Skip to content
Procedure

Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - Commission

2025/2145(DEC)·10th term·AFET / CULT / DEVE / EMPL / ENVI / FEMM / LIBE / REGI / SANT / TRAN·DEC
Summary

The dossier is the 2024 discharge for the general budget of the EU - Commission. Amendments split over the Pact on Migration and Asylum, AMIF and ISF funds, external border management and returns, irregular migration and third countries, the rule of law toolbox and Hungary's judicial independence, access to documents, spyware, Commission funding of NGOs, the European Court of Auditors' findings, and DG EMPL programmes' error rates.

Procedure timeline

  1. Committee amendments tabled
    29 Oct 2025 – 20 Feb 2026
  2. Plenary vote — Adopted
    29 Apr 2026 · On the motion for a resolution · the text as a whole
992
Amendments
distinct, in window
118
Members
tabled at least one
10
Committees
29 Oct 2025 – 12 Dec 2025
Dates

Plenary votes

38 roll-call votes

In plenary, Parliament usually votes in steps: first on amendments to the text (sometimes split into parts, so Members can accept one half of a sentence and reject the other), then on the text as a whole. The “main vote” is the one that adopts or rejects the text itself. Each vote below shows exactly which step it was. How voting works →

  1. Show the 27 earlier votes
    1. 29 Apr 2026Rejected
      On amendment 13 · text to be inserted after paragraph 13
      Official label: Après le § 13 - Am 13 · what was voted ↗
      211 for437 against3 abstentions68 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    2. 29 Apr 2026Rejected
      On amendment 3 · paragraph 14
      Official label: § 14 - Am 3 · what was voted ↗
      179 for464 against13 abstentions63 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    3. 29 Apr 2026Rejected
      On amendment 14 · text to be inserted after paragraph 14
      Official label: Après le § 14 - Am 14 · what was voted ↗
      200 for439 against15 abstentions65 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    4. 29 Apr 2026Rejected
      On amendment 15 · text to be inserted after paragraph 14
      Official label: Après le § 14 - Am 15 · what was voted ↗
      203 for442 against6 abstentions68 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    5. 29 Apr 2026Rejected
      On amendment 7 · text to be inserted after paragraph 15
      Official label: Après le § 15 - Am 7 · what was voted ↗
      217 for433 against7 abstentions62 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    6. 29 Apr 2026Rejected
      On amendment 16 · text to be inserted after paragraph 15
      Official label: Après le § 15 - Am 16 · what was voted ↗
      194 for451 against11 abstentions63 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    7. 29 Apr 2026Rejected
      On amendment 47 · paragraph 20
      Official label: § 20, point vi - Am 47 · what was voted ↗
      199 for448 against8 abstentions64 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    8. 29 Apr 2026Rejected
      On amendment 48 · paragraph 20
      Official label: § 20, point vii - Am 48 · what was voted ↗
      238 for409 against4 abstentions68 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    9. 29 Apr 2026Rejected
      On amendment 49 · paragraph 20 · point x
      Official label: § 20, point x - Am 49 · what was voted ↗
      209 for430 against14 abstentions66 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    10. 29 Apr 2026Adopted
      On paragraph 46 (part 2 of a split vote)
      Official label: § 46/2 · what was voted ↗
      364 for262 against20 abstentions73 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    11. 29 Apr 2026Rejected
      On amendment 25 · text to be inserted after paragraph 47
      Official label: Après le § 47 - Am 25 · what was voted ↗
      142 for494 against16 abstentions67 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    12. 29 Apr 2026Adopted
      On paragraph 56
      Official label: § 56 · what was voted ↗
      367 for265 against17 abstentions70 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    13. 29 Apr 2026Rejected
      On amendment 35 · paragraph 68
      Official label: § 68 - Am 35 · what was voted ↗
      154 for455 against49 abstentions61 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    14. 29 Apr 2026Rejected
      On amendment 17 · text to be inserted after paragraph 81
      Official label: Après le § 81 - Am 17 · what was voted ↗
      190 for443 against19 abstentions67 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    15. 29 Apr 2026Rejected
      On amendment 18 · text to be inserted after paragraph 86
      Official label: Après le § 86 - Am 18 · what was voted ↗
      205 for441 against7 abstentions66 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    16. 29 Apr 2026Rejected
      On amendment 37 · text to be inserted after paragraph 108
      Official label: Après le § 108 - Am 37 · what was voted ↗
      198 for440 against16 abstentions65 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    17. 29 Apr 2026Rejected
      On amendment 50 · paragraph 117
      Official label: § 117 - Am 50 · what was voted ↗
      198 for445 against11 abstentions65 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    18. 29 Apr 2026Rejected
      On amendment 39 · paragraph 120
      Official label: § 120, après le point vii - Am 39 · what was voted ↗
      198 for441 against17 abstentions63 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    19. 29 Apr 2026Adopted
      On amendment 40 · paragraph 160
      Official label: § 160, après le point vii - Am 40 · what was voted ↗
      362 for269 against20 abstentions68 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    20. 29 Apr 2026Rejected
      On amendment 51 · paragraph 171
      Official label: § 171 - Am 51 · what was voted ↗
      268 for373 against11 abstentions67 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    21. 29 Apr 2026Adopted
      On amendment 52 · text to be inserted after paragraph 172
      Official label: Après le § 172 - Am 52 · what was voted ↗
      355 for263 against10 abstentions91 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    22. 29 Apr 2026Rejected
      On amendment 53 · paragraph 173
      Official label: § 173 - Am 53 · what was voted ↗
      237 for405 against7 abstentions70 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    23. 29 Apr 2026Adopted
      On paragraph 177
      Official label: § 177, point vii/2 · what was voted ↗
      446 for193 against15 abstentions65 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    24. 29 Apr 2026Rejected
      On amendment 56 · paragraph 202
      Official label: § 202 - Am 56 · what was voted ↗
      164 for409 against84 abstentions62 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    25. 29 Apr 2026Rejected
      On amendment 20 · text to be inserted after paragraph 226
      Official label: Après le § 226 - Am 20 · what was voted ↗
      199 for402 against40 abstentions78 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    26. 29 Apr 2026Rejected
      On amendment 21 · text to be inserted after paragraph 237
      Official label: Après le § 237 - Am 21 · what was voted ↗
      200 for440 against9 abstentions70 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    27. 29 Apr 2026Rejected
      On amendment 28 · paragraph 247
      Official label: § 247, après le point iv - Am 28 · what was voted ↗
      179 for384 against89 abstentions67 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

  2. 29 Apr 2026Rejected
    On amendment 45S · paragraph 253
    Official label: § 253 - Am 45S · what was voted ↗
    187 for453 against15 abstentions64 did not vote
    For
    Against
    Abst.

    Click a group to see each Member’s position.

  3. 29 Apr 2026Rejected
    On amendment 46 · text to be inserted after paragraph 253
    Official label: Après le § 253 - Am 46 · what was voted ↗
    196 for441 against16 abstentions66 did not vote
    For
    Against
    Abst.

    Click a group to see each Member’s position.

  4. 29 Apr 2026Main voteAdopted
    On the motion for a resolution · the text as a whole
    Official label: Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) · what was voted ↗
    418 for207 against14 abstentions80 did not vote
    For
    Against
    Abst.

    Click a group to see each Member’s position.

Showing the 30 most relevant of 38 recorded votes — the full list ships with the data files. · Vote data: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL, attribution) / European Parliament · roll-call votes only

Plenary amendments57 tabled on this text

Amendments tabled for the plenary sitting on this text, in their own numbering series. This is a different set from the committee amendments tracked elsewhere on AmendEU, and is not counted in any of the site’s amendment totals.

  1. Amendment 1ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 7
    Current text

    7. Stresses that transparency is not an abstract governance principle but a core element of an effective control environment; underlines that incomplete documentation, inconsistent registration practices or reliance on informal communication channels directly weaken audit trails and hinder the discharge authority’s capacity to assess legality, regularity and sound financial management; in that regard regrets that there have been numerous examples over the last years where the Commission failed to live up to reasonable standards of transparency and takes note of case T-36/232 , Stevi and The New York Times v Commission; recalls that under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 text messages sent or rec…

    Amendment

    7. Stresses that transparency is not an abstract governance principle but a core element of an effective control environment; underlines that incomplete documentation, inconsistent registration practices or reliance on informal communication channels directly weaken audit trails and hinder the discharge authority’s capacity to assess legality, regularity and sound financial management; in that regard regrets that there have been numerous examples over the last years where the Commission failed to live up to reasonable standards of transparency for example with the European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency (CINEA) and the LIFE programme and takes note of case T-36/232…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  2. Amendment 2ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 13
    Current text

    13. Recalls that the Commission’s 2024 review of NGO grant agreements found no breaches of the law; nevertheless, underlines that any recipient of Union funding, including NGOs, should be subject to robust, proportionate and risk-based scrutiny and transparency requirements, in line with legal provisions and sound financial management; stresses that budgetary control, safeguards and transparency requirements must be applied in a neutral, proportionate and evidence-based way, ensuring that transparency and oversight apply effectively across all categories of beneficiaries and that the scrutiny is risk-based; emphasises that the lack of transparency undermines trust in the discharge process an…

    Amendment

    13. Recalls that the Commission’s 2024 review of NGO grant agreements found reputational risk for the EU; nevertheless, underlines that any recipient of Union funding, including NGOs, should be subject to robust, proportionate and risk-based scrutiny and transparency requirements, in line with legal provisions and sound financial management; stresses that budgetary control, safeguards and transparency requirements must be applied in a neutral, proportionate and evidence-based way, ensuring that transparency and oversight apply effectively across all categories of beneficiaries and that the scrutiny is risk-based; emphasises that the lack of transparency undermines trust in the discharge proc…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  3. Amendment 3ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 14
    Current text

    14. Notes that, under the Treaties, civil society organisations are legitimate beneficiaries of Union funding and frequently support the attainment of Union objectives; stresses that budgetary control, safeguards and transparency requirements must be applied in a neutral, proportionate and evidence-based way, with due regard for legal certainty; highlights that selective transparency can undermine confidence in the discharge process, and that effective scrutiny requires the consistent application of comparable standards to all beneficiaries; takes note of the Scrutiny Working Group established within Parliament in this regard;

    Amendment

    14. Notes that, under the Treaties, civil society organisations are legitimate beneficiaries of Union funding as long as they respect the “Guidance on funding for activities related to the development, implementation, monitoring and enforcement of Union legislation and policy” (Ares(2024)3320196) and frequently support the attainment of Union objectives; stresses that budgetary control, safeguards and transparency requirements must be applied in a neutral, proportionate and evidence-based way, with due regard for legal certainty; we welcome the Scrutiny Working Group established within Parliament in this regard;

  4. Amendment 4ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 30
    Current text

    30. Stresses the importance of ensuring that public authorities effectively recover amounts unduly lost through fraud, evasion, irregularities and administrative fragmentation, as an essential element of protecting public finances; calls on the Commission to enhance transparency by publishing clear, annual information on recoveries, financial corrections and confiscations linked to Union spending and enforcement cooperation, presented in a coherent and accessible manner that supports accountability while avoiding an unnecessary administrative burden;

    Amendment

    30. Stresses the importance of ensuring that public authorities effectively recover amounts unduly lost through fraud, evasion, irregularities, failure to respect the Guidance on funding for activities related to the development, implementation, monitoring and enforcement of Union legislation and policy and administrative fragmentation, as an essential element of protecting public finances; calls on the Commission to enhance transparency by publishing clear, annual information on recoveries, financial corrections and confiscations linked to Union spending and enforcement cooperation, presented in a coherent and accessible manner that supports accountability while avoiding an unnecessary admi…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  5. Amendment 5ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 157
    Current text

    157. Recognises the importance of the LIFE programme, the Union’s only standalone programme for the environment and climate action, in supporting nature conservation, circular economy initiatives, climate action and the clean energy transition, and more broadly in promoting sustainable development across the Union; recalls that the provisions of the LIFE Regulation, including Article 11(6), provide that operating grants may support the functioning of non-profit making entities active in the development, implementation and enforcement of Union legislation and policy; stresses, however, that such operating grants must be implemented in strict compliance with Union legal, financial and transpar…

    Amendment

    157. Recognises the importance of the LIFE programme, the Union’s only standalone programme for the environment and climate action, in supporting nature conservation, circular economy initiatives, climate action and the clean energy transition, and more broadly in promoting sustainable development across the Union; recalls that the provisions of the LIFE Regulation, including Article 11(6), provide that operating grants may support the functioning of non-profit making entities active in the development, implementation and enforcement of Union legislation and policy; stresses, however, that such operating grants must be implemented in strict compliance with Union legal, financial and transpar…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  6. Amendment 6ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 158
    Current text

    158. Takes note of concerns raised by certain MEPs regarding the use of LIFE operating and action grants by certain beneficiaries, such as civil society organisations and companies; stresses the importance of full transparency with regard to both beneficiaries and the activities financed, continued monitoring and, where necessary, further clarification of the safeguards in place to ensure that Union funds are used exclusively for the objectives defined in the programme;

    Amendment

    158. Takes note of concerns raised by certain MEPs regarding the use of LIFE operating and action grants by certain beneficiaries, such as civil society organisations and companies; stresses the importance of full transparency with regard to both direct and indirect beneficiaries and the activities financed, continued monitoring and, where necessary, further clarification of the safeguards in place to ensure that Union funds are used exclusively for the objectives defined in the programme;

  7. Amendment 7ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 15 a (new)
    Amendment

    15 a. Notes that cooperation with civil society organisations is essential for the development and implementation of Union policies; draws attention, in this context, to the potential risks of undue influence through lobbying activities by certain non-governmental organisations (NGOs) that receive significant funding from the Union budget; highlights in particular the role of the Commission and the decentralized and executive agencies, included European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency (CINEA), which manages major grant programmes such as LIFE; encourages Commission and CINEA to further strengthen ex-ante and ex-post controls, including clear provisions to prevent the…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  8. Amendment 8PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 2 a (new)
    Amendment

    2 a. Notes that the current system of budgetary conditionality linked to the rule of law is not used to protect the financial interests of the Union, but systematically used to harass certain Member States and interfere in the decisions of their democratically elected governments on the basis of an election and a programme; Considers that this climate of tension and bureaucratic interference in democratic life jeopardises cooperation between Member States and jeopardises the reputation of the Commission among the peoples of Europe;

  9. Amendment 9PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 3 a (new)
    Amendment

    3 a. Considers that if the European Court of Auditors issues an adverse opinion on the expenditure of the European Commission budget, Parliament should automatically refuse to grant discharge;

  10. Amendment 10PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 7 a (new)
    Amendment

    7 a. Deplores the scandal of the President of the Commission purchasing 4.6 billion doses of COVID-19 vaccines for EUR 71 billion and ordering an additional 146 million doses in 2024 for an unknown amount, while according to Politico, European countries had already admitted in 2024 that they had discarded 215 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines; - Recalls that the European Commissioner for Health testified before the COVI Special Committee on 27 March 2023 that President Von der Leyen was not involved in any negotiation of a contract for COVID-19 vaccines, contrary to the information published by the New York Times (28 April 2021) and the findings of the European Court of Auditors in its Spec…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  11. Amendment 11PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 9
    Current text

    9. Stresses that Members of the Commission must meet the highest standards of integrity, independence and accountability, both in their current functions and in their previous roles; notes with concern that several senior management positions remained vacant in DG NEAR during the period in which the current Commissioner for Health and Animal Welfare was responsible for this Directorate-General in his capacity as Commissioner for Neighbourhood and Enlargement, and notes that the information provided by the Commission in this regard during the exchange of views with the discharge authority was inaccurate; stresses that the Commission must ensure that all Members of the College meet the standar…

    Amendment

    9. Stresses that Members of the Commission must meet the highest standards of integrity, independence and accountability, both in their current functions and in their previous roles; notes with concern the ongoing judicial investigation in Spain into alleged corruption linked to Forestalia Renovables S.L. and renewable energy authorisations involving senior officials from the Spanish Ministry for the Ecological Transition and the Demographic Challenge during the period in which the current Executive Vice-President for a Clean, Just and Competitive Transition served as Minister responsable for that portfolio; regrets the absence of full and transparent explanations regarding the responsibilit…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  12. Amendment 12PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 11 a (new)
    Amendment

    11 a. Notes that since the COVID episode, the Commission distanced itself too easily from the Treaties to invent EU competences (housing, elections, health, intelligence, weather, etc.), new taxes, colossal debts or other financial scaffolding that jeopardise the financial health of European households and States in the short and long term;

  13. Amendment 13PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 13 a (new)
    Amendment

    13 a. Deplores the lack of effective control by the European Commission over the legal status of the NGOs (whether non-profit or otherwise) it finances, and the absence of a ceiling on executive remuneration to distinguish between ‘commercial’ NGOs and genuine solidarity-based NGOs;

  14. Amendment 14PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 14 a (new)
    Amendment

    14 a. Recalls that grants to NGOs under the EU budget amount to several billion euros per year (estimated at 7.4 billion euros by the European Court of Auditors between 2021 and 2023) of which 3.3 billion euros were received by 30 organisations14a; - Recalls that the scandals of Qatargate or the fraud of humanitarian aid in Syria14b or via Caritas14c in Luxembourg have revealed that some civil society organisations are catalysts for corruption14d; - Deplores the lack of effective control by the European Commission and its executive agencies to trace and publish the final beneficiary of the funds it allocates, in particular in the face of the opaque system of cascading grants between NGOs; -…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  15. Amendment 15PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 14 b (new)
    Amendment

    14 b. Calls on the Commission to require NGOs to publish on the landing page of their websites the salaries of their managers, the total amount of European and national funds received, and a summary of activities carried out; Notes that the CEO of Save the Children International received14f an annual salary of $371,235 in 2024 and that the Times newspaper revealed that 7 OXFAM executives received annual salaries in Kenya in excess of £140,000 (€165,000)14g ; _________________ 14f https://resourcecentre.savethechildren.net/pdf/TRUSTEES-REPORT-STRATEGIC-REVIEW-AND-FINANCIAL-STATEMENTS-2024.pdf 14g https://www.thetimes.com/uk/law/article/oxfam-charity-international-finance-salaries-revealed-hj0…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  16. Amendment 16PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 15 a (new)
    Amendment

    15 a. Calls for each Member State to have the option of objecting to the use of its contributions to the Union budget for the financing of political or activist NGOs on its territory;

  17. Amendment 17PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 81 a (new)
    Amendment

    81 a. Discovers in a report by the US Congress published on 3 February 20266a that in more than 90 meetings organised under the Anti-Disinformation Code between 2022 and 2024, the Commission reportedly pressured platforms to change their global content moderation rules and censor more content; Under pressure from the European Commission, TikTok removed or restricted statements such as “We need to stop the sexualisation of children”, even though they were part of common political debate, in the lead-up to Slovakia’s 2023 national parliamentary elections; Learns that the Commission has reportedly interfered and put pressure on several digital platforms during elections in several Member States…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  18. Amendment 18PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 86 a (new)
    Amendment

    86 a. Expresses its concern at the thousands of annual recourses to consultancy firms, totalling hundreds of millions of euros which cannot be quantified with certainty, for services which are not detailed or which do not fall within the Commission's system of financial transparency; - Recalls the McKinsey case in France during the COVID crisis and the suspicions of related conflicts of interest7a; - Fears the revelation of a new scandal about it; notes, for example, the obscure consultancy mission of EUR 3.2 million7b allocated to PwC for ‘building knowledge and exchanging experience: support to regions to address the division of talent and mitigate the challenges related to the decline of…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  19. Amendment 19PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 157 a (new)
    Amendment

    157 a. Ensure that under no circumstances, incurred of Union funding should use Union funding for detailed lobbying activities directed towards Union institutions, as the EU taxpayer should not be paying for interest related lobbying and as this can create reputational damage and risk upsetting the institutional balance in the Union; welcomed the Commissions new approach and new guidelines published in May 2024 to protect the EU budget; notes it is of course possible to express interests, but that the Union should not be paying for lobbying building capacity or direct lobbying of Union institutions or national and regional parliaments and governments, are not used for regional or national pr…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  20. Amendment 20PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 226 a (new)
    Amendment

    226 a. Considers that any foreign country refusing the return of their criminals and offenders, as requested by a European Member State, should not be able to receive financial assistance from the European Commission;

  21. Amendment 21PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 237 a (new)
    Amendment

    237 a. Deplores the fact that the European Commission is regularly the subject of scandals: - Former Vice-President of the Commission for Foreign Affairs Mogherini resigned in 2025 on charges of corruption and suspicion of favouritism when awarding the tender of the EU Diplomatic Academy for the College of Europe, of which she later became director; - Former Justice Commissioner Didier Reynders is being investigated for money laundering using lottery tickets (potentially EUR 1 million); - The European Commission’s leniency towards its Director-General for Transport, who allegedly accepted free flights and shopping sessions from Qatar Airways in exchange for France’s secret contributions and…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  22. Amendment 22PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 237 b (new)
    Amendment

    237 b. Notes the diversion of part of the post-COVID recovery plan through a €282 million EU-funded grant scheme for hotels, restaurants, and cultural venues highlighted in Poland after a transparency campaign revealed grants for yachts, vodka bars, and a company registered at the same address as a swingers' club237e _________________ 237e https://www.politico.eu/article/poland-freezes-covid-cash-payouts-after-swingers-club-and-yacht-storm/

  23. Amendment 23The LeftMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 2 a (new)
    Amendment

    2 a. Reiterates the paramount importance of protecting the rights of the child in all actions of the Union; expresses grave concern over the findings of the United Nations Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine regarding the deportation and forcible transfer of Ukrainian children to Russia, as documented in its reports; underlines the need for the European Union, within its competences, to act as a constructive and reliable actor within the international legal and institutional framework, contributing to multilateral efforts aimed at identifying affected children, clarifying their whereabouts, supporting family tracing and reunification, and facilitating their safe return…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  24. Amendment 24The LeftMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 16 a (new)
    Amendment

    16 a. Recalls that, pursuant to Article 2 of the EU–Israel Association Agreement, respect for human rights and democratic principles constitutes an essential element of the Agreement; expresses grave concern over repeated and serious violations of international humanitarian and human rights law; Calls on the Commission and the Council to act in accordance with Article 2 and to proceed without delay towards the suspension of the Agreement, ensuring consistency between the Union’s external action and its fundamental values;

  25. Amendment 25The LeftMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 47 a (new)
    Amendment

    47 a. Recalls the temporary “solidarity contribution” introduced by Council Regulation (EU) 2022/1854 during the energy crisis, which applied to profits exceeding by more than 20% the average taxable profits of the previous reference period; notes that this measure generated approximately EUR 28 billion in revenues across the Union in 2022 and 2023; calls on the Commission to propose a renewed and updated framework for such a contribution, based on the average taxable profits generated in the fiscal years 2022 to 2025, applying the same threshold and ensuring that the applicable rate is not lower than the rate applied under Regulation (EU) 2022/1854, in order to address continued risks of ex…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  26. Amendment 26The LeftMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 247 – point iii a (new)
    Amendment

    (iii a) prioritise occupational health and safety, including psychosocial risks (stress, burnout, harassment); it must officially recognize psychosocial risks as occupational hazards and adopt a Parliament-wide prevention plan with measurable objectives; it must implement risk assessments covering telework, business trips, and tight deadlines, as well as confidential reporting channels, training for managers, and regular social dialogue; it insists on the enforcement of the right to disconnect;

  27. Amendment 27The LeftMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 247 – point iv
    Current text

    (iv) commission an external study by independent experts under the auspices of the Chief Confidential Counsellor analysing the functioning or malfunctioning of the formal harassment procedure and proposing means to make it more effective;

    Amendment

    (iv) commission an external study by independent experts under the auspices of the Chief Confidential Counsellor analysing the functioning or malfunctioning of the formal harassment procedure and proposing means to make it more effective, and the expansion of the workforce of occupational health and safety specialists and medical services (including psychologists and occupational physicians) and the allocation of sufficient funds for training and prevention initiatives;

  28. Amendment 28The LeftMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 247 – point iv a (new)
    Amendment

    (iv a) take the necessary measures to ensure that trainees who find themselves in a situation where they have reasonable grounds to believe that there is a serious and imminent danger or an infringement of their moral integrity, their rights, or their dignity, may immediately withdraw from that situation until it has ended or until they have been duly informed that the reasonably presumed danger or violation no longer exists. Exercising this right has no effect on the continuation of the internship, unless the intern decides otherwise. Nor does it affect the intern’s evaluation or compensation;

  29. Amendment 29The LeftMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 247 – point iv b (new)
    Amendment

    (iv b) end to outsourcing within the Commission and for essential services (such as, among others, canteens and cleaning) to be provided directly in-house, in order to better protect workers in precarious situations and ensure decent working conditions;

  30. Amendment 30ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 7 a (new)
    Amendment

    7 a. Calls on the Commission to immediately publish the non-redacted versions of all the Advance Purchase Agreements and Purchase Agreements for the COVID-19 vaccines;

  31. Amendment 31ESNMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 6
    Current text

    6. Notes with concern that the current implementation rate for the cohesion funds is significantly lower than the implementation rate during the previous MFF 2014-2020, which coincides with the fact that only around 50 % of funds under the RRF had been disbursed by the end of 2024, implying that the remaining 50 % of the funds must be disbursed before then end of the RRF implementation period in December 2026; notes with concern that the total amount of outstanding Union bonds rose to EUR 578,2 billion at the end of 2024 and notes with concern the Court’s estimates that this amount could reach EUR 900 billion by the end of 2027, which will place a significant burden on future MFFs due to the…

    Amendment

    6. Notes with concern that the current implementation rate for the cohesion funds is significantly lower than the implementation rate during the previous MFF 2014-2020, which coincides with the fact that only around 50 % of funds under the RRF had been disbursed by the end of 2024, implying that the remaining 50 % of the funds must be disbursed before the end of the RRF implementation period in December 2026; notes with concern that the total amount of outstanding Union bonds rose to EUR 578,2 billion at the end of 2024 and notes with concern the Court's estimates that this amount could reach EUR 900 billion by the end of 2027, which will place a significant burden on future MFFs due to the…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  32. Amendment 32ESNMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 13
    Current text

    13. Recalls that the Commission’s 2024 review of NGO grant agreements found no breaches of the law; nevertheless, underlines that any recipient of Union funding, including NGOs, should be subject to robust, proportionate and risk-based scrutiny and transparency requirements, in line with legal provisions and sound financial management; stresses that budgetary control, safeguards and transparency requirements must be applied in a neutral, proportionate and evidence-based way, ensuring that transparency and oversight apply effectively across all categories of beneficiaries and that the scrutiny is risk-based; emphasises that the lack of transparency undermines trust in the discharge process an…

    Amendment

    13. recalls that the Commission’s 2024 review of NGO grant agreements found no breaches of the law; stresses, however, that legality alone does not ensure sound financial management or safeguard institutional neutrality; underlines that any recipient of Union funding, including NGOs, should be subject to robust, proportionate and risk-based scrutiny and transparency requirements; considers that the use of Union funds to finance advocacy, lobbying or communication activities aimed at influencing Union institutions, legislative processes or electoral debate may constitute a circular use of public money incompatible with the principle of sound financial management, whereby Union funds are used…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  33. Amendment 33ESNMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 13 a (new)
    Amendment

    13 a. Highlights concerns about the emergence of a “lobby loop”, whereby Union funds are granted to organisations that subsequently engage in advocacy, communication or lobbying activities directed at Union institutions and legislative processes; notes in this context reported cases of close alignment between Commission policy priorities and NGO advocacy campaigns, including under the responsibility of former Commission Vice-President Frans Timmermans1a; stresses that such practices, even where formally compliant, risk undermining public trust in the neutrality and integrity of Union spending and decision-making; _________________ 1a See e.g. European Court of Auditors criticism of NGO fundi…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  34. Amendment 34ESNMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 13 b (new)
    Amendment

    13 b. Notes the significant political impact of reporting by the NGO Correctiv in early 2024 on an alleged “secret plan” discussed at a meeting in Potsdam, which triggered widespread public mobilisation and influenced the political debate ahead of elections; notes that central factual claims of this reporting – including the existence of a “masterplan” to deport German citizens – were subsequently challenged before national courts and, in a judgment of March 2026, found to be unlawful, not sufficiently substantiated and in parts untrue, leading to judicial prohibitions, while related proceedings remain ongoing2a; stresses that this case illustrates how politically consequential narratives, e…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  35. Amendment 35ESNMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 68
    Current text

    68. Notes that the ex-post evaluation of Horizon 2020 estimated that for each euro of costs linked to the programme, five euros worth of benefits would be generated for society by 2040; deeply regrets that 74 % of proposals assessed as high quality by independent experts could not be funded due to budget constraints; notes that an additional EUR 159 billion would have been needed to fund all high-quality proposals; stresses the importance of ensuring sufficient funding for Union R&I to boost the Union’s sustainable prosperity and competitiveness; highlights the importance of making full use of the Seal of Excellence and other complementary Union and national funding instruments, including th…

    Amendment

    68. Notes that the ex-post evaluation of Horizon 2020 estimated that for each euro of costs linked to the programme, five euros worth of benefits would be generated for society by 2040; deeply regrets that 74 % of proposals assessed as high quality by independent experts could not be funded due to budget constraints; notes that an additional EUR 159 billion would have been needed to fund all high-quality proposals; stresses the importance of ensuring sufficient funding for Union R&I to boost the Union's sustainable prosperity and competitiveness; insists that Union research funding must be subject to strict relevance criteria directly linked to European industrial competitiveness and strateg…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  36. Amendment 36ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 9
    Current text

    9. Stresses that Members of the Commission must meet the highest standards of integrity, independence and accountability, both in their current functions and in their previous roles; notes with concern that several senior management positions remained vacant in DG NEAR during the period in which the current Commissioner for Health and Animal Welfare was responsible for this Directorate-General in his capacity as Commissioner for Neighbourhood and Enlargement, and notes that the information provided by the Commission in this regard during the exchange of views with the discharge authority was inaccurate; stresses that the Commission must ensure that all Members of the College meet the standar…

    Amendment

    9. Stresses that Members of the Commission must meet the highest standards of integrity, independence and accountability, both in their current functions and in their previous roles; expresses concern that a former Commissioner for Justice has been charged with money laundering during his term of office in the Commission, and that further alarming reports regarding his links to Russia are currently under investigation by the Belgian authorities; calls on the Commission to cooperate closely with the Belgian authorities and to assess whether those issues may have been connected with the performance of the Commissioner’s duties; notes with concern that several senior management positions remain…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  37. Amendment 37ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 108 a (new)
    Amendment

    108 a. Stresses that the SAFE instrument must never be treated as a tool of political struggle, used instrumentally against selected Member States; emphasises that the importance of security issues requires that all actions relating to defence financing remain free from biased assessments and attempts at interference that could weaken the capabilities of Member States in this area, particularly those on the eastern flank, which are most exposed to external threats;

  38. Amendment 38ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 120 – point vii
    Current text

    (vii) closely align the rule of law report with the Conditionality Regulation and report in more detail on the breaches of the principles of the rule of law that can be used as input to trigger the Conditionality Regulation;

    Amendment

    deleted

  39. Amendment 39ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 120 – point vii a (new)
    Amendment

    (vii a) not to use the Conditionality Regulation as a tool of undue interference and pressure on Member States, nor to invoke the rule of law in a biased and political manner, which in fact leads to the erosion of that principle;

  40. Amendment 40ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 160 – point vii a (new)
    Amendment

    (vii a) introduce all possible measures aimed at reducing the adverse impacts of the EU-Mercosur agreement on European agriculture and the market position of European producers, and to reliably monitor the scale as well as the actual effects of these impacts;

  41. Amendment 41ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 160 – point xvi
    Current text

    (xvi) ensure that climate and environmental considerations are taken into account in the next MFF;

    Amendment

    (xvi) ensure that climate and environmental considerations are rationalised and reduced in the next MFF, while enhancing innovation, the development of modern technologies, and the competitive position of European producers;

  42. Amendment 42ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 170
    Current text

    170. Welcomes the adoption of the Pact on Migration and Asylum in 2024 and recalls that its implementation is a corner stone for the new system of migration and asylum management in the EU, which will be in application mid-2026 in all Member States; welcomes, further, the allocation of an additional EUR 2 billion to MFF heading 4 for 2024-2027 in the context of the mid-term revision of the MFF 2021-2027, also with a view to enabling the full implementation of the new rules of the Pact and addressing the growing challenges in migration and border management resulting from the current geopolitical context; stresses the importance of ensuring sufficient funding for its effective implementation,…

    Amendment

    170. Notes the adoption of the Pact on Migration and Asylum in 2024 and the allocation of an additional EUR 2 billion to MFF heading 4 for 2024-2027 in the context of the mid-term revision of the MFF 2021-2027, also with a view to enabling the full implementation of the new rules of the Pact and addressing the growing challenges in migration and border management resulting from the current geopolitical context; stresses the importance of ensuring sufficient funding for its effective implementation, including new border procedures, and thus appreciates the Commission’s written replies that confirm that it has made available additional EUR 3 billion under the AMIF and BMVI for the years 2025–2…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  43. Amendment 43ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 177 – point iii
    Current text

    (iii) continue to monitor and scrutinise the steps required by Member States and Union agencies for the full and timely implementation of the Pact on Migration and Asylum by 2026, and report to the Parliament on progress towards its implementation and grant the Parliament access to all relevant documents to facilitate effective democratic oversight of the implementation process;

    Amendment

    (iii) report to the Parliament on progress towards implementation of the Pact on Migration and Asylum and grant the Parliament access to all relevant documents to facilitate effective democratic oversight of the implementation process;

  44. Amendment 44ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 212 a (new)
    Amendment

    212 a. Expresses concern at the absence of a review of certain controversial cooperation agreements which, despite the lack of positive results and any tangible progress in their implementation, continue to be maintained, including the Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement (PDCA) with Cuba; further expresses concern that the Commission allocates funds in a non-transparent manner and is either unable or unwilling to disclose the full extent of financial support provided to Cuba; reiterates its call for increased transparency and for a comprehensive review of such controversial agreements;

  45. Amendment 45ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 253
    Current text

    253. Recalls that the RRF super milestones for Poland mandated specific reforms in the field of justice including firstly, the dismantling of the Disciplinary Chamber of the Supreme Court and its replacement by an independent Chamber of the Supreme Court, and secondly, that all judges affected by the rulings of the Disciplinary Chamber had the right to have their case reviewed by the new Chamber within a clear timeframe; is concerned by the continued refusal of the Polish president to sign into law the reforms proposed in 2025 by the Polish Government and adopted by the Polish Parliament concerning the rule of law which aim to implement the recommendations of the European Commission regardin…

    Amendment

    deleted

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  46. Amendment 46ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 253 a (new)
    Amendment

    253 a. Stresses that the recognition of Poland’s progress toward fulfilment of the rule-of-law super milestones and the consequent disbursement of funds from the Recovery and Resilience Plan - despite the lack of any substantial changes in the judiciary - demonstrates the political nature of the allegations made against Poland and the instrumental use of this mechanism by the Commission, which, by blocking the transfer of funds rightfully due to Poland, has led to a situation in which their full and rational expenditure before the deadline may become impossible.

  47. Amendment 47ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 20 – point vi
    Current text

    (vi) ensure that all Commissioners and senior officials exercise their functions in full compliance with Union rules on integrity, conflicts of interest and sound administration;

    Amendment

    (vi) ensure that all Commissioners and senior officials exercise their functions in full compliance with Union rules on integrity, conflicts of interest and sound administration and to recall that the former Commissioner that attacked the leading free speech platform X and its owner Elon Musk is a former chief executive officer of a French technology firm and France's leading telecom operator;

  48. Amendment 48ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 20 – point vii
    Current text

    (vii) adequately apply the control framework for the Union expenditure related to climate and biodiversity objectives, including a proportionate verification mechanism, timely reporting of project-level climate data and transparent communication on environmentally impacts, in line with the Court’s recommendations and with due regard for operational feasibility and economic competitiveness; improve the monitoring and reporting of results, beyond mere spending targets, with a view to maximising the impact of Union climate and biodiversity funding;

    Amendment

    (vii) forcefully deregulate in order to restore Europe's competitiveness and calls on the Commission to double down on efforts to reduce red tape, simplify and abolish unnecessary legislation and deliver on all outlined goals relating to simplification and deregulation resulting in a substantial reduction of the scope of the aquis and a corresponding revitalisation of European industry;

  49. Amendment 49ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 20 – point x
    Current text

    (x) continue the efforts made in gender budgeting and in tracking the impact of the Union budget in fostering gender equality;

    Amendment

    (x) focus on policies that reduce the cost of living including fuel and energy prices instead of wasting time and resources on gender budgeting and tracking the impact of the Union budget in fostering gender equality;

  50. Amendment 50ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 117
    Current text

    117. Notes that the Commission allocated EUR 8 million in 2024 and EUR 20,9 million in 2025 for calls for proposals for the production of content on Union affairs by consortia of news media organisations, and that three media consortia currently receive Union funding; recalls that a free, independent and pluralistic press is a cornerstone of democratic accountability; considers that Union support for media can contribute to strengthening media pluralism and informed public debate across the Union, provided that strict safeguards are in place to ensure full editorial independence and transparency; underlines the importance of transparency regarding all financial support, including grants, con…

    Amendment

    117. Notes with concern that the Commission allocated EUR 8 million in 2024 and EUR 20,9 million in 2025, representing an increase of 160 %, for calls for proposals for the production of content on Union affairs by consortia of news media organisations, and that three media consortia currently receive Union funding; recalls that a free, independent and pluralistic press is a cornerstone of democratic accountability; stresses, however, that such funding risks creating structural financial dependency between media organisations that should serve as independent watchdogs and the institutions they cover; underlines that public trust in both media and EU institutions is undermined when journalist…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  51. Amendment 51ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 171
    Current text

    171. Stresses that managing the Union’s external borders is a pillar of the Pact on Migration and Asylum and an essential precondition for a functioning Schengen area of free movement; recognises that EU-funded projects that support the protection of the external border serve to ease the pressure on internal border protection, as stated by the Commissioner for Budget, Anti-Fraud and Public Administration in his hearing in the Committee on Budgetary Control on 8 December 2025; acknowledges that while the overall number of migrants arriving irregularly in the Union decreased by 38 percent in 2024, patterns shifted across the continent with certain routes seeing significant increases, notably t…

    Amendment

    171. Stresses that managing the Union’s external borders is a pillar of the Pact on Migration and Asylum and an essential precondition for a functioning Schengen area of free movement; recognises that EU-funded projects that support the protection of the external border serve to ease the pressure on internal border protection, as stated by the Commissioner for Budget, Anti-Fraud and Public Administration in his hearing in the Committee on Budgetary Control on 8 December 2025; acknowledges that while the overall number of migrants arriving irregularly in the Union decreased by 38 percent in 2024, patterns shifted across the continent with certain routes seeing significant increases, notably t…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  52. Amendment 52ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 172 a (new)
    Amendment

    172a. Honours the memory of Mateusz Sitek, a Polish border guard who was killed on 6 June 2024 while defending the Union's external border against a hybrid attack orchestrated by the Belarusian regime; stresses that the protection of the external borders of the Union is not an abstract policy objective but a matter of life and death for the men and women serving on the frontline; calls on the Commission to ensure that adequate financial and operational support is provided to frontline Member States facing hybrid threats at the Union's external borders;

  53. Amendment 53ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 173
    Current text

    173. Acknowledges the Commission’s ongoing efforts to strengthen meaningful cooperation with third countries of origin and transit, in particular those neighbouring the Union in view of addressing irregular migration at the source; underlines the need for adequate oversight and due diligence when allocating funds to partners involved in migration management outside the EU, in order to ensure that migration is managed in a mutually beneficial manner and in alignment with European Asylum and Migration Strategy, including on fundamental rights; urges the Commission to reinforce the transparency and accountability of Union home affairs funds in third countries;

    Amendment

    173. Acknowledges the Commission’s ongoing efforts to strengthen meaningful cooperation with third countries of origin and transit, in particular those neighbouring the Union in view of addressing illegal migration at the source; underlines the need for adequate oversight and due diligence when allocating funds to partners involved in migration management outside the EU, in order to ensure that migration is managed in a mutually beneficial manner and in alignment with European Asylum and Migration Strategy, including on fundamental rights; urges the Commission to reinforce the transparency and accountability of Union home affairs funds in third countries;

  54. Amendment 54ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 200
    Current text

    200. Recalls that education is a central pillar of peacebuilding, coexistence and preparation for a negotiated two-state solution, and a key mean of countering extremism, intolerance and radical ideologies; recalls that Union financial assistance and political engagement should support education that promotes peace, tolerance and coexistence; welcomes the Commission’s continued engagement with the Palestinian Authority on curriculum reform and acknowledges the tangible progress reported in 2025, including the ongoing review and amendment of textbooks by the Palestinian Ministry of Education and Higher Education to ensure alignment with UNESCO standards; notes in particular that some revision…

    Amendment

    200. Recalls that education is a central pillar of peacebuilding, coexistence and preparation for a negotiated two-state solution, and a key mean of countering extremism, intolerance and radical ideologies; recalls that Union financial assistance and political engagement should support education that promotes peace, tolerance and coexistence; welcomes the Commission’s continued engagement with the Palestinian Authority on curriculum reform; recalls the necessity for the Palestinian Authority to remove all educational materials and content that fail to adhere to UNESCO standards, in particular those containing antisemitism, incitement to violence, glorification of jihad and martyrdom, and the…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  55. Amendment 55ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 201
    Current text

    201. Notes that, as in previous years, no Union funding in 2024 has been used to support the production of Palestinian textbooks, and that Union direct financial assistance provided to the Palestinian Authority via the Union mechanism PEGASE under both the 2024 Emergency Support package and the Multiannual Comprehensive Programme for Palestinian Recovery and Resilience (2025-2027) is strictly limited to traceable expenditure items such as salaries, social allowances and arrears to hospitals; notes that this financial support to the Palestinian Authority is partially linked to the achievement of reforms agreed in an ambitious Reform Matrix with the Palestinian Authority in 2024, which include…

    Amendment

    201. Considers that no Union funding should be used to support the production of Palestinian textbooks directly or indirectly, and that Union direct financial assistance provided to the Palestinian Authority via the Union mechanism PEGASE under both the 2024 Emergency Support package and the Multiannual Comprehensive Programme for Palestinian Recovery and Resilience (2025-2027) should be strictly limited to traceable expenditure items such as salaries, social allowances and arrears to hospitals; notes that this financial support to the Palestinian Authority is partially linked to the achievement of reforms agreed in an ambitious Reform Matrix with the Palestinian Authority in 2024, which inc…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  56. Amendment 56ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 202
    Current text

    202. Urges the Commission, in the context of delivering support and humanitarian aid to the Palestinian population to cooperate with reliable partners on the ground to guarantee the uninterrupted and secure delivery of humanitarian assistance and to ensure that no Union funds are allocated to individuals or organisations linked to terrorist or extremist movements opposed to the Union’s fundamental values; recalls that there have been allegations that 19 of 13 000 UNRWA employees in Gaza were involved in the despicable terrorist attacks by Hamas against Israel on 7 October 2023; acknowledges the United Nations' response to those allegations including the investigations launched by the UN Offi…

    Amendment

    202. Urges the Commission, in the context of delivering support and humanitarian aid to the Palestinian population to cooperate with reliable partners on the ground to guarantee the uninterrupted and secure delivery of humanitarian assistance and to ensure that no Union funds are allocated to individuals or organisations linked to terrorist or extremist movements opposed to the Union’s fundamental values; recalls that there have been allegations that 19 of 13 000 UNRWA employees in Gaza were involved in the despicable terrorist attacks by Hamas against Israel on 7 October 2023; acknowledges the United Nations' response to those allegations including the investigations launched by the UN Offi…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  57. Amendment 57ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 216 a (new)
    Amendment

    216 a. Calls on the Commission to: (a) provide Parliament with clear, public and verifiable evidence from the Palestinian Authority demonstrating the removal of all antisemitic, hateful and violent content from textbooks and teacher guides in active classroom use; (b) scrutinise Union funding made available to the Palestinian Authority and suspend all funding that contributes directly or indirectly to the drafting, teaching or disseminating educational materials that promote antisemitism, hatred and violence;

Full record

Members who amended this procedure

118 Members · by amendment count
1
Marie-Luce BRASIER-CLAIN
Marie-Luce BRASIER-CLAIN
Patriots for Europe · 🇫🇷 France
47
2
Michele PICARO
Michele PICARO
European Conservatives & Reformists · 🇮🇹 Italy
42(32 solo)
3
Margarita DE LA PISA CARRIÓN
Margarita DE LA PISA CARRIÓN
Patriots for Europe · 🇪🇸 Spain
36(8 solo)
4
Mathilde ANDROUËT
Mathilde ANDROUËT
Patriots for Europe · 🇫🇷 France
29(5 solo)
5
Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ
Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ
Greens / EFA · 🇷🇴 Romania
28(28 solo)
6
Michalis HADJIPANTELA
Michalis HADJIPANTELA
European People's Party (EPP) · 🇨🇾 Cyprus
26(18 solo)
7
Billy KELLEHER
Billy KELLEHER
Renew Europe · 🇮🇪 Ireland
24
8
Anne-Sophie FRIGOUT
Anne-Sophie FRIGOUT
Patriots for Europe · 🇫🇷 France
24
9
Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE
Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE
Renew Europe · 🇳🇱 Netherlands
21
10
Valentina PALMISANO
Valentina PALMISANO
The Left (GUE/NGL) · 🇮🇹 Italy
21(21 solo)
11
Veronika CIFROVÁ OSTRIHOŇOVÁ
Veronika CIFROVÁ OSTRIHOŇOVÁ
Renew Europe · 🇸🇰 Slovakia
19
12
Cristian TERHEŞ
Cristian TERHEŞ
European Conservatives & Reformists · 🇷🇴 Romania
18(18 solo)
13
Aleksandar NIKOLIC
Aleksandar NIKOLIC
Patriots for Europe · 🇫🇷 France
18
14
Elena NEVADO DEL CAMPO
Elena NEVADO DEL CAMPO
European People's Party (EPP) · 🇪🇸 Spain
18
15
Dolors MONTSERRAT
Dolors MONTSERRAT
European People's Party (EPP) · 🇪🇸 Spain
18
16
Erik KALIŇÁK
Erik KALIŇÁK
Non-attached · 🇸🇰 Slovakia
17(7 solo)
17
Christophe CLERGEAU
Christophe CLERGEAU
Socialists & Democrats · 🇫🇷 France
16(2 solo)
18
Matthieu VALET
Matthieu VALET
Patriots for Europe · 🇫🇷 France
16
19
Valérie DELOGE
Valérie DELOGE
Patriots for Europe · 🇫🇷 France
16
20
Roman HAIDER
Roman HAIDER
Patriots for Europe · 🇦🇹 Austria
16
21
Michael GAHLER
Michael GAHLER
European People's Party (EPP) · 🇩🇪 Germany
15(15 solo)
22
Ondřej KNOTEK
Ondřej KNOTEK
Patriots for Europe · 🇨🇿 Czechia
14
23
Marta TEMIDO
Marta TEMIDO
Socialists & Democrats · 🇵🇹 Portugal
14
24
Olivier CHASTEL
Olivier CHASTEL
Renew Europe · 🇧🇪 Belgium
14
25
Vlad VASILE-VOICULESCU
Vlad VASILE-VOICULESCU
Renew Europe · 🇷🇴 Romania
14

The amendments, in full text

1,073 amendments

Every amendment as tabled — original text, proposed change and justification, with a link to the official PDF.

The full amendment texts load as you scroll here.
Report a data issue