EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for Ukraine
Resolution on a topical subject.
In this non-legislative resolution, Parliament sets out the EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for Ukraine. It urges the EU and its Member States to assume more responsibility for European security and provide unwavering support to Ukraine, insisting that nothing about Ukraine should be decided without Ukraine and nothing about Europe without Europe, and stresses that any peace must be grounded in international law and preserve Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity. The text states that any agreement must be preceded by a ceasefire, must not limit Ukraine's ability to defend itself, must offer credible security guarantees, and must oblige Russia to fully compensate Ukraine and guarantee accountability for the crime of aggression and war crimes before the International Criminal Court and the Special Tribunal. It calls on Member States to adopt a reparation loan backed by frozen Russian assets, states that occupied territory will not be recognised as Russian, and insists that no sanctions be lifted before a peace agreement is negotiated and implemented.
No committee amendments are tracked on AmendEU for this procedure; this page follows its roll-call votes in plenary instead.
Voted 27 Nov 2025
Full session brief →Other votes on this text · 24 votes
- ✕On amendment 3 · text to be inserted after paragraph 1122 / 391 / 63↗
- ✕On amendment 6 · text to be inserted after paragraph 189 / 441 / 47↗
- ✕On amendment 7 · text to be inserted after paragraph 184 / 441 / 51↗
- ✕On amendment 8 · text to be inserted after paragraph 1110 / 375 / 82↗
- ✕On amendment 9 · text to be inserted after paragraph 1145 / 390 / 42↗
- ✕On amendment 10 · text to be inserted after paragraph 1127 / 395 / 56↗
- ✕On amendment 11 · text to be inserted after paragraph 188 / 426 / 60↗
- ✕On amendment 12 · text to be inserted after paragraph 1158 / 380 / 42↗
- ✕On amendment 2 · paragraph 2121 / 404 / 36↗
- ✕On amendment 13 · paragraph 285 / 443 / 46↗
- ✓On paragraph 2 (part 1 of a split vote)549 / 20 / 9↗
- ✕On amendment 14 · text to be inserted after paragraph 247 / 459 / 68↗
- ✓On paragraph 4470 / 42 / 61↗
- ✓On paragraph 5 (part 2 of a split vote)418 / 105 / 45↗
- ✓On paragraph 6454 / 41 / 67↗
- ✓On paragraph 7 (part 1 of a split vote)431 / 122 / 18↗
- ✓On paragraph 7 (part 2 of a split vote)460 / 80 / 22↗
- ✓On paragraph 8 (part 1 of a split vote)490 / 44 / 32↗
- ✓On paragraph 8 (part 2 of a split vote)460 / 72 / 34↗
- ✓On paragraph 8 (part 3 of a split vote)503 / 37 / 29↗
- ✓On paragraph 10440 / 56 / 65↗
- ✕On amendment 4 · text to be inserted after paragraph 11163 / 364 / 39↗
- ✕On amendment 5 · text to be inserted after recital A111 / 440 / 22↗
- ✕On amendment 1 · text to be inserted after recital B130 / 373 / 63↗
Plenary amendments14 tabled on this text
Amendments tabled for the plenary sitting on this text, in their own numbering series. This is a different set from the committee amendments tracked elsewhere on AmendEU, and is not counted in any of the site’s amendment totals.
- Amendment 1PfEJoint motion for a resolution · Recital B (new)Amendment
B. whereas on 10 November 2025, the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (SAPO) carried out dozens of raids as part of an investigation into a large-scale corruption scandal in Ukraine’s strategic energy sector, where NABU confirmed it had found evidence of kickbacks and alleged money laundering amounting to USD 100 million, and whereas these revelations expose serious risks to the integrity of Ukraine’s governance and to the oversight of European aid;
- Amendment 2PfEJoint motion for a resolution · Paragraph 2Current text
2.
NotestheUS administration’s efforts towards ending Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, but considers that US policy ambivalence towards Ukraineisdetrimentaltotheobjectiveofachieving sustainable peace; presses, therefore, fortheEU and its Member States to show leadership at this crucial geopolitical moment and continueworkingwiththeUnitedStatesandlike-mindedpartnerstoensurethatnegotiationsforajustandlastingpeaceforUkrainearegroundedintheprinciplesofinternationallaw,conductedingoodfaithandstriveforadefinitiveendtoRussia’swarofaggressionagainstUkraine;Amendment2. Commends the peace initiative launched by the President of the United States, Donald Trump, since he took office; underlines that peace achieved as soon as possible via diplomatic means is in the interest of the peoples of both Ukraine and the EU; repeats that there is no military solution to the conflict that would favour Ukraine;
- Amendment 3PfEJoint motion for a resolution · Paragraph 1 a (new)Amendment
1a. Underlines that the original 28-point plan produced by the United States constitutes a useful working basis for peace negotiations between Russia and Ukraine; welcomes US Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s statement that points related to the EU and NATO will be discussed separately with the organisations’ respective Member States; considers that, in line with the US plan, a fully fledged peace deal on Ukraine could also be a unique opportunity to solve long-lasting issues between the EU and Russia;
- Amendment 4PfEJoint motion for a resolution · Paragraph 11a (new)Amendment
11a. Requests clarification from the Commission regarding whether any EU funds, whether disbursed directly to Ukrainian state institutions or indirectly via implementing partners, international organisations or non-governmental organisation (NGO) channels, are implicated in the corruption cases currently under investigation in Ukraine; asks the Commission to put in place strong oversight and rigorous audit procedures for all assistance provided to Ukraine, especially in the light of the recent cases of corruption and misappropriation in the country, which make it all the more necessary to ensure strict and robust control over future disbursements;
- Amendment 5The LeftJoint motion for a resolution · Recital A a (new)Amendment
Aa. whereas diplomatic initiatives seeking to end the war have been completely absent from EU foreign policy; whereas the exclusion of the EU leadership from the negotiations is a consequence of their completely unrealistic militaristic approach and alignment with the United States and NATO;
- Amendment 6The LeftJoint motion for a resolution · Recital 1 a (new)Amendment
1a. Expresses profound concern that the EU, rather than championing diplomacy, has become largely irrelevant in the design of peace initiatives, despite the war taking place on its continent and having direct consequences for EU citizens; deplores the EU’s persistent militaristic posture, its refusal to promote dialogue, its uncritical alignment with strategies that have prolonged the conflict, and its inability to articulate an autonomous and credible peace agenda; calls for the EU institutions to actively support and facilitate a peace process, drawing necessary lessons from previous experiences so as not to repeat past mistakes; calls for the EU to actively work towards a durable and comp…
Excerpt — full text in the official PDF. - Amendment 7The LeftJoint motion for a resolution · Recital 1 b (new)Amendment
1b. Regrets the failure of the Istanbul negotiations of spring 2022, which had opened a rare and fragile window for a negotiated settlement; recalls that several international mediators confirmed that meaningful progress had been made; expresses deep concern that this opportunity was not sustained or allowed to mature into a comprehensive agreement, resulting in the continuation of a devastating war whose human, social and economic costs have fallen primarily on regular citizens; calls on all parties, the EU and international partners to draw lessons from this missed opportunity and to support renewed diplomatic channels without preconditions;
- Amendment 8The LeftJoint motion for a resolution · Recital 1 c (new)Amendment
1c. Expresses deep concern over recent major corruption scandals in Ukraine, which raise doubts about the use of taxpayer money by the EU institutions and generate distrust among European citizens; insists on strict democratic oversight, transparent public accounting, international auditing, anti-corruption conditionality and the creation of an independent international oversight mechanism to prevent the diversion of resources and wartime profiteering;
- Amendment 9The LeftJoint motion for a resolution · Recital 1 d (new)Amendment
1d. Calls for the EU to urgently launch an ambitious diplomatic initiative to secure an immediate ceasefire and put an end to the war in Ukraine and the suffering of the Ukrainian people; calls for increased efforts to finally initiate a peace negotiation process that includes all parties;
- Amendment 10The LeftJoint motion for a resolution · Recital 1 e (new)Amendment
1e. Calls for the EU and its Member States to use all existing diplomatic initiatives to work on a comprehensive plan for long-term peace and collective security on the European continent;
- Amendment 11The LeftJoint motion for a resolution · Recital 1 f (new)Amendment
1f. Calls on the Commission and the Council to present a new architecture for European collective security, based on the principles of the UN Charter and the Helsinki Final Act in order to guarantee peace and security for all on the European continent;
- Amendment 12The LeftJoint motion for a resolution · Recital 1 g (new)Amendment
1g. Firmly believes that diplomacy prevents and ends wars and should be a core part of EU action;
- Amendment 13The LeftJoint motion for a resolution · Paragraph 2Current text
2. Notes the US administration’s efforts towards ending Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, but considers that US policy ambivalence towards Ukraine is detrimental to the objective of achieving sustainable peace;
presses,therefore,fortheEUanditsMemberStatestoshowleadershipatthiscrucialgeopoliticalmomentandcontinueworkingwiththe United States andlike-mindedpartnerstoensurethatnegotiationsforajustandlastingpeaceforUkrainearegroundedintheprinciplesofinternationallaw,conductedingoodfaithandstriveforadefinitiveendtoRussia’swarofaggressionagainstUkraine;Amendment2. Notes the US administration’s efforts towards ending Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, but considers that US policy ambivalence towards Ukraine is detrimental to the objective of achieving sustainable peace; notes with concern that the deal proposed by the US administration contained clear benefits for the United States, including the funnelling of profits stemming from frozen Russian assets to the United States and advantageous passages on the extraction of minerals and natural resources; presses, therefore, for the EU and its Member States to show leadership at this crucial geopolitical moment and continue working with the United States and like-minded partners to ensure that…
Excerpt — full text in the official PDF. - Amendment 14The LeftJoint motion for a resolution · Paragraph 2 a (new)Amendment
2a. Recalls that the mineral deal signed between the United States and Ukraine in April 2025 may be incompatible with the EU acquis;
The bar reads votes for (green), against (terracotta) and abstentions (grey). How voting works → Vote data: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL, attribution) / European Parliament, roll-call votes only.