This own-initiative report addresses the development of a new EU anti-poverty strategy. The amendments are largely citations added to the recitals (Treaty articles, the European Pillar of Social Rights, ILO and UN conventions, the Social Climate Fund, Roma equality), and call on the Commission and Member States to increase public investment in universal, affordable public services such as education, healthcare, social protection, housing, water, energy and transport.
Procedure timeline
- Committee amendments tabled4 Jul 2025 – 24 Jul 2025
- Plenary vote — Adopted12 Feb 2026 · On the motion for a resolution · the text as a whole
Plenary votes
24 roll-call votesIn plenary, Parliament usually votes in steps: first on amendments to the text (sometimes split into parts, so Members can accept one half of a sentence and reject the other), then on the text as a whole. The “main vote” is the one that adopts or rejects the text itself. Each vote below shows exactly which step it was. How voting works →
Show the 21 earlier votes
- 12 Feb 2026RejectedOn the motion for a resolution · amendment 1Official label: Proposition de résolution de remplacement - Am 1 · what was voted ↗157 for411 against14 abstentions137 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Feb 2026AdoptedOn paragraph 2Official label: § 2 · what was voted ↗294 for282 against6 abstentions137 did not voteDecided by 12 votes. The contested ground: EPP (split 26 For / 118 Against) · Non-attached (split 14 For / 10 Against)
Broke with their group’s line41 Members voted against their group’s majority
Jacek OZDOBAECRVoted For
Tobiasz BOCHEŃSKIECRVoted For
Waldemar TOMASZEWSKIECRVoted For
Adam JARUBASEPPVoted For
Andrzej BUŁAEPPVoted For
Bartosz ARŁUKOWICZEPPVoted For
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKIEPPVoted For
Borys BUDKAEPPVoted For
Individual positions: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL). A group’s line = the majority of its expressed votes.
ForAgainstAbst.Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Feb 2026AdoptedOn paragraph 4 (part 1 of a split vote)Official label: § 4/1 · what was voted ↗410 for119 against53 abstentions137 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Feb 2026RejectedOn paragraph 4 (part 2 of a split vote)Official label: § 4/2 · what was voted ↗274 for298 against10 abstentions137 did not voteDecided by 24 votes.
Broke with their group’s line23 Members voted against their group’s majority
Hélder SOUSA SILVAEPPVoted For
Jüri RATASEPPVoted For
Liesbet SOMMENEPPVoted For
Lídia PEREIRAEPPVoted For
Manuela RIPAEPPVoted For
Marta WCISŁOEPPVoted For
Mirosława NYKIELEPPVoted For
Paulo CUNHAEPPVoted For
Individual positions: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL). A group’s line = the majority of its expressed votes.
ForAgainstAbst.Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Feb 2026RejectedOn paragraph 16Official label: § 16 · what was voted ↗245 for332 against5 abstentions137 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Feb 2026RejectedOn paragraph 17Official label: § 17 · what was voted ↗247 for291 against43 abstentions138 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Feb 2026AdoptedOn paragraph 22 (part 1 of a split vote)Official label: § 22/1 · what was voted ↗377 for166 against35 abstentions141 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Feb 2026AdoptedOn paragraph 22 (part 2 of a split vote)Official label: § 22/2 · what was voted ↗276 for262 against36 abstentions145 did not voteDecided by 14 votes. The contested ground: EPP (split 29 For / 109 Against) · Renew (split 42 For / 19 Against) · ECR (17 abstentions)
Broke with their group’s line56 Members voted against their group’s majority
Geadis GEADIECRVoted For
Waldemar TOMASZEWSKIECRVoted For
Adam JARUBASEPPVoted For
Andrey KOVATCHEVEPPVoted For
Andrzej BUŁAEPPVoted For
Bartosz ARŁUKOWICZEPPVoted For
Bartłomiej SIENKIEWICZEPPVoted For
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKIEPPVoted For
Individual positions: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL). A group’s line = the majority of its expressed votes.
ForAgainstAbst.Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Feb 2026AdoptedOn amendment 6 · paragraph 31Official label: § 31 - Am 6 · what was voted ↗284 for281 against17 abstentions137 did not voteDecided by 3 votes. The contested ground: EPP (split 28 For / 113 Against) · Renew (split 50 For / 13 Against) · Patriots (9 abstentions)
Broke with their group’s line50 Members voted against their group’s majority
Adam JARUBASEPPVoted For
Andrzej BUŁAEPPVoted For
Bartosz ARŁUKOWICZEPPVoted For
Bartłomiej SIENKIEWICZEPPVoted For
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKIEPPVoted For
Borys BUDKAEPPVoted For
Dariusz JOŃSKIEPPVoted For
David CASAEPPVoted For
Individual positions: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL). A group’s line = the majority of its expressed votes.
ForAgainstAbst.Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Feb 2026AdoptedOn amendment 3 · text to be inserted after paragraph 35Official label: Après le § 35 - Am 3 · what was voted ↗400 for111 against67 abstentions141 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Feb 2026RejectedOn amendment 11 · text to be inserted after paragraph 46Official label: Après le § 46 - Am 11 · what was voted ↗251 for309 against20 abstentions139 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Feb 2026AdoptedOn amendment 8 · text to be inserted after paragraph 47Official label: Après le § 47 - Am 8 · what was voted ↗291 for238 against50 abstentions140 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Feb 2026AdoptedOn amendment 4 · text to be inserted after paragraph 48Official label: Après le § 48 - Am 4 · what was voted ↗421 for74 against83 abstentions141 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Feb 2026AdoptedOn amendment 7 · paragraph 50Official label: § 50 - Am 7 · what was voted ↗309 for236 against28 abstentions146 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Feb 2026AdoptedOn amendment 5 · text to be inserted after paragraph 55Official label: Après le § 55 - Am 5 · what was voted ↗491 for13 against74 abstentions141 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Feb 2026RejectedOn amendment 9 · text to be inserted after paragraph 63Official label: Après le § 63 - Am 9 · what was voted ↗261 for266 against51 abstentions141 did not voteDecided by 5 votes. The contested ground: Patriots (38 abstentions) · EPP (12 abstentions) · Renew (split 49 For / 12 Against)
Broke with their group’s line27 Members voted against their group’s majority
Geadis GEADIECRVoted For
Waldemar TOMASZEWSKIECRVoted For
Daniel BUDAEPPVoted For
Fredis BELERISEPPVoted For
Liesbet SOMMENEPPVoted For
Wouter BEKEEPPVoted For
Alvise PÉREZNon-attachedVoted Against
Diana IOVANOVICI ŞOŞOACĂNon-attachedVoted Against
Individual positions: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL). A group’s line = the majority of its expressed votes.
ForAgainstAbst.Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Feb 2026RejectedOn paragraph 64Official label: § 64 · what was voted ↗253 for317 against9 abstentions140 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Feb 2026RejectedOn paragraph 65Official label: § 65 · what was voted ↗253 for320 against8 abstentions138 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Feb 2026AdoptedOn recital DOfficial label: Considérant D/1 · what was voted ↗426 for72 against82 abstentions139 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Feb 2026RejectedOn recital DOfficial label: Considérant D/2 · what was voted ↗220 for319 against39 abstentions141 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Feb 2026AdoptedOn recital OOfficial label: Considérant O/1 · what was voted ↗397 for133 against49 abstentions140 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Feb 2026RejectedOn recital OOfficial label: Considérant O/2 · what was voted ↗269 for302 against5 abstentions143 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Feb 2026RejectedOn amendment 10 · text to be inserted after recital AGOfficial label: Après le considérant AG - Am 10 · what was voted ↗265 for273 against42 abstentions139 did not voteDecided by 8 votes. The contested ground: Patriots (32 abstentions) · Renew (split 51 For / 8 Against) · Non-attached (split 15 For / 8 Against)
Broke with their group’s line23 Members voted against their group’s majority
Assita KANKOECRVoted For
Kris VAN DIJCKECRVoted For
Daniel BUDAEPPVoted For
Jan FARSKÝEPPVoted For
Manuela RIPAEPPVoted For
Marco FALCONEEPPVoted For
Sirpa PIETIKÄINENEPPVoted For
Alvise PÉREZNon-attachedVoted Against
Individual positions: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL). A group’s line = the majority of its expressed votes.
ForAgainstAbst.Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 12 Feb 2026Main voteAdoptedOn the motion for a resolution · the text as a wholeOfficial label: Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) · what was voted ↗385 for141 against53 abstentions140 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
Vote data: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL, attribution) / European Parliament · roll-call votes only
Plenary amendments13 tabled on this text
Amendments tabled for the plenary sitting on this text, in their own numbering series. This is a different set from the committee amendments tracked elsewhere on AmendEU, and is not counted in any of the site’s amendment totals.
- Amendment 1PfEMotion for a resolution (Rule 188(3) of the Rules of Procedure) replacing non-legislative motion for a resolution A10-0260/2025 · European Parliament resolution on developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy
Replaces or inserts a longer passage — full text in the official document.
- Amendment 2ECRMotion for a resolution (Rule 188(3) of the Rules of Procedure) replacing non-legislative motion for a resolution A10-0260/2025 · European Parliament resolution on developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy
Replaces or inserts a longer passage — full text in the official document.
- Amendment 3Motion for a resolution · Paragraph 35 a (new)Amendment
35a. Stresses the importance of overcoming administrative obstacles that may prevent vulnerable groups, such as Roma, from accessing essential services and social protection, as these barriers perpetuate and exacerbate poverty and exclusion; underlines that national identification numbers could facilitate equal access to essential services while maintaining administrative clarity and accountability;
- Amendment 4Motion for a resolution · Paragraph 48 a (new)Amendment
48a. Welcomes the recent update of the monitoring framework for the European Child Guarantee1a and the inclusion within the framework of new indicators to improve the effectiveness of monitoring progress in the implementation of this instrument in the Member States; underlines the important role of data collection and monitoring systems in understanding the obstacles faced by vulnerable children and in enabling tailored interventions and resource allocation; calls on the Social Protection Committee to continue its work to improve the monitoring framework in order to maintain its relevance and address remaining data gaps and on Member States to use this common monitoring framework while adapt…
Excerpt — full text in the official PDF. - Amendment 5Motion for a resolution · Paragraph 55 a (new)Amendment
55a. Recalls the EU objective of transitioning from institutional to community or family-based care; recognises the opportunity provided by the anti-poverty strategy to build bridges with the European Child Guarantee, in particular with measures to support the target group of children in institutional care; calls on the Member States to make full use of the ESF+, as well as other relevant European and national funds, in order to finalise the deinstitutionalisation process so as to ensure that children can live in a family or community environment;
- Amendment 6Motion for a resolution · Paragraph 31Current text
31.
Notesthatalackofadequateaccesstomenstrualhygieneproductsandfacilitiesaffectsan estimated 10 % of the menstruatingpopulation,anddisproportionatelyaffectsmarginalisedand vulnerablegroups,limitingparticipation in social, educational and professional life; calls on the CommissionandtheMemberStatestoproposecomprehensivemeasurestotacklethis,ensuring free or affordable access to menstrual products,includingthroughadequatefacilitiesintheworkplaceandinschools;Amendment31. Recognises menstrual poverty as a structural form of poverty and gender inequality in the EU, affecting an estimated 10 % of the menstruating population; underlines its disproportionate impact on women and girls on low-income, refugees, asylum seekers, young people, homeless people, persons with disabilities, and others in vulnerable situations; stresses that menstrual poverty seriously limits participation in social, educational and professional life; calls on the Commission to develop a comprehensive action plan as part of the EU anti-poverty strategy, ensuring free or affordable access to menstrual products, information and adequate sanitary facilities, particularly in public places s…
Excerpt — full text in the official PDF. - Amendment 7Motion for a resolution · Paragraph 50Current text
50. Calls on the Commission to ensure
thattheEuropean Child Guaranteehasa dedicated budgetof at least EUR 20 billion inthe2028-2034MFF,implemented through the ESF+, in order to respond to the growing challenges of child poverty and social exclusion, and for the Member States to allocate at least 5 % of ESF+ funds to specific projects and structural investments combating child poverty, with at least 10 % earmarked for the Member States with child poverty and social exclusion levels exceeding the EU average; emphasises that this investment in the next generation, in addition to ensuring the well-being of children, is a sound investment that would prevent future societal costs61;stres…Amendment50. Calls on the Commission to ensure the allocation of a substantial dedicated budget to the European Child Guarantee, implemented through the ESF+, in order to respond to the growing challenges of child poverty and social exclusion, and for the Member States to allocate at least 5 % of ESF+ funds to specific projects and structural investments combating child poverty, with at least 10 % earmarked for the Member States with child poverty and social exclusion levels exceeding the EU average; emphasises that this investment in the next generation, in addition to ensuring the well-being of children, is a sound investment that would prevent future societal costs61; stresses that the use of thes…
Excerpt — full text in the official PDF. - Amendment 8Motion for a resolution · Paragraph 47 a (new)Amendment
47a. Recalls Commission President Ursula von der Leyen’s commitment, in 2019, to ensure that every child in Europe at risk of poverty or social exclusion has access to the most basic of rights, such as healthcare and education, which was followed by the adoption, in 2021, of a Council recommendation establishing a European Child Guarantee; stresses that the objectives of the European Child Guarantee cannot be achieved without an ambitious dedicated budget at both EU and national level; reiterates, in this context, its call for a substantial dedicated budget of at least EUR 20 billion for the European Child Guarantee; underlines the urgent need for this dedicated budget to be allocated in the…
Excerpt — full text in the official PDF. - Amendment 9Motion for a resolution · Paragraph 63 a (new)Amendment
63a. Welcomes the planned coordination between the European affordable housing plan and the upcoming EU anti-poverty strategy; welcomes, furthermore, the focus put on the Housing First approach; underlines that fighting homelessness requires resources at both Member State and EU level; calls for a dedicated budget and a new work plan for the European Platform on Combatting Homelessness under the next European Pillar of Social Rights action plan; calls for the EU ensure the eradication of homelessness by 2030 at the latest;
- Amendment 10Motion for a resolution · Recital AG a (new)Amendment
AGa. whereas according to the European Environment Agency report of 2018 entitled ‘Unequal exposure and unequal impacts’, people experiencing poverty are more likely to live in substandard and energy-inefficient housing located in polluted or environmentally degraded areas, resulting in higher exposure to environmental hazards; whereas this disproportionately affects certain population groups facing structural discrimination, including Roma and Traveller populations, as well as low-paid workers such as cleaning workers, thereby reinforcing health and social inequalities;
- Amendment 11Motion for a resolution · Paragraph 46 a (new)Amendment
46a. Calls on the Commission to include in its anti-poverty strategy an environmental justice agenda that could lead to an environmental justice strategy; calls, furthermore, on the Commission to work on environment-related indicators and data, including on exposure to environmental hazards and on safe, adequate and habitable housing conditions, to enrich the anti-poverty strategy, and to include environmental health considerations, notably those linked to unhealthy or polluted housing conditions, in its efforts to combat poverty;
- Amendment 12Motion for a resolution · Recital W a (new)Amendment
Wa. whereas in 2024 around 8 % of Europeans were unable to afford a balanced meal including meat, fish or a vegetarian equivalent every two days, representing around 36 million people across the Union, with the issue particularly acute among single people, students and young adults, low-income families and immigrants; whereas effective access to food should be considered a fundamental human right, as requested by an ongoing European Citizens’ Initiative;
- Amendment 13Motion for a resolution · Paragraph 67Current text
67. Stresses that the anti-poverty strategy will only deliver results if accompanied by adequate funding at EU and national level; insists on the need to safeguard and strengthen cohesion policy in order to continue supporting economic, social and territorial cohesion and combating asymmetries between and within the Member States of the EU under the next MFF; calls, in this regard, for an adequate and ring-fenced allocation of funds to reinforce policies that contribute to eradicating poverty, including targeted support for marginalised and vulnerable groups; highlights the essential role of the ESF+ in promoting social inclusion and combating poverty, notably by providing aid to the most de…
Amendment67. Stresses that the anti-poverty strategy will only deliver results if accompanied by adequate funding at EU and national level; insists on the need to safeguard and strengthen cohesion policy in order to continue supporting economic, social and territorial cohesion and combating asymmetries between and within the Member States of the EU under the next MFF; calls, in this regard, for an adequate and ring-fenced allocation of funds to reinforce policies that contribute to eradicating poverty, including targeted support for marginalised and vulnerable groups; highlights the essential role of the ESF+ in promoting social inclusion and combating poverty, notably by providing aid to the most de…
Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
Official amendment documents
Members who amended this procedure
67 Members · by amendment count
























The amendments, in full text
750 amendmentsEvery amendment as tabled — original text, proposed change and justification, with a link to the official PDF.