
    Amendment

    35a. Encourages the swift activation of the national escape clause of the Stability and Growth Pact in order to provide Member States with the necessary fiscal flexibility to scale up defence investments without triggering excessive deficit procedures; underlines that reinforcing the Union’s security requires a structured approach to defence expenditure, ensuring targeted investments that strengthen industrial capacity and strategic autonomy;

  15. Amendment 15PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 3
    Current text

    3. Notes the Commission’s commitment to ensure that the European Semester drives policy coordination for competitiveness, sustainability and social fairness, as well as the integration of the UN Sustainable Development Goals and the European pillar of social rights; notes that the European Green Deal remains a core deliverable for the Commission;

    Amendment

    3. Recalls the original objective of the European Semester, which was the coordination of budgetary and economic policies across the Union; regrets, in this regard, the Commission’s commitment over the years to continuously expand the original scope of the European Semester in order to drive policy coordination for sustainability and social fairness as well as the integration of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and the European Pillar of Social Rights; regrets that, despite its negative impact on the European economy, industry and competitiveness, the European Green Deal remains a core deliverable for the Commission;

  16. Amendment 16PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 5
    Current text

    5. Highlights that public and private investments are crucial for the EU’s ability to cope with existing challenges, including developing the EU’s innovation capacity and implementing the just green and digital transitions, and that they will increase the EU’s resilience, long-term competitiveness and open strategic autonomy; calls attention to the need for strategic investments in energy interconnections, low-carbon energies (such as renewables) and energy efficiency to, among other things, (i) make the EU independent from imported fossil fuels and prevent the possible inflationary effects of dependence on these, (ii) modernise production systems and (iii) promote social cohesion; recalls t…

    Amendment

    5. Highlights that public and private investments are crucial for the EU’s ability to cope with existing challenges, including developing the EU’s innovation capacity and implementing the just green and digital transitions, and that they will increase the EU’s resilience, long-term competitiveness and open strategic autonomy; calls attention to the need for strategic investments in energy interconnections, low-carbon energies (such as renewables) and energy efficiency to, among other things, (i) make the EU independent from imported fossil fuels and prevent the possible inflationary effects of dependence on these, (ii) modernise production systems and (iii) promote social cohesion; recalls t…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  17. Amendment 17PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 15
    Current text

    15. Notes that eight Member States have excessive deficits; recalls that the Council has taken remedial action and calls on the Member States concerned to take steps to reduce excessive deficits while minimising the socio-economic impact; recalls the importance of consistency in applying the excessive deficit procedure to the Member States;

    Amendment

    15. Notes that eight Member States have excessive deficits; recalls that the Council has taken remedial action and calls on the Member States concerned to take steps to reduce excessive deficits while minimising the socio-economic impact; recalls the importance of the equal treatment of Member States regarding the excessive deficit procedure;

  18. Amendment 18PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 22
    Current text

    22. Highlights that the debt sustainability analysis (DSA) plays a key role in the reformed EU fiscal rules; is of the opinion that the discretionary role of the Commission in the DSA requires the relevant assessments to be fully transparent, predictable, replicable and stable; calls on the Commission to address possible methodological improvements, such as assessing spillover effects between Member States, and to duly inform Parliament in this regard;

    Amendment

    22. Highlights that the debt sustainability analysis (DSA) plays a key role in the reformed EU fiscal rules; is of the opinion that the discretionary role of the Commission in the DSA requires the relevant assessments to be fully transparent, predictable, replicable and stable; calls on the Commission to address, together with the Member States’ representatives, possible methodological improvements, such as assessing spillover effects between Member States, and to duly inform Parliament in this regard;

  19. Amendment 19PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 38
    Current text

    38. Notes that the share of ‘fully implemented’ CSRs has dropped from 18.1 % (in the period 2011-2018) to 13.9 % (in the period 2019-2023); recalls that implementing CSRs, including with regard to the efficiency of public spending, is a key part of ensuring fiscal sustainability and addressing macroeconomic imbalances; advocates a more efficient implementation of the CSRs and the relevant reforms; calls for ways of increasing the share of ‘fully implemented’ CSRs to be explored; calls on the Commission to link the CSRs more closely to the respective country reports; calls for the impact of reforms and the progress towards reducing identified investment gaps to be evaluated; calls for greater…

    Amendment

    38. Notes that the share of ‘fully implemented’ CSRs has dropped from 18.1 % (in the period 2011-2018) to 13.9 % (in the period 2019-2023); recalls that implementing CSRs, including with regard to the efficiency of public spending, is a key part of ensuring fiscal sustainability and addressing macroeconomic imbalances; notes that the RRF has not led to substantially higher CSR implementation rates so far; advocates a more efficient implementation of the CSRs and the relevant reforms; calls for ways of increasing the share of ‘fully implemented’ CSRs to be explored; calls on the Commission to increase Member States’ national ownership in order to ensure the full implementation of CSRs; calls…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  20. Amendment 20PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 41 a (new)
    Amendment

    41a. Reiterates, in this regard, that CSRs must always remain within the remit of EU competences and should never use double standards;

Official amendment documents

Full record

Members who amended this procedure

31 Members · by amendment count
1
Carla TAVARES
Carla TAVARES
Socialists & Democrats · 🇵🇹 Portugal
113(17 solo)
2
Thomas BAJADA
Thomas BAJADA
Socialists & Democrats · 🇲🇹 Malta
92(15 solo)
3
Claire FITA
Claire FITA
Socialists & Democrats · 🇫🇷 France
78
4
Lara WOLTERS
Lara WOLTERS
Socialists & Democrats · 🇳🇱 Netherlands
78
5
Matthias ECKE
Matthias ECKE
Socialists & Democrats · 🇩🇪 Germany
76
6
Evelyn REGNER
Evelyn REGNER
Socialists & Democrats · 🇦🇹 Austria
69
7
Jonás FERNÁNDEZ
Jonás FERNÁNDEZ
Socialists & Democrats · 🇪🇸 Spain
67(7 solo)
8
Isabel BENJUMEA BENJUMEA
Isabel BENJUMEA BENJUMEA
European People's Party (EPP) · 🇪🇸 Spain
53(33 solo)
9
Fernando NAVARRETE ROJAS
Fernando NAVARRETE ROJAS
European People's Party (EPP) · 🇪🇸 Spain
52(32 solo)
10
Marie TOUSSAINT
Marie TOUSSAINT
Greens / EFA · 🇫🇷 France
35(35 solo)
11
Damian BOESELAGER
Damian BOESELAGER
Greens / EFA · 🇩🇪 Germany
24(24 solo)
12
Markus FERBER
Markus FERBER
European People's Party (EPP) · 🇩🇪 Germany
21(21 solo)
13
Jens GEIER
Jens GEIER
Socialists & Democrats · 🇩🇪 Germany
20
14
Jean-Marc GERMAIN
Jean-Marc GERMAIN
Socialists & Democrats · 🇫🇷 France
20
15
Manon AUBRY
Manon AUBRY
The Left (GUE/NGL) · 🇫🇷 France
20(20 solo)
16
Auke ZIJLSTRA
Auke ZIJLSTRA
Patriots for Europe · 🇳🇱 Netherlands
17(9 solo)
17
Pierre PIMPIE
Pierre PIMPIE
Patriots for Europe · 🇫🇷 France
17(6 solo)
18
Irene TINAGLI
Irene TINAGLI
Socialists & Democrats · 🇮🇹 Italy
13(13 solo)
19
Giovanni CROSETTO
Giovanni CROSETTO
European Conservatives & Reformists · 🇮🇹 Italy
12
20
Denis NESCI
Denis NESCI
European Conservatives & Reformists · 🇮🇹 Italy
12
21
Francesco VENTOLA
Francesco VENTOLA
European Conservatives & Reformists · 🇮🇹 Italy
12
22
Enikő GYŐRI
Enikő GYŐRI
Patriots for Europe · 🇭🇺 Hungary
12
23
Dirk GOTINK
Dirk GOTINK
European People's Party (EPP) · 🇳🇱 Netherlands
9(9 solo)
24
Victor NEGRESCU
Victor NEGRESCU
Socialists & Democrats · 🇷🇴 Romania
7(7 solo)
25
Lídia PEREIRA
Lídia PEREIRA
European People's Party (EPP) · 🇵🇹 Portugal
7(7 solo)

The amendments, in full text

404 amendments

Every amendment as tabled — original text, proposed change and justification, with a link to the official PDF.

The full amendment texts load as you scroll here.
Report a data issue