Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2027 – Section I – European Parliament
The European Parliament's estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2027 (Section I). The amendments address staffing, IT and cybersecurity spending, investment in artificial intelligence, the SPAAK building renovation and its financing, Europa Experience spaces and liaison offices, mission and travel costs and carbon footprint, communication and outreach against disinformation, and multilingualism; several call for savings, greater budget transparency, or reject specific expenditure items and programmes involving third countries.
Procedure timeline
- Committee amendments tabled23 Mar 2026
- Plenary vote — Adopted30 Apr 2026 · On the motion for a resolution · the text as a whole
Plenary votes
13 roll-call votesIn plenary, Parliament usually votes in steps: first on amendments to the text (sometimes split into parts, so Members can accept one half of a sentence and reject the other), then on the text as a whole. The “main vote” is the one that adopts or rejects the text itself. Each vote below shows exactly which step it was. How voting works →
Show the 10 earlier votes
- 30 Apr 2026RejectedOn amendment 3 · text to be inserted after paragraph 3Official label: Après le § 3 - Am 3 · what was voted ↗162 for407 against18 abstentions132 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 30 Apr 2026RejectedOn amendment 4 · text to be inserted after paragraph 3Official label: Après le § 3 - Am 4 · what was voted ↗73 for443 against63 abstentions140 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 30 Apr 2026RejectedOn amendment 9 · text to be inserted after paragraph 8Official label: Après le § 8 - Am 9 · what was voted ↗185 for378 against17 abstentions139 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 30 Apr 2026RejectedOn amendment 10 · paragraph 16Official label: § 16 - Am 10 · what was voted ↗168 for378 against33 abstentions140 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 30 Apr 2026RejectedOn amendment 13 · paragraph 25Official label: § 25 - Am 13 · what was voted ↗148 for388 against37 abstentions146 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 30 Apr 2026AdoptedOn amendment 15 (part 1 of a split vote) · text to be inserted after paragraph 27Official label: Après le § 27 - Am 15/1 · what was voted ↗410 for146 against28 abstentions135 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 30 Apr 2026AdoptedOn amendment 15 (part 2 of a split vote) · text to be inserted after paragraph 27Official label: Après le § 27 - Am 15/2 · what was voted ↗308 for256 against13 abstentions142 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 30 Apr 2026AdoptedOn amendment 1 (part 1 of a split vote) · paragraph 28Official label: § 28 - Am 1/1 · what was voted ↗267 for197 against116 abstentions139 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 30 Apr 2026RejectedOn amendment 1 (part 2 of a split vote) · paragraph 28Official label: § 28 - Am 1/2 · what was voted ↗141 for361 against69 abstentions148 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 30 Apr 2026RejectedOn amendment 2 · text to be inserted after paragraph 28Official label: Après le § 28 - Am 2 · what was voted ↗218 for262 against108 abstentions131 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 30 Apr 2026RejectedOn amendment 7 · text to be inserted after paragraph 32Official label: Après le § 32 - Am 7 · what was voted ↗100 for430 against49 abstentions140 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 30 Apr 2026AdoptedOn amendment 14 · text to be inserted after paragraph 10Official label: Après le § 10 - Am 14/rev · what was voted ↗402 for135 against46 abstentions136 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 30 Apr 2026Main voteAdoptedOn the motion for a resolution · the text as a wholeOfficial label: Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) · what was voted ↗401 for116 against68 abstentions134 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
Vote data: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL, attribution) / European Parliament · roll-call votes only
Plenary amendments15 tabled on this text
Amendments tabled for the plenary sitting on this text, in their own numbering series. This is a different set from the committee amendments tracked elsewhere on AmendEU, and is not counted in any of the site’s amendment totals.
- Amendment 1Motion for a resolution · Paragraph 28Current text
28.
TakesnoteoftheearlyterminationofthecontractwiththepreviousprovideroftheCrècheWayenbergafteranumberofseriousallegationsagainsttheformercontractor;reiteratesthatdecentworkingconditionsforexternalstaff,suchastraining,skillsdevelopment,andinvestmentinstaffwellbeingshould,whererelevant,beapriorityconsiderationinpublicprocurementofParliamentasamatterofprinciple;Amendment28. Expresses concern that the quality and continuity of services provided by Parliament’s Wayenberg Crèche have been affected by frequent changes of service providers since 2020, alongside challenges related to staff shortages, high staff absenteeism and staff turnover at the crèche; takes note of the award of the current contract for Parliament’s childcare services in Brussels to a new company established shortly after the publication of the tender and reportedly linked to the former provider, Esedra; recalls the early termination by the Parliament of the contract with the previous provider of the Crèche Wayenberg, Esedra after a number of serious allegations against that contractor; reite…
Excerpt — full text in the official PDF. - Amendment 2Motion for a resolution · Paragraph 28 a (new)Amendment
28a. Emphasises the need to ensure that Parliament’s crèche complies with the highest food safety standards; underlines that scientific evidence over the last ten years shows that infants and children are disproportionately exposed to the harmful effects of pesticides on their health and development, due to their higher intake relative to body weight and their developing physiology, including risks of cognitive impairments and developmental delays1; calls for consideration of the need for public procurement rules to include a requirement for the provision of 100% organic food, prioritising short supply chains and local suppliers, in order to reduce pesticide exposure and better protect child…
Excerpt — full text in the official PDF. - Amendment 3The LeftMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 3 a (new)Amendment
3a. Recalls that the daily allowance is a flat-rate sum covering accommodation, meals and related expenses each day that a Member is present at the European Parliament on official business; stresses that Members must sign an attendance register in order to benefit from the allowance; notes that there are exemptions for the President and the chairs of political groups who automatically benefit from it independently of their presence unless they explicitly request it; calls on Parliament to put an end to the exceptions for the President and the chairs of political groups, who should sign an attendance register like all other Members to benefit from their per-diem;
- Amendment 4The LeftMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 3 b (new)Amendment
3b. Calls for an adjustment of the Statute for Members of the European Parliament to cut the basic monthly salaries of Members by 50 %.
- Amendment 5The LeftMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 3 c (new)Amendment
3c. Underlines that the salaries and benefits of the highest-ranking EU officials, such as heads of directorates, are very generous, often exceeding EUR 250 000 annually; is concerned that such disproportionately high salaries distance those officials from the everyday lives, needs, and struggles of citizens; stresses that such remuneration does not effectively prevent corruption, as some EU officials have already been implicated in past corruption scandals, such as Qatargate;
- Amendment 6The LeftMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 4 a (new)Amendment
4a. Calls on the Council to suppress the transition allowances of former Memberss; asks that Members be able to apply for unemployment benefits in the same way as regular workers;
- Amendment 7The LeftMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 32 a (new)Amendment
32a. Calls for the dissolution of the optional pension scheme for Members;
- Amendment 8PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 8Current text
8. Welcomes the ongoing work of the Secretary-General in line with the reforms proposed by President Metsola on 16 June 2025 on administrative cooperation, planning and simplification aimed at enhancing efficiency, an efficient use of resources and achieving savings where possible; calls for strengthened reporting mechanisms to
enhancetransparencyand accountability; asks the Secretary-General to provide the Committee on Budgets with regular updates on the implementation of the Action Plan on administrative simplification and its impact in terms of budget and staff;Amendment8. Welcomes the ongoing work of the Secretary-General in line with the reforms proposed by President Metsola on 16 June 2025 on administrative cooperation, planning and simplification aimed at enhancing efficiency, an efficient use of resources and achieving savings where possible; calls for strengthened reporting mechanisms in order to guarantee transparency, equal treatment, political non-discrimination and accountability; asks the Secretary-General to provide the Committee on Budgets with regular updates on the implementation of the Action Plan on administrative simplification and its impact in terms of budget and staff;
- Amendment 9PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 8 a (new)Amendment
8 a. Underlines that the current financial circumstances affecting the Union budget, including Parliament’s budget, should be resolved through increased fiscal responsibility in the form of enhanced efficiency in respect of already assigned funds at all levels of implementation, as opposed to the creation of new own resources or increase in GNI contributions; condemns ongoing Union strategies which aim at introducing new costs and taxes to consumers in order to cover the ever-increasing expenses of the Union’s many agencies, institutions, funds and finance schemes;
- Amendment 10PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 16Current text
16.Takes note that the SPAAK building renovation starts to be carried out as of 2027;takesnote that the overall budget for the renovation has been set at EUR 455 million and that EUR 77,67 million are foreseen for 2027; underlines that these costs are not included in the budget 2027; stresses the need to ensure strict cost control, transparency and adherence to the planned budget;Amendment16. Takes note that the overall budget for the renovation of the Spaak building has been set at EUR 455 million and that EUR 77,67 million are foreseen for 2027; underlines that these costs are not included in the budget 2027; stresses the need to ensure strict cost control, transparency and adherence to the planned budget; is sceptical that the renovation of a single, already fully functioning building, should cost close to EUR 0,5 billion; demands a reduction in the costs of this undertaking; demands full transparency and the tracking of all expenses related to this undertaking to ensure accountability for those responsible for potential financial irregularities; expresses concern at the a…
Excerpt — full text in the official PDF. - Amendment 11PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 17Current text
17.
TakesnotethattheParliamentintendstocontract loans,includingwiththe European Investment Bank,for the financingoftheSPAAKrenovationproject;takesnotethat,inthebudget for 2027,costslinkedtointerest(EUR3,17million)andtotherepaymentofthecapital(EUR0,65million)areincluded;urgesthat,whererelevant,costsnotdirectlylinkedtotherenovation works should also be clearly listedandbudgeted;callsontheadministrationtokeep the CommitteeonBudgetscloselyinformedontheapplicableinterestratesfortheloansandthelong-termplanningoftherepaymentoftheprincipal; stressestheneedtoensureprudentdebtmanagement;Amendment17. Firmly opposes Parliament’s intention to resort to borrowing, including from the European Investment Bank, to finance the renovation of the Spaak building; condemns the use of borrowing to finance non-essential administrative expenditure, which constitutes irresponsible budgetary management and places an unjustified financial burden on future budgets and, ultimately, on European taxpayers; underlines that the budget for 2027 already includes costs related to interest (EUR 3,17 million) and capital repayment (EUR 0,65 million), thereby leading to a sustained increase in administrative expenditure; calls for the abandonment of recourse to borrowing for this project;
- Amendment 12PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 18 a (new)Amendment
18 a. Rejects the setting-up of Europa Experience spaces, considering them to constitute an unacceptable waste of public funds to the detriment of the real priorities of European citizens; underlines that maintaining high costs for these largely underused infrastructures constitutes inefficient and irresponsible management of budgetary resources; denounces the limited interest in these centres, whose attendance remains marginal, and criticises their use as a propaganda tool aimed at promoting an ever more centralised Union to the detriment of Member State sovereignty; rejects any attempt to extend this costly initiative; calls for the discontinuation of any further investment in such spaces;
- Amendment 13PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 25Current text
25.
Takes note ofthe significantincreases ofthecarbon credit prices which at current emission levels would need an estimated EUR 950 000 for 2027;callsontheadministrationtogiveprioritytodecreasingParliament’semissionsincludingbyincreasedinvestmentsincleanheating,ventilation,andairconditioningsystems,notablyheatpumpinstallationsinBrusselsandotherproportionateandcost-effectivemeasurestoloweremissionswherereasonable,overbuyingcarboncredits;welcomestheintroductionofanenhancedtrainofferformissionstoStrasbourgasofJune2025,asapositivesteptowardsreducingCO2emissions;Amendment25. Underlines the significant increase in carbon credit prices which at current emission levels would need an estimated EUR 950 000 for 2027; highlights that this cost reflects the ongoing surge in ETS prices, which are becoming unsurmountable for key sectors such as metallurgy and fertilizer production; remarks that the difficulties associated with decreasing Parliament’s emissions are insignificant compared to the expenses and other realities involved in reducing emissions in sectors with hard to abate emissions; calls, in the context of the ETS revision during the third quarter of 2026, for in depth impact assessments of the effect of ETS and its relevant phase-out targets on key sectors…
Excerpt — full text in the official PDF. - Amendment 14Renew, S&D, Verts/ALEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 10 a (new)Amendment
10a. Recalls that the duty to protect the Union’s financial interests applies equally to all beneficiaries of Union funds, including political groups operating within Parliament; notes that investigations and recovery actions concerning the suspected misuse of Union funds by the former Identity and Democracy group, reconfigured today as the Patriots for Europe Group, highlight the importance of robust internal controls, effective ex-post verification and swift recovery mechanisms within Parliament’s administration; calls on Parliament’s administration to complete all outstanding recovery proceedings without delay and to refer any evidence of irregular expenditure to OLAF and the EPPO; stress…
Excerpt — full text in the official PDF. - Amendment 15S&D, RenewMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 27 a (new)Amendment
27a. Welcomes the recent initiatives endorsed by the Conference of Presidents and the Bureau to allow Members in the perinatal period to vote by proxy, recognising this as a positive step towards greater inclusiveness in parliamentary work and calls on all parties to swiftly implement the measure; insists, however, that the measure falls short of Parliament’s repeated calls to ensure voting rights not just for Members in the perinatal period, but also for Members on parental or paternity leave or facing certified long-term illness;
Official amendment documents
Members who amended this procedure
25 Members · by amendment count
























The amendments, in full text
99 amendmentsEvery amendment as tabled — original text, proposed change and justification, with a link to the official PDF.