Murder of Mehdi Kessaci - urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking
Resolution on a topical subject.
In this non-legislative resolution, adopted on 20 January 2026, Parliament responds to the murder of Mehdi Kessaci, a 20-year-old French national killed in Marseille on 13 November 2025 in the context of drug-related violence, which it links to the civic activism of his brother Amine Kessaci and treats as an attack on freedom of expression. The text situates the killing within a broader pattern of drug-trafficking violence in Europe, citing figures on murders in Marseille, killings in Guadeloupe and Martinique, seizures of cannabis and cocaine, synthetic drug laboratories dismantled, and roughly 7 500 drug-related deaths in 2023. It notes that drug trafficking is one of the most serious threats to the Union's internal security, that European ports serve as major entry points for illicit drugs, and that fishers and dockers are targeted by trafficking networks. The resolution frames the need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking, referencing EU drugs strategies, the EU action plan against drug trafficking 2026-2030, the work of EUDA, Europol and Eurojust, and the 2024 anti-money-laundering package including the establishment of AMLA.
No committee amendments are tracked on AmendEU for this procedure; this page follows its roll-call votes in plenary instead.
Voted 20 Jan 2026
Full session brief →Amendment and partial votes (no vote on the text as a whole this session) · 12 votes
- ✕On amendment 5 · paragraph 3202 / 442 / 4↗
- ✕On amendment 6 · text to be inserted after paragraph 4169 / 440 / 30↗
- ✓On amendment 7 · text to be inserted after paragraph 5350 / 277 / 13↗
- ✓On amendment 8 · paragraph 7347 / 277 / 10↗
- ✕On amendment 9 · text to be inserted after paragraph 9207 / 431 / 9↗
- ✕On amendment 10 · text to be inserted after paragraph 9194 / 441 / 14↗
- ✕On amendment 11 · text to be inserted after paragraph 10205 / 439 / 5↗
- ✓On amendment 3 · text to be inserted after paragraph 14543 / 59 / 41↗
- ✓On amendment 12 · paragraph 22349 / 287 / 7↗
- ✓On amendment 1 · text to be inserted after recital E589 / 51 / 5↗
- ✕On amendment 4 · text to be inserted after recital E212 / 421 / 15↗
- ✓On amendment 2 · text to be inserted after recital G499 / 112 / 41↗
Plenary amendments12 tabled on this text
Amendments tabled for the plenary sitting on this text, in their own numbering series. This is a different set from the committee amendments tracked elsewhere on AmendEU, and is not counted in any of the site’s amendment totals.
- Amendment 1RenewMotion for a resolution · Recital E b (new)Amendment
Eb. whereas drug trafficking networks may seek to exert pressure or undue influence on locally elected representatives and voters, in particular at municipal level, thereby undermining the integrity of democratic processes;
- Amendment 2RenewMotion for a resolution · Recital G a (new)Amendment
Ga. whereas the European Democracy Shield emphasises that organised crime and corruption pose a direct threat to the rule of law and our democratic institutions;
- Amendment 3RenewMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 14 a (new)Amendment
14a. Stresses that forthcoming European initiatives, such as the European Ports Alliance, as well as the reforms to Europol, Eurojust and the European Public Prosecutor’s Office, should help strengthen the integrity, transparency and resilience of European ports, including by improving the protection of frontline officers and workers against the risks of intimidation and corruption;
- Amendment 4PfE, ECRMotion for a resolution · Recital E b (new)Amendment
Eb. whereas drug trafficking is generally linked to other forms of organised crime, and it also finances local and international paramilitary or terrorist organisations; whereas Hamas, Hezbollah, the Taliban and other Islamist terrorist organisations are financed by drug trafficking; whereas drug cartels also make use of illegal immigration routes;
- Amendment 5PfE, ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 3Current text
3. Stresses that actions by grassroots
associationscontribute to youth protection, social cohesion and democratic vitality and that they are often poorly recognised, supported or protected;Amendment3. Stresses that actions by law enforcement agencies, like those of grassroots associations, contribute to youth protection, social cohesion and democratic vitality and that they are often poorly recognised, supported or protected;
- Amendment 6PfEMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 4 a (new)Amendment
4a. Considers that the European Union should treat identified drug cartels as terrorist organisations, thereby making it easier for national authorities to carry out intelligence work against drug cartels;
- Amendment 7PfE, ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 5 a (new)Amendment
5a. Recalls that the new anti-drug strategy calls on the Member States to adopt zero-tolerance policies on driving under the influence of drugs, in accordance with Directive 2006/126/EC on driving licences1a, and to make full use of the cross-border tools available to enforce these rules; ___________________ 1a Directive 2006/126/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on driving licences (OJ L 403, 30.12.2006, p. 18, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2006/126/oj).
- Amendment 8PfE, ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 7 aCurrent text
7a. Calls for a strengthening of joint cross-border law enforcement operations, particularly in hotspots such as Marseille, Le Havre, Antwerp, Rotterdam and Hamburg, in close coordination with Europol, Eurojust and the EUDA, in order to dismantle the criminal networks behind the shootings, killings and intimidation taking place across Europe;
Amendment7a. Calls for a strengthening of the human, material and technological resources allocated to external border controls in the fight against trafficking in arms, human beings and drugs and of joint cross-border law enforcement operations, particularly in hotspots such as Marseille, Le Havre, Antwerp, Rotterdam and Hamburg, in close coordination with the European Border and Coast Guard Agency, Europol, Eurojust and the EUDA, in order to dismantle the criminal networks behind the shootings, killings and intimidation taking place across Europe;
- Amendment 9PfE, ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 9 b (new)Amendment
9b. Calls for careful consideration of the presence of powerful cartels in certain candidate countries and in countries covered by the European Neighbourhood Policy;
- Amendment 10PfE, ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 9 c (new)Amendment
9c. Notes that the main and most violent contemporary drug trafficking organisations in Europe, such as the DZ Mafia, the Mocro Mafia, Black Axe and Foxtrot, are largely made up of immigrants or descendants of immigrants, often from the Maghreb and Africa, where traffickers seek refuge to escape justice; calls for specific agreements between the EU and the countries of the Maghreb and Africa to facilitate the extradition and prosecution of traffickers as part of a zero-tolerance policy towards international drug trafficking;
- Amendment 11PfE, ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 10 c (new)Amendment
10c. Recalls that illegal migrants, particularly minors, are an ideal source of ‘labour’ for traffickers, as they are more discreet, mobile and dependent and are therefore easier to exploit than others;
- Amendment 12PfE, ECRMotion for a resolution · Paragraph 22Current text
22. Expresses its support for all actors on the ground, including associations, educators, social workers and local authorities; stresses the importance of adequate EU financial support for these initiatives, noting that, in this context, both the funds allocated to social action and those under the proposal for a regulation establishing the Union support for internal security for the period from 2028 to 2034 (COM(2025)0542) could be mobilised;
Amendment22. Expresses its support for all actors on the ground, including law enforcement officers, associations, educators, social workers and local authorities; stresses the importance of adequate EU financial support for these initiatives, noting that, in this context, both the funds allocated to social action and those under the proposal for a regulation establishing the Union support for internal security for the period from 2028 to 2034 (COM(2025)0542) could be mobilised;
The bar reads votes for (green), against (terracotta) and abstentions (grey). How voting works → Vote data: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL, attribution) / European Parliament, roll-call votes only.