Market stability reserve for the buildings, road transport and additional sectors
As published by the Parliament (checked 27 Jul 2026) — agendas can change until the session opens. Full calendar →
This is a legislative procedure on the market stability reserve for the buildings, road transport and additional sectors. The amendments dispute changes to the reserve's price-containment mechanisms for the emissions trading system (ETS2), demand an impact assessment, and warn of climate and social consequences, with some seeking to strengthen or abolish ETS2 and to strengthen the Social Climate Fund. They adjust thresholds, allowance-release volumes and validity, and the system's postponement.
Procedure timeline
- Committee amendments tabled17 Mar 2026
- Plenary vote — Adopted29 Apr 2026 · On the Commission proposal (the draft law)
- In progress — not yet concluded
Plenary votes
12 roll-call votesIn plenary, Parliament usually votes in steps: first on amendments to the text (sometimes split into parts, so Members can accept one half of a sentence and reject the other), then on the text as a whole. The “main vote” is the one that adopts or rejects the text itself. Each vote below shows exactly which step it was. How voting works →
Show the 9 earlier votes
- 29 Apr 2026AdoptedOn the lead committee's amendments · amendment 1Official label: Amendements de la commission compétente - votes séparés - Am 1 · what was voted ↗428 for186 against29 abstentions76 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 29 Apr 2026AdoptedOn the lead committee's amendments · amendment 4Official label: Amendements de la commission compétente - votes séparés - Am 4 · what was voted ↗404 for202 against31 abstentions82 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 29 Apr 2026AdoptedOn the lead committee's amendments · amendment 8Official label: Amendements de la commission compétente - votes séparés - Am 8 · what was voted ↗361 for242 against36 abstentions80 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 29 Apr 2026RejectedOn amendment 25 · paragraph 1 · point 4 · article 1Official label: Article 1, § 1, point 4 - Am 25 · what was voted ↗236 for400 against4 abstentions79 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 29 Apr 2026RejectedOn amendment 20 · article 1Official label: Après l'article 1 - Am 20 · what was voted ↗212 for418 against13 abstentions76 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 29 Apr 2026RejectedOn amendment 26 · article 1Official label: Après l'article 1 - Am 26 · what was voted ↗242 for382 against8 abstentions87 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 29 Apr 2026RejectedOn amendment 17 · text to be inserted after recital 6Official label: Après le considérant 6 - Am 17 · what was voted ↗218 for419 against9 abstentions73 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 29 Apr 2026RejectedOn amendment 23 · text to be inserted after recital 6Official label: Après le considérant 6 - Am 23 · what was voted ↗236 for397 against14 abstentions72 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 29 Apr 2026RejectedOn amendment 24 · text to be inserted after recital 6Official label: Après le considérant 6 - Am 24 · what was voted ↗236 for392 against14 abstentions77 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 29 Apr 2026AdoptedOn a request to refer the text back to committeeOfficial label: Demande de renvoi en commission · what was voted ↗568 for24 against42 abstentions85 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 29 Apr 2026RejectedOn amendment 27 · article 1Official label: Après l'article 1 - Am 27 · what was voted ↗261 for379 against6 abstentions73 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
- 29 Apr 2026Main voteAdoptedOn the Commission proposal (the draft law)Official label: Proposition de la Commission · what was voted ↗433 for120 against91 abstentions75 did not voteForAgainstAbst.
Click a group to see each Member’s position.
Vote data: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL, attribution) / European Parliament · roll-call votes only
Plenary amendments27 tabled on this text
Amendments tabled for the plenary sitting on this text, in their own numbering series. This is a different set from the committee amendments tracked elsewhere on AmendEU, and is not counted in any of the site’s amendment totals.
- Amendment 1Proposal for a decision · Recital 1 a (new)Amendment
(1a) The conclusions of the European Council of 12 December 2019 endorse the objective of achieving a climate-neutral Union by 2050, in line with the objectives of the Paris Agreement.
- Amendment 2Proposal for a decision · Recital 3Current text
(3) The analysis carried out of the expected functioning of the reserve, taking into account recent information, indicates that targeted amendments to some parameters would contribute to improving market predictability and to the stability of price movements in the early years of the new system.
Amendment(3) The analysis carried out of the expected functioning of the reserve, taking into account recent information, indicates that targeted amendments to some parameters would contribute to improving market predictability and to the stability of price movements in the early years of the new system. In order for those amendments not to hinder the Union’s decarbonisation efforts, further action by the Member States is necessary. According to the European Central Bank, green investment in the Union remains below the levels required to meet the 2030 decarbonisation target. Therefore, Member States need to remain vigilant against the risk of a green funding gap.
- Amendment 3Proposal for a decision · Recital 3 a (new)Amendment
(3a) The implementation of the emissions trading system for the buildings, road transport and additional sectors needs to be accompanied by complementary decarbonisation measures which are the most effective tool for helping households reduce fossil fuel dependency and therefore mitigating the impact of the ETS2 on consumers, given that fuel demand in buildings and transport remains largely inelastic in the short term. Member States are obliged to use the revenues from the auction of allowances for the purposes pursuant to Article 30d(6) of Directive 2003/87/EC, giving priority to activities that can contribute to addressing the social aspects of emissions trading under ETS2. Therefore, it w…
Excerpt — full text in the official PDF. - Amendment 4Proposal for a decision · Recital 4Current text
(4) In order to increase long-term market predictability, the allowances placed in the reserve for the buildings, road transport and additional sectors that have not been released should remain valid
beyond31 December2030.Amendment(4) In order to increase long-term market predictability, the allowances placed in the reserve for the buildings, road transport and additional sectors that have not been released should remain valid until 31 December 2033 and partially until 31 December 2035. Within four years of the start of the operation of ETS2, the Commission should conduct an impact assessment, including a distributional impact assessment, and an evaluation of the environmental, social and economic impact of the remaining allowances in the reserve.
- Amendment 5Proposal for a decision · Recital 6Current text
(6) In order to further improve its reactivity to unwarranted price fluctuations and increase market predictability, the mechanism to enhance price stability in the first three years of the emissions trading system for buildings, road transport and additional sectors should be strengthened in a careful manner. This could involve releasing a higher volume of allowances in the
market.If the measure is applied twice during the same 12 months period, the additional release should occur twice.Amendment(6) In order to further improve its reactivity to unwarranted price fluctuations and increase market predictability, the mechanism to enhance price stability in the first three years of the emissions trading system for buildings, road transport and additional sectors should be strengthened in a careful manner. This could involve releasing a higher volume of allowances in the market without delay. If the measure is applied twice during the same 12 months period, the additional release should occur twice.
- Amendment 6Proposal for a decision · Recital 6 a (new)Amendment
(6a) Excessive allowance price levels within the emissions trading system for the buildings, road transport and additional sectors could still have disproportionate impacts on vulnerable households, while excessive price fluctuations might not be limited to an occurrence twice a year. In the context of the review of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, it is essential that further social safeguarding measures be considered, and it may be appropriate for stronger price curtailment instruments to be considered by the Commission to guarantee price stability in the long term. In this regard, the Commission could consider a list of options such as strengthening and…
Excerpt — full text in the official PDF. - Amendment 7Proposal for a decision · Recital 6 b (new)Amendment
(6b) Following the revision of the market stability reserve provided for in this amending Decision, it would be appropriate for the Commission to conduct an impact assessment of the emissions trading system for the buildings, road transport and additional sectors to assess its social impact and its impact on meeting the climate goals, as well as a distributional assessment of the number of vulnerable households for which support has been made available from the Social Climate Fund and the EIB Frontloading Facility by that date, including, as feasible, a breakdown by type of geographical area, by income distribution and by gender which needs to also consider additional measures to ensure both…
Excerpt — full text in the official PDF. - Amendment 8Proposal for a decision · Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 · Decision (EU) 2015/1814 · Article 1a – paragraph 3Current text
(1) In paragraph 3, the second sentence is
deleted;Amendment(1) In paragraph 3, the second sentence is replaced by the following: ‘From 1 January 2034, 50% of the allowances referred to in that subparagraph that have not been released from the reserve shall no longer be valid. From 1 January 2036, the remaining allowances referred to in that subparagraph that have not been released from the reserve shall no longer be valid.’;
- Amendment 9Proposal for a decision · Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new) · Decision (EU) 2015/1814 · Article 1a – paragraph 7Current text
Thevolumes to be released from the reserve shall be evenly distributed over a period of three months, starting no later thantwomonthsafter the date on which the conditions were met according to the publication in that regard in the Official Journal of the European Union pursuant to Article 30h(8) of Directive2003/87/EC.Amendment(4a) In paragraph 7, the second sentence is replaced by the following: ‘The volumes to be released from the reserve shall be evenly distributed over a period of three months, starting no later than 30 days after the date on which the conditions were met according to the publication in that regard in the Official Journal of the European Union pursuant to Article 30h(8) of Directive 2003/87/EC.’.
- Amendment 10Proposal for a decision · Article 1 a (new) · Decision (EU) 2015/1814 · Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new)Amendment
Article 1a In Article 3 of Decision (EU) 2015/1814, the following paragraph is added: ‘Within four years of the start of the operation of emissions trading for buildings, road transport and additional sectors set out in Chapter IVa of Directive 2003/87/EC, the Commission shall carry out an impact assessment, including a distributional impact assessment, and an evaluation of the environmental, social and economic impact of the remaining allowances in the reserve under Article 1a of this Decision, and determine the appropriateness of partially or entirely invalidating those allowances. That evaluation shall, where appropriate, be accompanied by a legislative proposal.’.
- Amendment 11The LeftProposal for a decision
Replaces or inserts a longer passage — full text in the official document.
- Amendment 12ESNProposal for a decision · Recital 3 a (new)Amendment
(3a) Prior to the comprehensive review of the Union Emissions Trading Framework, including the existing Union Emissions Trading System (ETS1), ETS2 and the Market Stability Reserve, scheduled for July 2026, no anticipated changes to the Market Stability Reserve should be adopted that could pre-empt the outcome of that overall review, jeopardise legal consistency or create additional cost risks for citizens, businesses and Member States under ETS2.
- Amendment 13ESNProposal for a decision · Recital 3 b (new)Amendment
(3b) Since ETS2 for buildings and road transport may entail significant additional costs for households, businesses and consumers, anticipated changes to the market stability reserve for ETS2 should be rejected until the comprehensive review of the Union emissions trading framework scheduled for July 2026. This is all the more so since the Social Climate Fund is time-limited, covers funding only for the period from 2026 to 2032, requires national co-financing of at least 25 % by Member Statesand is contingent upon the timely submission of national social climate plans, so there is no certainty that effective social compensation can be ensured in a timely manner. At the same time, recent Euro…
Excerpt — full text in the official PDF. - Amendment 14ESNProposal for a decision · Recital 4 a (new)Amendment
(4a) Several Member States have already introduced national instruments for pricing CO₂ emissions or other regulatory measures that address emissions from buildings and road transport. Against this background, anticipated changes to the market stability reserve for ETS2 should not lead to a Union-wide pre-determination that undermines existing national measures or disproportionately restricts the room for manoeuvre of Member States in setting policy. In accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union, the functioning of the market stability reserve for ETS2 should only be reassessed in the light of the comprehensive review of the Union em…
Excerpt — full text in the official PDF. - Amendment 15ESNProposal for a decision · Recital 4 b (new)Amendment
(4b) Since the market stability reserve for ETS2 has a direct impact on the availability of allowances and therefore on the functioning of the system, changes to its parameters should not be decided on the basis of mere expectations but only after a comprehensive assessment of actual market and price developments.
- Amendment 16ESNProposal for a decision · Article 2Current text
This Decision shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European
Union.AmendmentThis Decision shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union only if the Commission has previously confirmed, in the context of the comprehensive review of the Union Emissions Trading Framework, including the existing Union Emissions Trading System (ETS1), ETS2 and the Market Stability Reserve, scheduled for July 2026, that the amendments provided for in this Decision are consistent with the results of that review. In the absence of such confirmation, this Decision shall not enter into force.
- Amendment 17PfEProposal for a decision · Recital 6 a (new)Amendment
(6 a) Chapter IVa of Directive 2003/87/EC introduced a separate emissions trading system (ETS2) for fuels used in buildings, road transport and additional sectors. This system risks increasing the cost of living across the Union, especially for vulnerable groups. At a time when many Union citizens are already facing persistent inflation, high energy prices and economic uncertainty, the introduction of ETS2 risks further exacerbating social inequalities. Therefore, Chapter IVa of Directive 2003/87/EC should be deleted. Consequently, Article 1a of Decision (EU) 2015/1814 should also be deleted, as it would be no longer necessary in the absence of ETS2.
- Amendment 18PfEProposal for a decision · Recital 6 b (new)Amendment
(6 b) In order to mitigate the disproportionate impact of ETS2 and ensure an effective intervention, the excessive price increase mechanism should be prolonged over 2030 and the price cap should be reduced to EUR 25.
- Amendment 19PfEProposal for a decision · Recital 6 c (new)Amendment
(6 c) Member States should be allowed to exempt entities located in their territory from the obligation to apply ETS2.
- Amendment 20PfEProposal for a decision · Article 1 a (new)Amendment
Article1a Repeal of the Emissions Trading System for Buildings, Road Transport and additional Sectors Chapter IVa of Directive (EU) 2023/959 is deleted. Article 1a of Decision (EU) 2015/1814 is deleted.
- Amendment 21PfEProposal for a decision · Article 1 b (new)Amendment
Article1b Directive 2003/87/EC is amended as follows: (1) in Article 30e, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following: ‘By way of derogation from paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article, a competent authority of a Member State may exempt the entity located in its territory from the obligation to surrender allowances under paragraph 2 of this Article for a given reference year.’;
- Amendment 22PfEProposal for a decision · Article 1 c (new)Amendment
Article1c Directive 2003/87/EC is amended as follows: (1) in Article 30h, paragraph 2 is amended as follows: ‘Where the average price of allowances referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article exceeds a price of EUR 25 for a period of two consecutive months, 20 million allowances covered by this Chapter shall be released from the market stability reserve in accordance with Article 1a(7) of Decision (EU) 2015/1814. Indexation based on the European index of consumer prices for 2020 shall apply.’;
- Amendment 23ECRProposal for a decision · Recital 6 a (new)Amendment
(6 a) As part of the upcoming review of Directive (EU) 2003/87/EC, the Commission should thoroughly assess the introduction of Chapter IVa establishing emissions trading system for buildings, road transport and additional sectors. Particular attention should be paid to the social and financial consequences of the extension of the EU ETS for households, especially low-income and vulnerable households, as well as for transport users. The evaluation should examine, inter alia, the possibility of deleting or significantly postponing the application of Chapter IVa; the effectiveness of the extension of the EU ETS to new sectors and assessment of the proportionality of the measure given its negati…
Excerpt — full text in the official PDF. - Amendment 24ECRProposal for a decision · Recital 6 b (new)Amendment
(6 b) European households and industries are already subject to significant regulatory and financial obligations arising from the Union’s climate legislation. Measures adopted under Directive 2003/87/EC establishing the EU Emissions Trading System result in increased energy and production costs, while requirements stemming from Directive (EU) 2024/1275 on the energy performance of buildings result in substantial renovation costs for households. In this context, additional regulatory burdens, such as the introduction of the extension of the EU ETS to buildings and road transport could further increase the cost of energy, heating and transport, in particular for low-income and vulnerable house…
Excerpt — full text in the official PDF. - Amendment 25ECRProposal for a decision · Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4Current text
(4) In paragraph 7, the following sentence is inserted between the first and second sentence: ‘In the event that allowances are released from the reserve in accordance with Article 30h(2) of Directive 2003/87/EC, 20 million more allowances shall be added to the amount to be released from the
reserve.’.Amendment(4) In paragraph 7, the following sentence is inserted between the first and second sentence: ‘In the event that allowances are released from the reserve in accordance with Article 30h(2) of Directive 2003/87/EC, at least 20 million more allowances shall be added to the amount to be released from the reserve in order to effectively prevent excessive price increase.’.
- Amendment 26ECRProposal for a decision · Article 1 a (new)Amendment
Article1a Deletion of the entry into force of the emissions trading system for buildings, road transport and additional sectors Chapter IVa of Directive 2003/87 is deleted.
- Amendment 27ECRProposal for a decision · Article 1 b (new)Amendment
Article 1b Postponement of the operation of emissions trading for buildings, road transport and additional sectors The operation of emissions trading for buildings, road transport and additional sectors set out in Chapter IVa of Directive 2003/87 is postponed until 2030.
How groups usually vote on similar files
Based on 141 past main roll-call votes on ENVI-responsible procedures, Jul 2019 → 2026-07-25.
If every group voted at its historical rate, with today’s seats: ≈73% of expressed votes in favour.
Seat-weighted baseline over 711 of 711 seats · how often this method is right →
Statistical baseline from past roll-call votes; not a forecast. · roll-call votes only
Follow this procedure — subscribe to its votes (RSS)
Official amendment documents
Connections
See these connections as a navigable graph — and walk from there to anything else.
Explore the graphMembers who amended this procedure
64 Members · by amendment count
























The amendments, in full text
101 amendmentsEvery amendment as tabled — original text, proposed change and justification, with a link to the official PDF.