Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville
The dossier addresses financing for development ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville. Amendments cite the Sustainable Development Goals and the 2030 Agenda being off-track, extreme poverty and inequality, the gender-poverty gap, the SDG financing gap, sovereign debt restructuring, official development assistance and the 0.7% of GNI target, partnership agreements with African, Caribbean and Pacific states, and donors abandoning development commitments.
Plenary votes
19 roll-call votesIn plenary, Parliament usually votes in steps: first on amendments to the text (sometimes split into parts, so Members can accept one half of a sentence and reject the other), then on the text as a whole. The “main vote” is the one that adopts or rejects the text itself. Each vote below shows exactly which step it was. How voting works →
Show the 16 earlier votes
- 17 Jun 2025RejectedOn the motion for a resolution · amendment 1Official label: Proposition de résolution de remplacement - Am 1 · what was voted ↗120 for480 against65 abstentions54 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 17 Jun 2025RejectedOn paragraph 1Official label: § 1 · what was voted ↗304 for305 against55 abstentions55 did not voteDecided by 1 vote. The contested ground: Patriots (38 abstentions) · EPP (split 10 For / 160 Against) · Non-attached (split 11 For / 9 Against)
Broke with their group’s line23 Members voted against their group’s majority
Dimitris TSIODRASEPPVoted For
Eleonora MELETIEPPVoted For
Elissavet VOZEMBERG-VRIONIDIEPPVoted For
Emmanouil KEFALOGIANNISEPPVoted For
Giusi PRINCIEPPVoted For
Manuela RIPAEPPVoted For
Maria WALSHEPPVoted For
Niels Flemming HANSENEPPVoted For
Individual positions: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL). A group’s line = the majority of its expressed votes.
ForAgainstAbst.Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 17 Jun 2025RejectedOn paragraph 20Official label: § 20 · what was voted ↗281 for361 against21 abstentions56 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 17 Jun 2025RejectedOn paragraph 24Official label: § 24 · what was voted ↗278 for371 against15 abstentions55 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 17 Jun 2025RejectedOn paragraph 33Official label: § 33 · what was voted ↗303 for328 against24 abstentions64 did not voteDecided by 25 votes.
Broke with their group’s line23 Members voted against their group’s majority
Assita KANKOECRVoted For
Johan VAN OVERTVELDTECRVoted For
Kris VAN DIJCKECRVoted For
Eleonora MELETIEPPVoted For
Elissavet VOZEMBERG-VRIONIDIEPPVoted For
Giusi PRINCIEPPVoted For
Loucas FOURLASEPPVoted For
Manuela RIPAEPPVoted For
Individual positions: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL). A group’s line = the majority of its expressed votes.
ForAgainstAbst.Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 17 Jun 2025AdoptedOn paragraph 39Official label: § 39 · what was voted ↗475 for181 against9 abstentions54 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 17 Jun 2025RejectedOn amendment 2 · paragraph 40Official label: § 40 - Am 2 · what was voted ↗296 for339 against31 abstentions53 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 17 Jun 2025RejectedOn paragraph 42Official label: § 42 · what was voted ↗290 for357 against17 abstentions55 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 17 Jun 2025AdoptedOn paragraph 43Official label: § 43 · what was voted ↗361 for244 against60 abstentions54 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 17 Jun 2025RejectedOn paragraph 44Official label: § 44 · what was voted ↗280 for322 against62 abstentions55 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 17 Jun 2025AdoptedOn paragraph 53Official label: § 53 · what was voted ↗312 for295 against57 abstentions55 did not voteDecided by 17 votes. The contested ground: ECR (split 24 For / 19 Against) · EPP (split 10 For / 168 Against) · Non-attached (split 11 For / 9 Against)
Broke with their group’s line44 Members voted against their group’s majority
Alexandr VONDRAECRVoted Against
Assita KANKOECRVoted Against
Beatrice TIMGRENECRVoted Against
Charlie WEIMERSECRVoted Against
Claudiu-Richard TÂRZIUECRVoted Against
Cristian TERHEŞECRVoted Against
Dick ERIXONECRVoted Against
Geadis GEADIECRVoted Against
Individual positions: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL). A group’s line = the majority of its expressed votes.
ForAgainstAbst.Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 17 Jun 2025RejectedOn paragraph 55Official label: § 55 · what was voted ↗289 for347 against25 abstentions58 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 17 Jun 2025RejectedOn paragraph 64Official label: § 64 · what was voted ↗300 for339 against27 abstentions53 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 17 Jun 2025AdoptedOn paragraph 66 (part 1 of a split vote)Official label: § 66/1 · what was voted ↗591 for46 against32 abstentions50 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 17 Jun 2025AdoptedOn paragraph 66 (part 2 of a split vote)Official label: § 66/2 · what was voted ↗327 for250 against81 abstentions61 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 17 Jun 2025AdoptedOn paragraph 67 (part 1 of a split vote)Official label: § 67/1 · what was voted ↗585 for43 against35 abstentions56 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 17 Jun 2025AdoptedOn paragraph 67 (part 2 of a split vote)Official label: § 67/2 · what was voted ↗321 for272 against64 abstentions62 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 17 Jun 2025RejectedOn paragraph 69Official label: § 69 · what was voted ↗291 for356 against16 abstentions56 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 17 Jun 2025RejectedOn the motion for a resolution · the text as a whole · the DEVE committeeOfficial label: Proposition de résolution de la commission DEVE (ensemble du texte) · what was voted ↗282 for340 against26 abstentions71 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
Vote data: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL, attribution) / European Parliament · roll-call votes only
Plenary amendments2 tabled on this text
Amendments tabled for the plenary sitting on this text, in their own numbering series. This is a different set from the committee amendments tracked elsewhere on AmendEU, and is not counted in any of the site’s amendment totals.
- Amendment 1ESNMotion for a resolution (Rule 188(3) of the Rules of Procedure) replacing non-legislative motion for a resolution A10-0101/2025 · European Parliament resolution on financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville
Replaces or inserts a longer passage — full text in the official document.
- Amendment 2Motion for a resolution · Paragraph 40Current text
40. Insists that a conducive business enabling environment is essential for private investment, including through the rule of law, transparency, good governance, anti-corruption measures, investor and consumer protection, and fair competition; calls on the Commission to monitor and further improve mechanisms that will provide a security guarantee for European investors, on the other hand, stresses the need to rebalance investors’ rights with obligations towards the host state i.e. by supporting the local economy through technology transfer and by utilising local labour and inputs, so as to ensure that FDI translates into wider socio-economic benefits for society; calls for
furtherimproveda…Amendment40. Insists that a conducive business enabling environment is essential for private investment, including through the rule of law, transparency, good governance, anti-corruption measures, investor and consumer protection, and fair competition; calls on the Commission to monitor and further improve mechanisms that will provide a security guarantee for European investors, on the other hand, stresses the need to rebalance investors’ rights with obligations towards the host state i.e. by supporting the local economy through technology transfer and by utilising local labour and inputs, so as to ensure that FDI translates into wider socio-economic benefits for society; calls for gender budgeting a…
Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
Official amendment documents
Members who amended this procedure
17 Members · by amendment count
















The amendments, in full text
323 amendmentsEvery amendment as tabled — original text, proposed change and justification, with a link to the official PDF.