Skip to content
Procedure

Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - Court of Justice of the European Union

2025/2148(DEC)·10th term·CONT / JURI·DEC
Summary

Report on the 2024 discharge for the Court of Justice of the European Union. Amendments address the CJEU's budgetary implementation, expenditure on Members and staff, buildings and IT, the rise in cases and length of proceedings, the partial transfer of preliminary-ruling jurisdiction to the General Court, e-Curia, an AI-assistant pilot project, cybersecurity, the Istanbul Convention and gender composition of the Courts.

Procedure timeline

  1. Committee amendments tabled
    21 Jan 2026 – 28 Jan 2026
  2. Plenary vote — Adopted
    29 Apr 2026 · On the motion for a resolution · the text as a whole
60
Amendments
distinct, in window
20
Members
tabled at least one
2
Committees
21 Jan 2026 – 28 Jan 2026
Dates

Plenary votes

5 roll-call votes

In plenary, Parliament usually votes in steps: first on amendments to the text (sometimes split into parts, so Members can accept one half of a sentence and reject the other), then on the text as a whole. The “main vote” is the one that adopts or rejects the text itself. Each vote below shows exactly which step it was. How voting works →

  1. Show the 2 earlier votes
    1. 29 Apr 2026Rejected
      On amendment 2 · paragraph 5
      Official label: § 5 - Am 2 · what was voted ↗
      205 for443 against4 abstentions67 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

    2. 29 Apr 2026Rejected
      On amendment 3 · paragraph 41
      Official label: § 41 - Am 3 · what was voted ↗
      193 for450 against6 abstentions70 did not vote
      For
      Against
      Abst.

      Click a group to see each Member’s position.

  2. 29 Apr 2026Rejected
    On amendment 1 · recital C
    Official label: Considérant C - Am 1 · what was voted ↗
    210 for432 against11 abstentions66 did not vote
    For
    Against
    Abst.

    Click a group to see each Member’s position.

  3. 29 Apr 2026Rejected
    On amendment 4 · recital C
    Official label: Considérant C - Am 4 · what was voted ↗
    210 for432 against3 abstentions74 did not vote
    For
    Against
    Abst.

    Click a group to see each Member’s position.

  4. 29 Apr 2026Main voteAdopted
    On the motion for a resolution · the text as a whole
    Official label: Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) · what was voted ↗
    526 for79 against47 abstentions67 did not vote
    For
    Against
    Abst.

    Click a group to see each Member’s position.

Vote data: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL, attribution) / European Parliament · roll-call votes only

Plenary amendments6 tabled on this text

Amendments tabled for the plenary sitting on this text, in their own numbering series. This is a different set from the committee amendments tracked elsewhere on AmendEU, and is not counted in any of the site’s amendment totals.

  1. Amendment 1ESNMotion for a resolution · Recital C
    Current text

    C. whereas the CJEU helps preserving the values of the Union and, through its case-law, works towards the building of Europe while remaining accountable to citizens through legal certainty, consistency of jurisprudence and respect for the limits of judicial interpretation;

    Amendment

    C. Whereas the CJEU helps preserving the values of the Union while strictly adhering to the powers conferred upon it by the Treaties, and whereas, through its case law, it must ensure legal certainty and the predictability of the law without expanding the Union’s powers through judicial interpretation, while remaining accountable to citizens through the consistency of jurisprudence and respect for the limits of judicial interpretation;

  2. Amendment 2ESNMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 5
    Current text

    5. Notes that personnel expenditure accounts for almost 80 % of the CJEU budget and that salary updates exceeded initial forecasts in 2024; stresses that, while these increases were absorbed without additional budgetary reinforcements, their recurrent nature raises questions as regards medium-term budgetary sustainability under current MFF constraints; calls for enhanced multiannual workforce and expenditure planning, without undermining judicial independence;

    Amendment

    5. Notes that personnel expenditure accounts for almost 80 % of the CJEU budget and that salary updates exceeded initial forecasts in 2024; stresses that, while these increases were absorbed without additional budgetary reinforcements, their recurrent nature raises questions as regards medium-term budgetary sustainability under current MFF constraints; calls for enhanced multiannual workforce and expenditure planning, calls, in this regard, for the establishment of specific targets for workforce management and the optimisation of support functions, in order to curb the rise in spending, without undermining judicial independence;

  3. Amendment 3ESNMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 41
    Current text

    41. Welcomes the CJEU’s engagement to enhance transparency, access to justice and public openness, thus contributing to foster public trust in the Union institutions, while balancing in other fundamental concerns such as judicial serenity, confidentiality of proceedings and protection of personal data; emphasises that increased transparency must also serve to strengthen public trust in the CJEU’s jurisprudence; encourages the CJEU to continue efforts to improve the clarity, accessibility and predictability of its case-law, particularly in cases with significant constitutional or societal impact; notes that, in 2024, the CJEU consolidated the streaming service for hearings of the Court of Jus…

    Amendment

    41. Welcomes the CJEU’s engagement to enhance transparency, access to justice and public openness, thus contributing to foster public trust in the Union institutions, while balancing in other fundamental concerns such as judicial serenity, confidentiality of proceedings and protection of personal data; emphasises, in this regard, the need for clear, understandable, and strictly legal reasoning in court rulings, particularly in cases with significant constitutional or societal implications, in order to avoid any politicised decisions; notes that, in 2024, the CJEU consolidated the streaming service for hearings of the Court of Justice and of the General Court on the Curia website, thus facili…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  4. Amendment 4ECRMotion for a resolution · Recital C
    Current text

    C. whereas the CJEU helps preserving the values of the Union and, through its case-law, works towards the building of Europe while remaining accountable to citizens through legal certainty, consistency of jurisprudence and respect for the limits of judicial interpretation;

    Amendment

    C. whereas the CJEU helps preserving the values of the Union and, through its case-law, works towards the building of Europe while remaining accountable to citizens through legal certainty, consistency of jurisprudence and respect for the limits of judicial interpretation, national constitutions and legal traditions;

  5. Amendment 5ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 60 a (new)
    Amendment

    60 a. Highlights that national constitutions are the primary expression of the direct democratic will of the peoples of the Member States and that democratic legitimacy within the Union ultimately derives from those constitutional frameworks; underlines that any transfer or exercise of competences at Union level must remain subject to the limits and conditions set by those constitutions; affirms that the sovereignty of Member States is rooted in their constitutional orders and cannot be diminished by the interpretation or application of Union law, and insists that, in the event of conflict, national constitutional provisions shall prevail as the ultimate source of legal authority within Memb…

    Excerpt — full text in the official PDF.
  6. Amendment 6PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 55 a (new)
    Amendment

    55 a. Stresses that environmental initiatives within Union institutions must remain cost-effective and technology-neutral; calls on the Court to provide a transparent cost–benefit analysis of its green investments and procurement practices and to ensure that environmental considerations do not override efficiency or budgetary discipline;

Official amendment documents

Full record

The amendments, in full text

60 amendments

Every amendment as tabled — original text, proposed change and justification, with a link to the official PDF.

The full amendment texts load as you scroll here.
Report a data issue