Skip to content
Procedure

Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: simplification and strengthening

2025/0039(COD)·10th term·BUDG / ENVI / INTA / ITRE·COD - Ordinary legislative procedure (ex-codecision procedure)·Completed
Rapporteur (the Member appointed to lead Parliament's work on this text): DECARO Antonio (S&D)
Summary

This dossier simplifies and strengthens the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). Amendments introduce a cumulative mass-based threshold per importer per year (debated around 97% of embedded emissions and thresholds such as 100 or 250 tonnes of net mass) for goods in sectors including iron and steel, aluminium and fertilisers, and discuss CBAM revenue as an own resource, the EU Emissions Trading System and free allowances, and a possible scope extension.

Procedure timeline

  1. Committee amendments tabled
    3 Apr 2025 – 8 Apr 2025
  2. Plenary vote — Adopted
    22 May 2025 · On the Commission proposal (the draft law)
  3. Plenary vote — Adopted
    10 Sep 2025 · On the provisional agreement negotiated with the Council (the trilogue deal) · amendment 32
  4. Procedure completed
73
Amendments
distinct, in window
38
Members
tabled at least one
4
Committees
3 Apr 2025 – 8 Apr 2025
Dates

Plenary votes

19 roll-call votes

In plenary, Parliament usually votes in steps: first on amendments to the text (sometimes split into parts, so Members can accept one half of a sentence and reject the other), then on the text as a whole. The “main vote” is the one that adopts or rejects the text itself. Each vote below shows exactly which step it was. How voting works →

Where each group stood at the decisive votes

GroupShift
EPPFor99%For100%consistent
S&DFor98%For99%consistent
RenewFor100%For100%consistent
Greens/EFAFor100%For98%consistent
ECRFor99%For100%consistent
The LeftFor71%For78%consistent
PatriotsFor83%For79%consistent
ESNFor100%For96%consistent
Non-attachedFor78%For70%consistent

Milestones are the votes that adopt or reject text (not every amendment vote) — the percentage is the share of the group’s Members behind that position. Click a column heading to open the vote below.

  1. Show the 16 earlier votes
    1. 22 May 2025Rejected
      On amendment 10 · paragraph 2 · Regulation 2023/956 · sub-point b · point 16 · article 1 · subparagraph 1
      Official label: Article 1, alinéa 1, point 16, sous-point b Règlement (UE) 2023/956 Article 22, § 2, point b - Am 10 · what was voted ↗
      159 for411 against6 abstentions143 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    2. 22 May 2025Rejected
      On amendment 7S · text to be inserted after paragraph 1 · Regulation 2023/956 · sub-point a · point 21 · article 1 · subparagraph 1
      Official label: Article 1, alinéa 1, point 21, sous-point a Règlement (UE) 2023/956 Article 26, après le § 1 - Am 7S= 11S= · what was voted ↗
      105 for462 against14 abstentions138 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    3. 22 May 2025Rejected
      On amendment 15 · paragraph 1 · Regulation 2023/956 · point 23 · article 1
      Official label: Article 1, § 1, après le point 23 Règlement (UE) 2023/956 Article 30, § 2 - Am 15 · what was voted ↗
      103 for438 against47 abstentions131 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    4. 22 May 2025Rejected
      On amendment 25 · Regulation 2023/956 · point 24 · article 1 · subparagraph 1
      Official label: Article 1, alinéa 1, après le point 24 Règlement (UE) 2023/956 après l'article 32 - Am 25 · what was voted ↗
      158 for411 against19 abstentions131 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    5. 22 May 2025Rejected
      On amendment 26 · paragraph 2 · Regulation 2023/956 · sub-point a · point 25 · article 1 · subparagraph 1
      Official label: Article 1, alinéa 1, point 25, sous-point a Règlement (UE) 2023/956 Article 36, § 2, point b - Am 26 · what was voted ↗
      151 for421 against22 abstentions125 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    6. 22 May 2025Rejected
      On amendment 31 · paragraph 2 · Regulation 2023/956 · sub-point a · point 25 · article 1 · subparagraph 1
      Official label: Article 1, alinéa 1, point 25, sous-point a Règlement (UE) 2023/956 Article 36, § 2, point b - Am 31 · what was voted ↗
      187 for387 against17 abstentions128 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    7. 22 May 2025Rejected
      On amendment 12 · the annex I · Regulation 2023/956 · sub-point a · point 2 · subparagraph 1
      Official label: Annexe I, alinéa 1, point 2, sous-point a Règlement (UE) 2023/956 Annexe IV, point 4.1, quatrième phrase - Am 12 · what was voted ↗
      163 for418 against7 abstentions131 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    8. 22 May 2025Rejected
      On amendment 27 · the annex II · Regulation 2023/956 · point 1
      Official label: Annexe II, point 1 Règlement (UE) 2023/956 Annexe VII, point 1 - Am 27 · what was voted ↗
      176 for411 against3 abstentions129 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    9. 22 May 2025Rejected
      On amendment 17 · text to be inserted after recital 1
      Official label: Après le considérant 1 - Am 17 · what was voted ↗
      169 for415 against8 abstentions127 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    10. 22 May 2025Rejected
      On amendment 18 · text to be inserted after recital 1
      Official label: Après le considérant 1 - Am 18 · what was voted ↗
      171 for407 against5 abstentions136 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    11. 22 May 2025Rejected
      On amendment 19 · text to be inserted after recital 1
      Official label: Après le considérant 1 - Am 19 · what was voted ↗
      164 for407 against20 abstentions128 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    12. 22 May 2025Rejected
      On amendment 29 · text to be inserted after recital 1
      Official label: Après le considérant 1 - Am 29 · what was voted ↗
      189 for388 against17 abstentions125 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    13. 22 May 2025Rejected
      On amendment 30 · text to be inserted after recital 1
      Official label: Après le considérant 1 - Am 30 · what was voted ↗
      195 for387 against11 abstentions126 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    14. 22 May 2025Rejected
      On amendment 13 · text to be inserted after recital 27
      Official label: Après le considérant 27 - Am 13 · what was voted ↗
      114 for424 against51 abstentions130 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    15. 22 May 2025Rejected
      On amendment 14 · text to be inserted after recital 27
      Official label: Après le considérant 27 - Am 14 · what was voted ↗
      111 for428 against52 abstentions128 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    16. 22 May 2025Rejected
      On amendment 23 · text to be inserted after recital 27
      Official label: Après le considérant 27 - Am 23 · what was voted ↗
      172 for405 against6 abstentions136 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

  2. 22 May 2025Rejected
    On amendment 9 · text to be inserted after recital 29
    Official label: Après le considérant 29 - Am 9 · what was voted ↗
    171 for414 against9 abstentions125 did not vote
    For
    Against
    Abst.

    Click a group to see each Member’s position.

  3. 22 May 2025Main voteAdopted
    On the Commission proposal (the draft law)
    Official label: Proposition de la Commission · what was voted ↗
    564 for20 against12 abstentions123 did not vote
    For
    Against
    Abst.

    Click a group to see each Member’s position.

  4. 10 Sep 2025Main voteAdopted
    On the provisional agreement negotiated with the Council (the trilogue deal) · amendment 32
    Official label: Accord provisoire - Am 32 · what was voted ↗
    617 for18 against19 abstentions65 did not vote
    For
    Against
    Abst.

    Click a group to see each Member’s position.

Vote data: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL, attribution) / European Parliament · roll-call votes only

Plenary amendments33 tabled on this text

Amendments tabled for the plenary sitting on this text, in their own numbering series. This is a different set from the committee amendments tracked elsewhere on AmendEU, and is not counted in any of the site’s amendment totals.

  1. Amendment 1Proposal for a regulation · Recital 25 a (new)
    Amendment

    (25a) The CBAM applies to importation of electricity, but it should not apply to electricity generated entirely in the exclusive economic zone of an EEA Member State and imported directly into the customs territory of the Union ;

  2. Amendment 2Proposal for a regulation · Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b a (new) · Regulation (EU) 2023/956 · Article 2 – paragraph 3 b (new)
    Amendment

    (ba) the following paragraph 3b is inserted: 3b. By way of derogation from paragraphs 1 and 2, this Regulation shall not apply to electricity generated entirely in the exclusive economic zone of an EEA Member State and imported directly into the customs territory of the Union.

  3. Amendment 3Proposal for a regulation · Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) · Regulation (EU) 2023/956 · Annex IV – point 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 5
    Current text

    EEInpMat are the embedded emissions of the input materials (precursors) consumed in the production process. Only input materials (precursors) listed as relevant to the system boundaries of the production process as specified in the implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 7(7) are to be considered. The relevant EEInpMat are calculated as follows:

    Amendment

    (1a) In point 3, in the notes explaining the formula for SEEg in the first paragraph, the note for EEInpMat is replaced by the following: EEInpMat are the embedded emissions of the input materials (precursors) consumed in the production process. Only input materials (precursors) listed in Annex I and originating in third countries and territories that are not exempted pursuant to Annex III, Point 1 are to be considered. The relevant EEInpMat are calculated as follows:

  4. Amendment 4ECRProposal for a regulation · Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a
    Current text

    1. By 31 August of each year, and for the first time in 2027 for the year 2026, each authorised CBAM declarant shall use the CBAM registry referred to in Article 14 to submit a CBAM declaration for the preceding calendar year.

    Amendment

    1. By 30 September of each year, and for the first time in 2027 for the year 2026, each authorised CBAM declarant shall use the CBAM registry referred to in Article 14 to submit a CBAM declaration for the preceding calendar year.

  5. Amendment 5ECRProposal for a regulation · Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point a
    Current text

    By 31 August of each year, and for the first time in 2027 for the year 2026, the authorised CBAM declarant shall surrender via the CBAM registry a number of CBAM certificates that corresponds to the embedded emissions declared in accordance with Article 6(2), point (c), and verified in accordance with Article 8, for the calendar year preceding the surrender.;

    Amendment

    By 30 September of each year, and for the first time in 2027 for the year 2026, the authorised CBAM declarant shall surrender via the CBAM registry a number of CBAM certificates that corresponds to the embedded emissions declared in accordance with Article 6(2), point (c), and verified in accordance with Article 8, for the calendar year preceding the surrender.;

  6. Amendment 6ECRProposal for a regulation · Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point b
    Current text

    2. From the first quarter of the year 2027, the authorised CBAM declarant shall ensure that the number of CBAM certificates on its account in the CBAM registry at the end of each quarter corresponds to at least 50 % of the embedded emissions in all goods it has imported since the beginning of the calendar year, taking into account the adjustment for free allocation as referred to in Article 31, determined by reference to any of the following:

    Amendment

    2. From 2027, the authorised CBAM declarant shall ensure that the number of CBAM certificates on its account in the CBAM registry at the end of each quarter corresponds to at least 50 % of the embedded emissions in all goods it has imported since the beginning of the calendar year, taking into account the adjustment for free allocation as referred to in Article 31, determined by reference to any of the following:

  7. Amendment 7ECRProposal for a regulation · Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point a
    Current text

    (a) the following paragraph 1a is inserted: ‘1a. The competent authority may decrease the amount of the penalty calculated in accordance with paragraph 1, considering one or more of the following factors: a) the extent of unreported information; b) the level of cooperation and readiness of the authorised CBAM declarant to comply with requests for information; c) the unintentional nature of the behaviour of the authorised CBAM declarant; d) the past compliance of the authorised CBAM declarant.;’

    Amendment

    deleted

  8. Amendment 8ECRProposal for a regulation · Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
    Current text

    When reliable data for the exporting country cannot be applied for a type of goods, the default values shall be based on the average emission intensity of the ten exporting countries with the highest emission intensities for which reliable data can be applied for that type of goods.;

    Amendment

    When reliable data for the exporting country cannot be applied to a type of commodity, the default values will be based on the average emission intensity of the 10% of exporting countries with the highest emission intensities for which reliable data are available for that type of commodity; if the number of exporting countries for which reliable data are available is more than 30, the default values will be based on the average emission intensity of the three countries with the highest emission intensities for which reliable data are available.;

  9. Amendment 9ECRProposal for a regulation · Recital 29 a (new)
    Amendment

    (29 a) It is necessary to ensure effective implementation of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) and to address the remaining regulatory loopholes, which result in circumvention of the established rules and, in consequence, put European production at risk of competitive disadvantage. It is therefore necessary to address the regulatory loopholes, through strict oversight and monitoring of CBAM application, in order to ensure a level playing field between European producers of CBAM goods and third country producers and effectively reduce global emissions.

  10. Amendment 10ECRProposal for a regulation · Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point b
    Current text

    (b) the number of CBAM certificates surrendered in accordance with paragraph 1 for the calendar year preceding the surrender, provided that the customs declaration for the import of goods refers to the same goods by CN code and countries of origin as the CBAM declaration submitted for the preceding calendar year.;

    Amendment

    (b) the number of CBAM certificates surrendered in accordance with paragraph 1 for the calendar year preceding the surrender, provided that the customs declaration for the import of goods refers to the same goods by CN code, same third country operator and countries of origin as the CBAM declaration submitted for the preceding calendar year, provided that the third country operators are registered in the CBAM registry in accordance with Article 10.;

  11. Amendment 11ECRProposal for a regulation · Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point a
    Current text

    (a) the following paragraph 1a is inserted: ‘1a. The competent authority may decrease the amount of the penalty calculated in accordance with paragraph 1, considering one or more of the following factors: a) the extent of unreported information; b) the level of cooperation and readiness of the authorised CBAM declarant to comply with requests for information; c) the unintentional nature of the behaviour of the authorised CBAM declarant; d) the past compliance of the authorised CBAM declarant.;’

    Amendment

    deleted

  12. Amendment 12ECRProposal for a regulation · Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
    Current text

    When reliable data for the exporting country cannot be applied for a type of goods, the default values shall be based on the average emission intensity of the ten exporting countries with the highest emission intensities for which reliable data can be applied for that type of goods.;

    Amendment

    When reliable data for the exporting country cannot be applied for a type of goods, the default values shall be based on the average emission intensity of the 10% of exporting countries with the highest emission intensities for which reliable data can be applied for that type of goods.; if the number of exporting countries for which reliable data are available is higher than 30, the default values shall be based on the average emission intensity of the three countries with the highest emissions intensities for which reliable data are available’;

  13. Amendment 13ECRProposal for a regulation · Recital 27 a (new)
    Amendment

    (27 a) Coking coal is a critical raw material of strategic importance for European industry, which underpins the green and digital transition. Listed under Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 of the European Parliament and of the Council1a, coking coal is of a strategic importance for the overall Union economy, and therefore its internal European production should be promoted. Imports of coking coal from third countries with less stringent environmental legislation in place negatively impact the European domestic production of coking coal and places European producers at a competitive disadvantage and risks undermining Union's climate and industrial objectives. In order to ensure the level playing fie…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  14. Amendment 14ECRProposal for a regulation · Recital 27 b (new)
    Amendment

    (27 b) Soda ash is a fundamental chemical compound that is used in a wide range of industrial processes, including the manufacturing of glass, chemicals, detergents and metallurgical operations. The production of soda ash is highly energy-intensive and, within the Union, is subject to stringent climate and energy legislation, notably the obligations under Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council1a. Soda ash is imported from third countries with less stringent climate and energy legislation and significantly lower energy prices, which places Union producers of soda ash at a competitive disadvantage and risks encouraging carbon leakage. Therefore, the Commission shoul…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  15. Amendment 15ECRProposal for a regulation · Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 23 a (new)
    Amendment

    (23 a) in Article 30, paragraph 2 is amended as follows: (a) the first subparagraph is replaced by the following: 'Before the end of the transitional period referred to in Article 32, the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the application of this Regulation. The report shall be accompagnied by a legislative proposal.' (b) the second subparagraph, point (a)(iii), is replaced by the following: '(iii) goods at risk of carbon leakage other than those listed in Annex I, and specifically organic chemicals, polymers, soda ash and coking coal';

  16. Amendment 16PfEProposal for a regulation · Recital 1
    Current text

    (1) During the transitional period, which started on 1 October 2023, the Commission has been collecting data and information on the implementation of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (‘CBAM’) as provided for in Regulation (EU) 2023/956 of the European Parliament and of the Council3 , including through the analysis of quarterly reports submitted by reporting declarants. The information collected and the exchanges with the stakeholders, including as part of the expert group on the CBAM, have outlined possibilities for simplifications and improvement of the CBAM. The Union is committed to ensure a smooth roll-out of the CBAM during the post-transitional period starting on 1 January 2026.…

    Amendment

    (1) During the transitional period, which started on 1 October 2023, the Commission has been collecting data and information on the implementation of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (‘CBAM’) as provided for in Regulation (EU) 2023/956 of the European Parliament and of the Council3 , including through the analysis of quarterly reports submitted by reporting declarants. The information collected and the exchanges with the stakeholders, including as part of the expert group on the CBAM, have outlined possibilities for simplifications and improvement of the CBAM. The Union is committed to ensure a smooth roll-out of the CBAM during the post-transitional period that will start when the leg…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  17. Amendment 17PfEProposal for a regulation · Recital 1 a (new)
    Amendment

    (1 a) Union industries exporting goods that fall within the scope of the CBAM are not compensated for the high and constantly increasing costs incurred by the EU ETS or protected from possible retaliatory measures imposed by trading partners. In the context of the comprehensive review, the Commission will introduce an export adjustment mechanism, address the issue of circumventing measures, and guarantee that CBAM exporters are protected from third countries' retaliatory measures.

  18. Amendment 18PfEProposal for a regulation · Recital 1 b (new)
    Amendment

    (1 b) The Union is the only major region in the world to have introduced a significant price on CO2, but the incentive effect of such a carbon pricing on trading partners has not been clearly demonstrated. The introduction of the CBAM is causing concerns among Union economic actors, particularly the energy-intensive industries already pressured by the Union's excessive environmental legislation. In the context of the comprehensive review, the Commission will remove the phase-out of the free allowances under the EU ETS if a level playing field is not ensured.

  19. Amendment 19PfEProposal for a regulation · Recital 1 c (new)
    Amendment

    (1 c) The CBAM has been introduced to compensate the effect of the EU ETS in order to address carbon leakage. As currently designed, the CBAM will not ensure a level playing field. For those reasons, the Commission will review the EU ETS and the CBAM by the end of 2025 for a potential deletion of these two measures.

  20. Amendment 20PfEProposal for a regulation · Recital 3
    Current text

    (3) A new threshold based on cumulative mass per importer per year should be introduced in Regulation (EU) 2023/956, ensuring that more than 99% of emissions are maintained in scope. This is a robust and targeted approach as it accurately reflects the environmental nature of the CBAM by taking into account all imported emissions over a period of time in determining the threshold. It also eliminates the risk of circumvention through the artificial splitting of consignments by a single importer.

    Amendment

    (3) A new threshold based on cumulative mass per importer per year should be introduced in Regulation (EU) 2023/956, ensuring that 98% of emissions are maintained in scope. This is a robust and targeted approach as it accurately reflects the environmental nature of the CBAM by taking into account all imported emissions over a period of time in determining the threshold. It also eliminates the risk of circumvention through the artificial splitting of consignments by a single importer.

  21. Amendment 21PfEProposal for a regulation · Recital 4
    Current text

    (4) A mass-based threshold reflecting the average emissions intensity of the volume of imported CBAM goods would better translate the climate objective of the CBAM. A single mass-based threshold applying cumulatively to all CBAM goods in the iron and steel, aluminium, fertilisers and cement sectors imported by importers during a calendar year is the simplest design for importers, as they will not have to obtain or provide any data additional to those provided in the customs declaration, thereby reducing substantially any CBAM-related administrative burden for these importers. A threshold set at a level of 50 tonnes will exempt the vast majority of importers from obligations under Regulation…

    Amendment

    (4) A mass-based threshold reflecting the average emissions intensity of the volume of imported CBAM goods would better translate the climate objective of the CBAM. A single mass-based threshold applying cumulatively to all CBAM goods in the iron and steel, aluminium, fertilisers and cement sectors imported by importers during a calendar year is the simplest design for importers, as they will not have to obtain or provide any data additional to those provided in the customs declaration, thereby reducing substantially any CBAM-related administrative burden for these importers. A threshold set at a level of 110 tonnes will exempt the vast majority of importers from obligations under Regulation…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  22. Amendment 22PfEProposal for a regulation · Recital 27 a (new)
    Amendment

    (27 a) A safeguard mechanism shall be introduced in order to suspend the application of the CBAM if clear and substantiated evidence demonstrates that its implementation significantly distorts competition or leads to commercial retaliation from third countries or if no viable, sustainable, and low-cost technological alternatives are currently available on the European market.

  23. Amendment 23PfEProposal for a regulation · Recital 27 b (new)
    Amendment

    (27 b) Revenues generated from the application of the CBAM shall not be allocated to the general budget of the Union. Those revenues shall remain under the responsibility of the Member States where they are collected and shall be used exclusively for domestic purposes, in particular to support industries and sectors most affected by the Union's environmental policies.

  24. Amendment 24PfEProposal for a regulation · Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
    Current text

    The threshold laid down in point 1 of Annex VII shall ensure that at least 99% of the emissions embedded in the imported goods and processed products pursuant to Article 2(1) and (2) are not covered by the derogation referred to in the first subparagraph.

    Amendment

    The threshold laid down in point 1 of Annex VII shall ensure that 98% of the emissions embedded in the imported goods and processed products pursuant to Article 2(1) and (2) are not covered by the derogation referred to in the first subparagraph.

  25. Amendment 25PfEProposal for a regulation · Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 24 a (new)
    Amendment

    (24 a) the following article is inserted: 'Article 32a The Commission shall suspend the application of this Regulation in the following cases: (a) where clear and substantiated evidence demonstrates that its implementation significantly distorts competition or leads to retaliation from third countries;or (b) where no viable, sustainable, and low-cost technological alternatives are currently available on the Union market.'

  26. Amendment 26PfEProposal for a regulation · Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25 – point a
    Current text

    Article 2(2) and Articles 4, 6 to 9, 15 and 19, Articles 21 to 22(1), Article 22(3), Articles 27 and 31 shall apply from 1 January 2026.;

    Amendment

    Article 2(2) and Articles 4, 6 to 9, 15 and 19, Articles 21 to 22(1), Article 22(3), Articles 27 and 31 shall apply after the entry into force of the legislative proposal following the comprehensive review.;

  27. Amendment 27PfEProposal for a regulation · Annex II – paragraph 1
    Current text

    1. The threshold referred to in Article 2(3a) shall be set at 50 tonnes of net mass.

    Amendment

    1. The threshold referred to in Article 2(3a) shall be set at 110 tonnes of net mass.

  28. Amendment 28PfEProposal for a regulation · Annex II – paragraph 2
    Current text

    2. For determining the threshold, the following methodology shall be applied: 𝑸̅ 𝒄𝒉𝒐𝒔𝒆𝒏 𝒔𝒖𝒄𝒉 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 ∑ 𝑬𝒎𝒊 𝑵 𝒊=𝟏 × 𝟏_(𝑸𝒊 > 𝑸̅) 𝑻𝒐𝒕𝒂𝒍 𝒆𝒎𝒊𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 ≥ 𝒕𝒂𝒓𝒈𝒆𝒕 𝒔𝒉𝒂𝒓𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒆𝒎𝒊𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝟗𝟗% Where: – 𝑄̅ is the mass-threshold in tonnes allowing to capture a given target share of emissions; – Annual emissions per importer; 𝑖, 𝐸𝑚𝑖 = ∑ 𝑞𝑖,𝑗𝐸𝐼𝑗 𝐽𝑖 𝑗=1 ; – 𝑞𝑖,𝑗 is the imported volume in tonnes by importer 𝑖 of the CN code 𝑗; – 𝐽𝑖 is the number of CN codes imported by importer 𝑖 among the four sectors considered (aluminium, cement, fertilisers, iron and steel); – 𝐸𝐼𝑗 is the emission intensity for CN code 𝑗 1 ; – 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠: the total emissions in CO2 of the four CBAM sectors considered, that is the sum of cor…

    Amendment

    2. For determining the threshold, the following methodology shall be applied: 𝑸̅ 𝒄𝒉𝒐𝒔𝒆𝒏 𝒔𝒖𝒄𝒉 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 ∑ 𝑬𝒎𝒊 𝑵 𝒊=𝟏 × 𝟏_(𝑸𝒊 > 𝑸̅) 𝑻𝒐𝒕𝒂𝒍 𝒆𝒎𝒊𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 ≥ 𝒕𝒂𝒓𝒈𝒆𝒕 𝒔𝒉𝒂𝒓𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒆𝒎𝒊𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝟗8% Where: – 𝑄̅ is the mass-threshold in tonnes allowing to capture a given target share of emissions; – Annual emissions per importer; 𝑖, 𝐸𝑚𝑖 = ∑ 𝑞𝑖,𝑗𝐸𝐼𝑗 𝐽𝑖 𝑗=1 ; – 𝑞𝑖,𝑗 is the imported volume in tonnes by importer 𝑖 of the CN code 𝑗; – 𝐽𝑖 is the number of CN codes imported by importer 𝑖 among the four sectors considered (aluminium, cement, fertilisers, iron and steel); – 𝐸𝐼𝑗 is the emission intensity for CN code 𝑗 1 ; – 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠: the total emissions in CO2 of the four CBAM sectors considered, that is the sum of cor…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  29. Amendment 29ECRProposal for a regulation · Recital 1 a (new)
    Amendment

    (1 a) The structural issues threatening the aluminium industry continue to be unadressed making the CBAM an ineffective tool for preventing carbon leakage in the aluminium sector, and creating substantial problems for the European aluminium supply chain — a highly energy-intensive and complex industry that operates as a price-taker in extremely competitive global markets, where Europe relies on imports for more than half of its needs. It is therefore necessary to suspend the implementation of the CBAM final phase and the phasing-out of free allowances for the aluminium sector until solutions are adopted in the future review of Regulation (EU) 2023/956 which fully assess the competitiveness o…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  30. Amendment 30ECRProposal for a regulation · Recital 1 b (new)
    Amendment

    (1 b) To avoid unfair competitivity for exporters of goods listed in Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2023/956, ETS free allocations and indirect cost compensation should be maintained at current levels.

  31. Amendment 31ECRProposal for a regulation · Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25 – point a
    Current text

    Article 2(2) and Articles 4, 6 to 9, 15 and 19, Articles 21 to 22(1), Article 22(3), Articles 27 and 31 shall apply from 1 January 2026.;

    Amendment

    Article 2(2) and Articles 4, 6 to 9, 15 and 19, Articles 21 to 22(1), Article 22(3), Articles 27 and 31 shall apply from 1 January 2026, except for aluminium goods listed in Annex I which need complementary measures to avoid carbon leakages and unfair competitiveness from third countries.;

  32. Amendment 32ENVIProposal for a regulation

    Replaces or inserts a longer passage — full text in the official document.

  33. Amendment 33ESNProposal for a regulation · Recital 2 a (new)
    Amendment

    (2 a) In order to avoid exacerbating distortions of competition, simplifications and exemptions at least equivalent to those granted to importers should be adopted in the emissions trading system (EU ETS) for companies producing in Europe.

Full record

Members who amended this procedure

38 Members · by amendment count

The amendments, in full text

73 amendments

Every amendment as tabled — original text, proposed change and justification, with a link to the official PDF.

The full amendment texts load as you scroll here.
Report a data issue