The rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response
Resolution on a topical subject.
In this non-legislative resolution, Parliament addresses the rule of law, fundamental rights and the misuse of EU funds in Slovakia and the need for an EU response, grounding the issue in Article 2 TEU values, the Charter of Fundamental Rights, the Rule of Law Conditionality Regulation and the Whistleblower Directive. The text recalls Parliament's earlier resolutions on Slovakia, the findings of committee missions by the Committee on Budgetary Control and the Democracy, Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights Monitoring Group, and concerns raised by the European Public Prosecutor's Office that proposed amendments to whistleblower protection legislation may be incompatible with rule of law principles and may negatively affect the EU's financial interests. It cites indicators such as Slovakia's 2025 Corruption Perceptions Index score and stresses that Member States must ensure there is no backsliding in the protection of Article 2 TEU values. The resolution was adopted on 20 May 2026.
No committee amendments are tracked on AmendEU for this procedure; this page follows its roll-call votes in plenary instead.
Voted 20 May 2026
Full session brief →Other votes on this text · 17 votes
- ✕On amendment 2 · paragraph 1192 / 451 / 4↗
- ✕On amendment 12 · text to be inserted after paragraph 1193 / 431 / 8↗
- ✓On paragraph 2435 / 190 / 16↗
- ✕On amendment 3 · paragraph 4189 / 440 / 10↗
- ✓On paragraph 6418 / 210 / 9↗
- ✓On paragraph 11 (part 1 of a split vote)474 / 73 / 91↗
- ✕On amendment 13 · text to be inserted after paragraph 14204 / 432 / 8↗
- ✕On amendment 4 · paragraph 15184 / 454 / 6↗
- ✓On paragraph 15 (part 2 of a split vote)635 / 4 / 3↗
- ✓On paragraph 19 (part 1 of a split vote)572 / 37 / 37↗
- ✓On paragraph 19 (part 2 of a split vote)463 / 151 / 28↗
- ✓On paragraph 21465 / 122 / 42↗
- ✓On citation 7426 / 192 / 17↗
- ✓On citation 11464 / 134 / 30↗
- ✓On citation 25451 / 145 / 52↗
- ✕On amendment 1 · text to be inserted after recital C201 / 438 / 4↗
- ✕On amendment 10 · text to be inserted after recital D187 / 440 / 18↗
Plenary amendments16 tabled on this text
Amendments tabled for the plenary sitting on this text, in their own numbering series. This is a different set from the committee amendments tracked elsewhere on AmendEU, and is not counted in any of the site’s amendment totals.
- Amendment 1ESNMotion for a resolution · Recital C a (new)Amendment
Ca. whereas, pursuant to Article 4(2) TEU, the EU is bound to respect the equality of Member States before the Treaties as well as their national identities, inherent in their fundamental political and constitutional structures; whereas the assessment of the rule of law must be carried out objectively, impartially and on the basis of clearly established legal criteria, and must not be used as an instrument of political pressure against democratically elected governments or national parliaments;
- Amendment 2ESNMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 1Current text
Expresses deep concern over the deterioration of democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights in Slovakia; highlights that verifiable adherence by the Member States to both the rule of law and the Charter must be regarded as an essential precondition to receiving any EU funds; underlinesthat all programmes and investments financed by the EU budget must serve the public interest;stresses that systemic deficiencies in the rule of law, in particular in the independence of the judiciary and in audit and control systems, endanger the protection of the EU’s financial interests;AmendmentUnderlines that all programmes and investments financed by the EU budget must serve the public interest;
- Amendment 3ESNMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 4Current text
4.
Expresses deep concernaboutthe constitutional amendments in Slovakia,in particular those restricting fundamentalrights,theruleoflawandtheprimacyofEUlaw;noteswithconcernthatcivilsocietyorganisationshavewarnedthattheseamendmentsmayviolatefundamentalrights;stressesthatconstitutionalprovisions mustbeformulatedwithsufficientprecisiontoprevent arbitrary interpretation and must fully comply with obligationsunderEU law, includingtheCharter, as well as international human rights standards;recallsthat theprimacyofEUlawand thebinding natureofinternational obligations must befullyrespectedandthatnoconstitutionalprovisioncanjustifynon-co…Amendment4. Fully respects the constitutional amendments in Slovakia, emphasising that the right to amend and adopt a national constitution is a sovereign and exclusive prerogative of each Member State; underlines that such processes are an expression of national constitutional identity, which the EU is bound to respect under the Treaties; recognises that the internal organisation of public authorities and the formulation of constitutional provisions fall within the primary competence of the Member States;
Excerpt — full text in the official PDF. - Amendment 4ESNMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 15Current text
15.
Expresses deep concernaboutthedeterioration of media freedom and pluralism in Slovakia, including political interference in public service media, pressure on journalists through a climate of hostility, smear campaignsanddisinformation, the useofstrategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs), including by high-ranking political figures, andtherisk of a concentration ofmediaownership inpoliticallyalignedhands,combinedwithdismissalsofkey cultural institution leaders,whichriskcreatingachillingeffectonpressfreedomandpublic discourse; stresses that aweakenedmediaenvironmentsignificantlyreducesdemocraticscrutinyandfacilitates corruptionintheim…Amendment15. Stresses that the regulation and organisation of the media landscape are part of the sovereign prerogative of the Member States, while emphasising the fundamental principle that journalists and media outlets should maintain strict impartiality, professional independence and objectivity in their reporting;
Excerpt — full text in the official PDF. - Amendment 5S&DMotion for a resolution · Recital SCurrent text
S. whereas amendments to the Constitution adopted on 26 September 2025 introduced provisions relating to adoption, educational activities and the constitutional definition of
sex;whereas the Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe and the Venice Commission have expressed concerns about these amendments;AmendmentS. whereas amendments to the Constitution adopted on 26 September 2025 introduced provisions relating to adoption, educational activities and the constitutional definition of sex, which do not comply with the recommendations made by the Venice Commission; whereas these new provisions discriminate against LGBTIQ+ persons; whereas the Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe and the Venice Commission have expressed concerns about these amendments;
- Amendment 6S&DMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 2Current text
2. Calls on the Commission to assess whether there could be a clear risk of a serious breach by Slovakia of the values referred to in Article 2 TEU; calls, furthermore, on the Commission to make full use of all available instruments to address concerns regarding democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights, starting with preventive and cooperative tools within the framework of its annual rule of law report, with a view to ensuring compliance with the values enshrined in Article 2 TEU; stresses, however, that where concerns persist and are duly substantiated, the Commission should not hesitate to make use of all enforcement measures at its disposal to protect the EU budget and uphold the…
Amendment2. Calls on the Commission to assess whether there could be a clear risk of a serious breach by Slovakia of the values referred to in Article 2 TEU; calls, furthermore, on the Commission to make full use of all available instruments to address concerns regarding democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights, starting with preventive and cooperative tools within the framework of its annual rule of law report, with a view to ensuring compliance with the values enshrined in Article 2 TEU; stresses, however, that where concerns persist and are duly substantiated, the Commission should not hesitate to make use of all enforcement measures at its disposal to protect the EU budget and uphold the…
Excerpt — full text in the official PDF. - Amendment 7S&DMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 4Current text
4. Expresses deep concern about the constitutional amendments in Slovakia, in particular those restricting fundamental rights, the rule of law and the primacy of EU law; notes with concern that civil society organisations have warned that these amendments may violate fundamental rights; stresses that constitutional provisions must be formulated with sufficient precision to prevent arbitrary interpretation and must fully comply with obligations under EU law, including the Charter, as well as international human rights standards; recalls that the primacy of EU law and the binding nature of international obligations must be fully respected and that no constitutional provision can justify non-co…
Amendment4. Expresses deep concern about the constitutional amendments in Slovakia, in particular those restricting fundamental rights, the rule of law and the primacy of EU law; notes with concern that civil society organisations have warned that these amendments may violate fundamental rights; stresses that constitutional provisions must be formulated with sufficient precision to prevent arbitrary interpretation and must fully comply with obligations under EU law, including the Charter, as well as international human rights standards; recalls that the primacy of EU law and the binding nature of international obligations must be fully respected and that no constitutional provision can justify non-co…
Excerpt — full text in the official PDF. - Amendment 8S&DMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 19Current text
19. Calls on the Slovak authorities to ensure the effective prevention and combating of violence against women and domestic violence in law and in practice, in accordance with EU law and international human rights law; reiterates the importance of the ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence without delay and of bringing the legal definition of rape in line with international human rights
standards;Amendment19. Calls on the Slovak authorities to ensure the effective prevention and combating of violence against women and domestic violence in law and in practice, in accordance with EU law and international human rights law; reiterates the importance of the ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (the Istanbul Convention) without delay and of bringing the legal definition of rape in line with international human rights standards, and calls on the Slovak authorities to do both without delay;
- Amendment 9S&DMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 20Current text
20. Calls on the Slovak authorities, in view of the backlash provoked by several legislative initiatives in Slovakia, particularly since 2023, to ensure full compliance with their obligations to guarantee effective, timely and non-discriminatory access to sexual and reproductive health and
rights;recalls that these obligations derive from international human rights standards and are integral to the protection of fundamental rights, including the rights to private and family life, health and non-discrimination;Amendment20. Calls on the Slovak authorities, in view of the backlash provoked by several legislative initiatives in Slovakia, particularly since 2023, to ensure full compliance with their obligations to guarantee effective, timely and non-discriminatory access to sexual and reproductive health and rights, including access to safe and legal abortion; recalls that these obligations derive from international human rights standards and are integral to the protection of fundamental rights, including the rights to private and family life, health and non-discrimination;
- Amendment 10PfEMotion for a resolution · Recital D a (new)Amendment
Da. whereas the Commission has applied blatant double standards in respect of the rule of law; whereas rule of law debates and reports have been abused and weaponised against governments that defend their sovereignty in line with the EU Treaties;
- Amendment 11PfEMotion for a resolution · Recital Z a (new)Amendment
Za. whereas upon its accession to the EU in 2004, the Slovak Republic acknowledged that the Beneš Decrees were to be regarded as historical legal acts without continuing legal effect; whereas serious concerns remain over the continued application of the Beneš Decrees in Slovakia, including cases of land confiscation affecting members of the Hungarian community and other minorities;
- Amendment 12PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 1 a (new)Amendment
1a. Condemns any attempt to use rule of law reports or other mechanisms to blackmail democratically elected governments; calls on the Commission to apply rule of law principles equally to all Member States and applicant countries; condemns the double standards applied by the Commission with regard to human rights; calls on the Commission and Parliament to adhere to rule of law principles and the principle of non-interference in domestic politics and national elections;
- Amendment 13PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 14 a (new)Amendment
14a. Recalls that the European Court of Auditors, in its special report 11/2025, found that while NGOs have a strong influence on the EU’s decision-making process, there is a lack of transparency regarding the EU funding granted to these entities; expresses serious concern over grave irregularities in the management of European taxpayers’ funds in the case of the NGO Projekt Fórum, which, according to publicly available information, led to an order for the recovery of EUR 113 400 by the European Education and Culture Executive Agency in connection with the project Mirrors of Europe;
- Amendment 14PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 24 a (new)Amendment
24a. Calls on the Slovak Republic to cease the application of any legal provisions deriving from the principle of collective guilt, linked to the Beneš Decrees, which continue to produce legal effects today, in particular where they undermine property rights, freedom of expression and the rights of persons belonging to national minorities;
- Amendment 15PPEMotion for a resolution · Recital WCurrent text
W. whereas on 11 December 2025, the Slovak Parliament amended the Criminal Code in order to criminalise
‘denialof thepost-WorldWar IIpeace settlement’;whereas on2February2022,theAdvisoryCommitteeontheFrameworkConventionfortheProtectionofNationalMinoritiesinvitedtheSlovakauthoritiestoenterintodialoguewithrepresentativesofthe nationalminoritiesconcernedaboutanypossiblenegativeeffectsofthe1945regulationonconfiscationofpropertyoncurrentinterethnicrelations;AmendmentW. whereas on 11 December 2025, the Slovak Parliament amended the Criminal Code in order to criminalise the questioning of the ‘post-World War II decrees’; whereas this recently adopted law risks creating a chilling effect on freedom of expression and academic freedom, as protected under the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union; whereas the continued confiscation of land on the basis of the above mentioned decrees that have been applied in particular to citizens belonging to the Hungarian national minority is in fact a land grabbing scheme, which has deprived hundreds of owners of valuable land and raises concerns regarding legal certainty and respect for the rule of law; wher…
Excerpt — full text in the official PDF. - Amendment 16PPEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 23 a (new)Amendment
23a. Expresses grave concern regarding administrative and judicial practices involving the Slovak Land Fund and the Forests of the Slovak Republic state enterprise resulting in uncompensated land and forest confiscations on the basis of post-war decrees; calls on the Slovak authorities to repeal the amendment of the Criminal Code, suspend all legal proceedings, and end any ongoing land confiscations;
The bar reads votes for (green), against (terracotta) and abstentions (grey). How voting works → Vote data: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL, attribution) / European Parliament, roll-call votes only.