Strengthening Europol’s mandate: entry of alerts in SIS
Dossier on strengthening Europol's mandate as regards the entry of alerts in the Schengen Information System (SIS). Amendments, including proposals to reject the Commission proposal, revise recitals on Europol, the SIS as a security tool, information from third countries and Interpol, foreign terrorist fighters, creating a specific category of alert, democratic oversight of Europol, and necessity and proportionality.
Procedure timeline
- Committee amendments tabled7 Jun 2021
- Plenary vote — Passed8 Jun 2022 · On the provisional agreement negotiated with the Council (the trilogue deal) — amendment 50
- Procedure completed
Plenary votes
2 roll-call votesIn plenary, Parliament usually votes in steps: first on amendments to the text (sometimes split into parts, so Members can accept one half of a sentence and reject the other), then on the text as a whole. The “main vote” is the one that adopts or rejects the text itself. Each vote below shows exactly which step it was. How voting works →
- 21 Oct 2021Passedoutcome from totalsStrengthening Europol’s mandate: entry of alerts in SIS545 for147 against4 abstentions9 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 8 Jun 2022Main votePassedoutcome from totalsOn the provisional agreement negotiated with the Council (the trilogue deal) — amendment 50Official label: Accord provisoire - Am 50 · what was voted ↗470 for118 against16 abstentions101 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
Vote data: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL, attribution) / European Parliament · roll-call votes only
Official amendment documents
Connections
See these connections as a navigable graph — and walk from there to anything else.
Explore the graphMembers who amended this procedure
16 Members · by amendment countThe amendments, in full text
139 amendmentsEvery amendment as tabled — original text, proposed change and justification, with a link to the official PDF.