Skip to content
← All sessions
Plenary session

10–13 March 2025

15 texts voted · 14 adopted · 0 rejected · 264 roll-call votes

New to plenary votes? How to read this page →

Tightest vote
European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025
Adopted

Margin of 91 votes · 351 for · 260 against · 70 abst

Smallest for/against margin among the session's text-deciding votes.

Most amended text
The European Social Fund Plus post-2027

542 amendments tracked · see the dossier →

Largest number of committee amendments tracked on AmendEU among the texts voted this session.

Monday 10 March

2 votes
Procedural votes · 2 votes

Agenda changes and other procedural motions of the sitting. What counts as procedural →

  • ✕Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group110 / 309 / 9↗
  • ✕Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group109 / 317 / 7↗

Tuesday 11 March

4 texts · 9 votes
Assessment of the implementation of Horizon Europe in view of its interim evaluation and recommendations for the 10th Research Framework ProgrammeAdopted

On the motion for a resolution · the text as a whole · record ↗ · adopted text ↗

472 for · 75 against · 92 abst
4 other votes on this text

Wednesday 12 March

7 texts · 229 votes
European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025Adopted

On the motion for a resolution · the text as a whole · record ↗ · adopted text ↗

469 for · 162 against · 54 abst
22 other votes on this text
European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Adopted

On the motion for a resolution · the text as a whole · record ↗ · adopted text ↗

351 for · 260 against · 70 abst
16 other votes on this text
  • ✓On paragraph 3325 / 294 / 56↗
  • ✓On paragraph 5469 / 60 / 153↗
  • ✕On paragraph 7 (part 2 of a split vote)312 / 359 / 9↗
  • ✓On paragraph 8461 / 98 / 121↗
  • ✓On paragraph 17 (part 1 of a split vote)544 / 109 / 25↗
  • ✓On paragraph 17 (part 2 of a split vote)452 / 194 / 21↗
  • ✕On paragraph 17 (part 3 of a split vote)317 / 343 / 8↗
  • ✕On paragraph 23 (part 2 of a split vote)299 / 347 / 34↗
  • ✓On paragraph 24 (part 2 of a split vote)338 / 278 / 59↗
  • ✓On paragraph 25 (part 1 of a split vote)340 / 274 / 60↗
  • ✕On paragraph 25 (part 2 of a split vote)288 / 320 / 69↗
  • ✓On paragraph 29 (part 2 of a split vote)334 / 247 / 98↗
  • ✕On paragraph 31 (part 3 of a split vote)311 / 367 / 4↗
  • ✓On paragraph 31 (part 4 of a split vote)339 / 325 / 17↗
  • ✓On paragraph 31 (part 6 of a split vote)444 / 204 / 11↗
  • ✕On paragraph 19 (part 2 of a split vote)317 / 352 / 8↗
The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in SyriaAdopted

On the motion for a resolution · the text as a whole · record ↗ · adopted text ↗

462 for · 76 against · 106 abst
32 other votes on this text
Continuing the unwavering EU support for Ukraine, after three years of Russia’s war of aggressionAdopted

On the motion for a resolution · the text as a whole · record ↗ · adopted text ↗

442 for · 98 against · 126 abst
46 other votes on this text
White paper on the future of European defenceAdopted

On the motion for a resolution · the text as a whole · record ↗ · adopted text ↗

419 for · 204 against · 46 abst
105 other votes on this text
Procedural votes · 1 vote

Agenda changes and other procedural motions of the sitting. What counts as procedural →

  • ✓11-12 November294 / 77 / 7↗

Thursday 13 March

4 texts · 24 votes
Unlawful detention and sham trials of Armenian hostages, including high-ranking political representatives from Nagorno-Karabakh, by AzerbaijanAdopted

On the motion for a resolution · the text as a whole · record ↗ · adopted text ↗

523 for · 3 against · 84 abst
4 other votes on this text
  • ✕On amendment 1 · text to be inserted after paragraph 6226 / 306 / 51↗
  • ✕On amendment 4 · paragraph 7165 / 439 / 5↗
  • ✓On paragraph 7 (part 1 of a split vote)464 / 115 / 39↗
  • ✓On paragraph 7 (part 2 of a split vote)496 / 42 / 75↗
Other votes of the day · 1 text, 14 votes

Texts with amendment or partial votes recorded this day, but no vote on the text as a whole. How texts are voted →

Social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rights14 votes
  • ✓On paragraph 5 (part 1 of a split vote)404 / 204 / 15↗
  • ✕On paragraph 5 (part 2 of a split vote)279 / 313 / 19↗
  • ✓On paragraph 5 (part 3 of a split vote)604 / 9 / 8↗
  • ✕On paragraph 5 (part 4 of a split vote)258 / 284 / 83↗
  • ✓On paragraph 5 (part 5 of a split vote)473 / 141 / 14↗
  • ✓On paragraph 5 (part 6 of a split vote)429 / 175 / 22↗
  • ✓On paragraph 5 (part 7 of a split vote)549 / 63 / 8↗
  • ✓On paragraph 13 (part 1 of a split vote)440 / 137 / 45↗
  • ✕On paragraph 13 (part 2 of a split vote)278 / 326 / 19↗
  • ✓On paragraph 16 (part 1 of a split vote)558 / 25 / 40↗
  • ✓On paragraph 16 (part 2 of a split vote)307 / 272 / 38↗
  • ✓On paragraph 16 (part 3 of a split vote)385 / 137 / 96↗
  • ✓On paragraph 16 (part 4 of a split vote)322 / 218 / 77↗
  • ✓On paragraph 18284 / 273 / 57↗

Votes are grouped by the text they concern. Each card shows the vote that adopted or rejected the text; the bar reads votes for (green), against (terracotta) and abstentions (grey). Amendment and split votes are folded under their text: a check means the vote passed, a cross means it did not. How to read a plenary session → Vote data: HowTheyVote.eu (ODbL, attribution) / European Parliament, roll-call votes only.