How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?
Own-initiative report on securing a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector amid food security, farmers' resilience and animal diseases. Amendments cite Article 13 TFEU on animal sentience and the 'End the Cage Age' Citizens' Initiative, debate the sector's economic weight (EUR 214.3 billion in 2023), its greenhouse gas emissions and environmental effects, grassland and extensive systems, caged animals, vaccination, and Eurobarometer animal-welfare findings.
Procedure timeline
- Committee amendments tabled14 Jul 2025 – 15 Jul 2025
- Plenary vote — Adopted30 Apr 2026 · On the motion for a resolution · the text as a whole
Plenary votes
9 roll-call votesIn plenary, Parliament usually votes in steps: first on amendments to the text (sometimes split into parts, so Members can accept one half of a sentence and reject the other), then on the text as a whole. The “main vote” is the one that adopts or rejects the text itself. Each vote below shows exactly which step it was. How voting works →
Show the 6 earlier votes
- 30 Apr 2026RejectedOn amendment 1 · text to be inserted after paragraph 11Official label: Après le § 11 - Am 1 · what was voted ↗193 for376 against12 abstentions138 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 30 Apr 2026RejectedOn amendment 2 · text to be inserted after paragraph 15Official label: Après le § 15 - Am 2 · what was voted ↗149 for406 against30 abstentions134 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 30 Apr 2026RejectedOn amendment 3 · text to be inserted after paragraph 18Official label: Après le § 18 - Am 3 · what was voted ↗226 for325 against28 abstentions140 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 30 Apr 2026AdoptedOn amendment 4 · text to be inserted after paragraph 27Official label: Après le § 27 - Am 4 · what was voted ↗330 for218 against35 abstentions136 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 30 Apr 2026RejectedOn amendment 5 · text to be inserted after paragraph 37Official label: Après le § 37 - Am 5 · what was voted ↗175 for375 against33 abstentions136 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 30 Apr 2026RejectedOn amendment 6 · text to be inserted after paragraph 37Official label: Après le § 37 - Am 6 · what was voted ↗131 for418 against34 abstentions136 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 30 Apr 2026RejectedOn amendment 7 · text to be inserted after paragraph 39Official label: Après le § 39 - Am 7 · what was voted ↗195 for334 against52 abstentions138 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 30 Apr 2026RejectedOn amendment 8 · text to be inserted after paragraph 46Official label: Après le § 46 - Am 8 · what was voted ↗244 for297 against41 abstentions137 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 30 Apr 2026Main voteAdoptedOn the motion for a resolution · the text as a wholeOfficial label: Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) · what was voted ↗426 for119 against40 abstentions134 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
Vote data: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL, attribution) / European Parliament · roll-call votes only
Plenary amendments9 tabled on this text
Amendments tabled for the plenary sitting on this text, in their own numbering series. This is a different set from the committee amendments tracked elsewhere on AmendEU, and is not counted in any of the site’s amendment totals.
- Amendment 1Motion for a resolution · Paragraph 11 a (new)Amendment
11a. Urges the Commission to come forward with an integrated and holistic European food policy that ensures alignment between all policies that affect food production and consumption in the EU and addresses interconnected challenges such as public health and climate change;
- Amendment 2Motion for a resolution · Paragraph 15 a (new)Amendment
15a. Stresses that intensive livestock farming is a major contributor to soil and water pollution and significantly contributes to higher greenhouse gas emissions, thus reducing biodiversity in the EU;
- Amendment 3Motion for a resolution · Paragraph 18 a (new)Amendment
18a. Stresses that the concerning level of concentration in the processing and retail sectors of the livestock value chain contributes to farmers’ precarious situation; calls on the Commission to strictly implement anti-trust legislation in these sectors by using all available tools at its disposal;
- Amendment 4Motion for a resolution · Paragraph 27 a (new)Amendment
27a. Calls for the incentivisation of extensive and grass-based livestock farming, particularly under the CAP;
- Amendment 5Motion for a resolution · Paragraph 37 a (new)Amendment
37a. Expresses its concerns over the ineffective implementation and poor enforcement of current EU animal welfare legislation;
- Amendment 6Motion for a resolution · Paragraph 37 b (new)Amendment
37b. Underlines the importance of a shift towards plant-based food consumption, better animal welfare during the entire production cycle, and the promotion of higher animal welfare standards both internationally and domestically;
- Amendment 7Motion for a resolution · Paragraph 39 a (new)Amendment
39a. Calls on the Commission to propose a harmonised and mandatory system for method-of-production and origin labelling that provides information on farming, transport and slaughter methods, and information on the welfare of animals throughout their entire life cycles;
- Amendment 8Motion for a resolution · Paragraph 46 a (new)Amendment
46a. Emphasises, in particular, the essential role of hedgerows in livestock farming landscapes, especially in bocage systems, as key agroecological infrastructure that provide multiple ecosystem services, including biodiversity conservation, carbon sequestration, water retention, shelter for animals and landscape quality; stresses that the preservation and restoration of hedge networks must be recognised as an integral part of sustainable livestock farming and rural heritage, and must receive financial support;
- Amendment 9Motion for a resolution · Paragraph 107 a (new)Amendment
107a. Considers that the cumulative impact of the EU-Mercosur Agreement and the EU-Australia Agreement, which will substantially increase imports of beef from Mercosur countries and of beef and sheep from Australia into the EU, will put EU farmers under further strain, especially in certain sensitive product sectors, particularly in the high-quality beef sector; notes with concern that the EU-Mercosur Agreement does not ensure converging safety standards;
Official amendment documents
Members who amended this procedure
46 Members · by amendment count
























The amendments, in full text
715 amendmentsEvery amendment as tabled — original text, proposed change and justification, with a link to the official PDF.