Recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union on Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on promoting transnational governance on water in the interests of conflict prevention and peace
This own-initiative report recommends promoting transnational governance of water for conflict prevention and peace. Amendments affirm state sovereignty over natural resources while noting that water scarcity affects nearly half the global population and acts as a risk multiplier and driver of conflict. They cite the weaponisation of water, including the destruction of the Kakhovka Dam in Ukraine by Russia, and the transboundary impacts of Turkey's Southeastern Anatolia Project and Ilisu Dam on the Tigris and Euphrates in Iraq and Syria, and the destruction of water infrastructure in Gaza under the EU-Israel Association Agreement. They call for EU funding under the next multiannual financial framework, EEAS engagement, support for the UN Special Envoy on Water, and integrated water resources management under SDG target 6.5.
Procedure timeline
- Committee amendments tabled2 Mar 2026 – 5 Mar 2026 · including EP official documents, Feb–Jul 2026
- Plenary vote — Adopted17 Jun 2026 · On the motion for a resolution — the text as a whole
Plenary votes
7 roll-call votesIn plenary, Parliament usually votes in steps: first on amendments to the text (sometimes split into parts, so Members can accept one half of a sentence and reject the other), then on the text as a whole. The “main vote” is the one that adopts or rejects the text itself. Each vote below shows exactly which step it was. How voting works →
Show the 4 earlier votes
- 17 Jun 2026RejectedOn amendment 4 — paragraph 1 — point kOfficial label: § 1, après le point k - Am 4 · what was voted ↗220 for389 against27 abstentions83 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 17 Jun 2026RejectedOn amendment 7 — paragraph 1 — point uOfficial label: § 1, point u - Am 7 · what was voted ↗284 for333 against32 abstentions70 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 17 Jun 2026RejectedOn amendment 1 — text to be inserted after recital JOfficial label: Après le considérant J - Am 1 · what was voted ↗123 for448 against64 abstentions84 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 17 Jun 2026RejectedOn amendment 5 — recital ROfficial label: Considérant R - Am 5 · what was voted ↗279 for328 against30 abstentions82 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 17 Jun 2026RejectedOn amendment 2 — recital SOfficial label: Considérant S - Am 2 · what was voted ↗152 for445 against50 abstentions72 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 17 Jun 2026RejectedOn amendment 3 — recital TOfficial label: Considérant T - Am 3 · what was voted ↗197 for403 against28 abstentions91 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 17 Jun 2026Main voteAdoptedOn the motion for a resolution — the text as a wholeOfficial label: Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) · what was voted ↗431 for111 against103 abstentions74 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
Vote data: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL, attribution) / European Parliament · roll-call votes only
Official amendment documents
Members who amended this procedure
35 Members · by amendment countThe amendments, in full text
299 amendmentsEvery amendment as tabled — original text, proposed change and justification, with a link to the official PDF.