Tackling barriers to the single market for defence
This report addresses tackling barriers to the single market for defence. The amendments debate joint defence planning, pooling and procurement, reducing market fragmentation, financing for the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base, application of the sustainable finance framework and taxonomy to defence, funding under the next multiannual financial framework, and the SAFE instrument.
Procedure timeline
- Committee amendments tabled7 Nov 2025 – 14 Nov 2025
- Plenary vote — Adopted11 Mar 2026 · On the motion for a resolution · the text as a whole
Plenary votes
3 roll-call votesIn plenary, Parliament usually votes in steps: first on amendments to the text (sometimes split into parts, so Members can accept one half of a sentence and reject the other), then on the text as a whole. The “main vote” is the one that adopts or rejects the text itself. Each vote below shows exactly which step it was. How voting works →
- 11 Mar 2026RejectedOn amendment 1 · text to be inserted after paragraph 1Official label: Après le § 1 - Am 1 · what was voted ↗182 for423 against21 abstentions92 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 11 Mar 2026RejectedOn amendment 2 · paragraph 18Official label: § 18 - Am 2 · what was voted ↗178 for412 against30 abstentions98 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 11 Mar 2026Main voteAdoptedOn the motion for a resolution · the text as a wholeOfficial label: Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) · what was voted ↗393 for169 against67 abstentions89 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
Vote data: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL, attribution) / European Parliament · roll-call votes only
Plenary amendments2 tabled on this text
Amendments tabled for the plenary sitting on this text, in their own numbering series. This is a different set from the committee amendments tracked elsewhere on AmendEU, and is not counted in any of the site’s amendment totals.
- Amendment 1Motion for a resolution · Paragraph 1 a (new)Amendment
1a. Opposes the concept of a ‘single market for defence’ that fails to take into account the specific characteristics of defence markets, including the particular nature of the armaments sector, Member States’ sovereignty, and their foreign and defence policies; stresses that any European defence cooperation must fully respect these considerations and remain based on voluntary intergovernmental coordination;
- Amendment 2Motion for a resolution · Paragraph 18Current text
18. Calls on the
Commission to issue arecommendationforaninterpretationofArticle 346TFEU in ordertofacilitateaharmonisedanduniformapproachthroughouttheEU,addressingtheneedtoprotectstrictlytheessentialsecurityinterestsofMemberStates,andforArticle346tobeusedexceptionally,inlinewiththecurrent realityofaninterdependentsecurityarchitectureintheEU;considersthattheCommissionshouldbeenabledtoassesstheoverallimplementationofArticle346TFEU,onacase-by-casebasis,toremedyanypotentialstructuralmisuse,inlinewith theCJEU case-lawandwiththecurrentrealityofaninterdependentsecurityarchitectureintheEU;Amendment18. Calls on the Commission, when addressing matters related to Article 346 TFEU, to fully respect the prerogatives of Member States, for the protection of the essential interests of their security which are connected with the production of, or trade in, arms, munitions and war material; stresses that the assessment of such interests lies exclusively with Member States and is not subject to a harmonised interpretation at EU level; recalls, in this context, that export controls in the defence sector remain under Member States’ competence in accordance with the Treaties, and emphasises that any EU action in this area should fully respect Member States’ foreign and security policy decisions;
Official amendment documents
Members who amended this procedure
65 Members · by amendment count
























The amendments, in full text
449 amendmentsEvery amendment as tabled — original text, proposed change and justification, with a link to the official PDF.